Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100 (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=532477)

ama0330 10-27-2007 09:19 AM

Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
No real reads but havent noticed anything either way, early in the session.


Full Tilt Poker, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LegoPoker Hand History Converter

CO: $119.25
Hero (BTN): $169
SB: $103.65
BB: $56.35
UTG: $21
MP: $99.50

Pre-Flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (BTN)
2 folds, <font color="red">CO raises to $3.50</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $12</font>, 2 folds, CO calls $8.50

Flop: ($25.50) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
CO checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($25.50) 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">CO bets $12</font>, Hero calls $12

River: ($49.50) K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">CO bets $28</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $145 and is All-In</font>

thac 10-27-2007 09:21 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
Holy jesus raptor christ. What are you doing on the flop and turn?

ama0330 10-27-2007 09:22 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
Holy jesus raptor christ. What are you doing on the flop and turn?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not raising into a better hand?

tufat23 10-27-2007 09:23 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
andrew: one thing u might wanna consider overall as a gameplan. why would u take a slightly strange line like this with no reads/history?

SABR42 10-27-2007 09:23 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
I'd bet the flop, but your line is perfect given you checked behind.

I prefer to save the tricky play for drier flops (preferably paired, because then a pair connected to the flop has 2 outs instead of 5).

monkover 10-27-2007 09:23 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
yeah flop and turn really suck imo...
bet the flop draw heavy etc...
as played ont the flop raise the turn! You have picked up the nfd.
The only reason I can see why you would flat call the turn is that you are afraid of the flush but that canīt br the case b/c you push the river.
Imo you misplayed this hand pretty badly!

thac 10-27-2007 09:23 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
I think after you flat turn, you gotta flat the river. Do you expect TT to call you when you're repping AsKx or whatever you're trying to rep? I don't understand why we're not betting flop or raising turn.

SABR42 10-27-2007 09:24 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
Holy jesus raptor christ. What are you doing on the flop and turn?

[/ QUOTE ]
I like turn play given flop actually.

monkover 10-27-2007 09:25 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Holy jesus raptor christ. What are you doing on the flop and turn?

[/ QUOTE ]
I like turn play given flop actually.

[/ QUOTE ]

but surely not if you push the river

thac 10-27-2007 09:25 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Holy jesus raptor christ. What are you doing on the flop and turn?

[/ QUOTE ]
I like turn play given flop actually.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, after flop we can't do anything else on the turn, but it sucks to only have 1/4 stack in on the turn in a rr pot.

ama0330 10-27-2007 09:28 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
I dont bet the flop because I dont want to bet/fold, and I think that very few hands of his just call on this board. I dont want to stack off on the flop because IMO the range of hands which I am ahead of there (which will call 100bb) is thin (basically only overpairs) and everything else either has pretty decent equity or just folds.

I guess the same goes on the turn, but then that makes my river shove really bad =(

On the river, his line fits a hand like KQ/AK with one spade so well that I figure I can shove for value.

Yes? No?

Jamougha 10-27-2007 09:29 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]

I dont bet the flop because I dont want to bet/fold

[/ QUOTE ]

?!!!??1!!!111

bet and get ai on the flop very happily.

SABR42 10-27-2007 09:30 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
I dont bet the flop because I dont want to bet/fold

[/ QUOTE ]
Wait... WHAT?

You were considering a fold? You have AA sir, not JJ!

[ QUOTE ]
On the river, his line fits a hand like KQ/AK with one spade so well that I figure I can shove for value.

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree with this part.

thac 10-27-2007 09:30 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I dont bet the flop because I dont want to bet/fold

[/ QUOTE ]

?!!!??1!!!111

bet and get ai on the flop very happily.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yesssssssss

ama0330 10-27-2007 09:33 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I dont bet the flop because I dont want to bet/fold

[/ QUOTE ]

?!!!??1!!!111

bet and get ai on the flop very happily.

[/ QUOTE ]

OK so I guess this is something I need to work on =(

ama0330 10-27-2007 09:52 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I dont bet the flop because I dont want to bet/fold

[/ QUOTE ]
Wait... WHAT?

You were considering a fold? You have AA sir, not JJ!

[ QUOTE ]
On the river, his line fits a hand like KQ/AK with one spade so well that I figure I can shove for value.

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree with this part.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is there a flop that you wont stack off on in a rr pot with an overpair? I guess the fact that the pot is rr is what I think Im missing here - I think I am treating this more as a raised pot than a 3bet pot. Dohh

thac 10-27-2007 09:55 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
KQJ against a nit

bones 10-27-2007 09:56 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I dont bet the flop because I dont want to bet/fold

[/ QUOTE ]
Wait... WHAT?

You were considering a fold? You have AA sir, not JJ!

[ QUOTE ]
On the river, his line fits a hand like KQ/AK with one spade so well that I figure I can shove for value.

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree with this part.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is there a flop that you wont stack off on in a rr pot with an overpair? I guess the fact that the pot is rr is what I think Im missing here - I think I am treating this more as a raised pot than a 3bet pot. Dohh

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not stacking off on like QJT flops. That's uh...about it. Is his range really that rich in small pairs where you feel like getting it in is unprofitable?

ama0330 10-27-2007 10:01 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I dont bet the flop because I dont want to bet/fold

[/ QUOTE ]
Wait... WHAT?

You were considering a fold? You have AA sir, not JJ!

[ QUOTE ]
On the river, his line fits a hand like KQ/AK with one spade so well that I figure I can shove for value.

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree with this part.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is there a flop that you wont stack off on in a rr pot with an overpair? I guess the fact that the pot is rr is what I think Im missing here - I think I am treating this more as a raised pot than a 3bet pot. Dohh

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not stacking off on like QJT flops. That's uh...about it. Is his range really that rich in small pairs where you feel like getting it in is unprofitable?

[/ QUOTE ]

As a general rule, in raised pots I would check a straight and FD flop behind because I think that stacking off there is relatively unprofitable given that the type of hand that villain will stack off with is either ahead or has excellent equity. Given that I am a fish I applied this situation to this hand but neglected to realise that this is a 3bet pot and therefore that stacking off on this flop in this hand is totally different to the situation I just described.

Jamougha 10-27-2007 10:02 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]

As a general rule, in raised pots I would check a straight and FD flop behind because I think that stacking off there is relatively unprofitable given that the type of hand that villain will stack off with is either ahead or has excellent equity.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah don't do this either. bet-bet-bet

ama0330 10-27-2007 10:03 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

As a general rule, in raised pots I would check a straight and FD flop behind because I think that stacking off there is relatively unprofitable given that the type of hand that villain will stack off with is either ahead or has excellent equity.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah don't do this either. bet-bet-bet

[/ QUOTE ]


Ok, so your line in a situation where you raise pre with AA, villain flats IP, flop 987 two tone, you lead and he raises? Flat call or b3b?

Jamougha 10-27-2007 10:04 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

As a general rule, in raised pots I would check a straight and FD flop behind because I think that stacking off there is relatively unprofitable given that the type of hand that villain will stack off with is either ahead or has excellent equity.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah don't do this either. bet-bet-bet

[/ QUOTE ]


Ok, so your line in a situation where you raise pre with AA, villain flats IP, flop 987 two tone, you lead and he raises? Flat call or b3b?

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a fold, there is a world of diff between 987 and 954 though.

Requin 10-27-2007 10:40 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
With 100BB it's not terrible to slowplay a bit on the flop vs. a guy who's passive (if he's aggro bet so he can bluff you). Stacks like this though I almost never slowplay. Turn is standard imo, river I'd prefer like a raise to 65 or something dumb/fold to rr.

sightless 10-27-2007 11:50 AM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
I bet flop
Raise turn
as played river shove seems cool

ama0330 10-27-2007 12:01 PM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
In the end he had KQss so I was getting stacked pretty much whatever happened, but this thread has taught me a lot so ty all for responses [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

markuisis 10-27-2007 12:02 PM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
I dont bet the flop because I dont want to bet/fold, and I think that very few hands of his just call on this board. I dont want to stack off on the flop because IMO the range of hands which I am ahead of there (which will call 100bb) is thin (basically only overpairs) and everything else either has pretty decent equity or just folds.

I guess the same goes on the turn, but then that makes my river shove really bad =(

On the river, his line fits a hand like KQ/AK with one spade so well that I figure I can shove for value.

Yes? No?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ur flop logic is poor, there r a lot of overpairs in villains range that will shove and u have very good equity against flush draws. Ur river shove is marginal IMO, CO sometimes plays a scared set this way and I dont think kq or sometimes ak pay off that river too often.

ikestoys 10-27-2007 12:08 PM

Re: Im so boring. Prs to be line check? NL100
 
[ QUOTE ]
I dont bet the flop because I dont want to bet/fold, and I think that very few hands of his just call on this board. I dont want to stack off on the flop because IMO the range of hands which I am ahead of there (which will call 100bb) is thin (basically only overpairs) and everything else either has pretty decent equity or just folds.

I guess the same goes on the turn, but then that makes my river shove really bad =(

On the river, his line fits a hand like KQ/AK with one spade so well that I figure I can shove for value.

Yes? No?

[/ QUOTE ]

::pukes a little::


you are very much ahead of the range you described


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.