Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   1000; river c/r bluff (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=552907)

freekie 11-24-2007 10:51 AM

Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
 
this bluff sucks obv. but its a cheap way to get a donky image...

but since the cutoff is open limping i do not think its necessary [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]:):)

futuredoc85 11-24-2007 11:03 AM

Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
 
havent read any replies but it looks like you did a great job of repping busted spades/JT pretty much exactly

sauce123 11-24-2007 11:18 AM

Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
if he can read hands at all hes not folding K high here

[/ QUOTE ]

lol if thats the case you dont c/r the river nearly often enough

[/ QUOTE ]

fees- against a thinking opponent this is a rly sick line with KQ QJ for sure

fees 11-24-2007 12:52 PM

Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
 
Everyone make sure you read my post about where this came from. Also sauce I've been thinking the same thing, c/ring river with middle pair type hands for value agaisnt better opponents. Going to experiment with it next week.

Paul Thomson 11-24-2007 01:52 PM

Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
 
[ QUOTE ]
Hrm, this is very interesting, this is actually a hand out of NLH theory and concept. The back of the book lists a series of concepts (about 50 of them) and for most displays an example. I thought this was terrible and was wondering if everyone else thought the same. I'm trying to sort through this book right now for the good and the bad and it looks like this made the bad list.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

NLSoldier 11-24-2007 07:12 PM

Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
 
villians that open limp the CO dont read hands well enough to know you usually dont have anything here so I think the move is fine but make it bigger than 120 to make sure he folds his QT or w/e.

Suwalski 11-24-2007 07:21 PM

Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
if he can read hands at all hes not folding K high here

[/ QUOTE ]

lol if thats the case you dont c/r the river nearly often enough

[/ QUOTE ]

fees- against a thinking opponent this is a rly sick line with KQ QJ for sure

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't get it exactly, why is this a good line to take with KQ, QJ? What worse hands do you guys expect to call you with? I imagine the river c/r is for value right?

Btw except durr, how often is a thinking player limping the botton?

WelshChip 11-24-2007 09:11 PM

Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
 
Q5 = QK for those that don't realise

olof86 11-24-2007 10:27 PM

Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
 
[ QUOTE ]
Hrm, this is very interesting, this is actually a hand out of NLH theory and concept.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nice save [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

mendacity 11-24-2007 11:11 PM

Re: 1000; river c/r bluff
 
[ QUOTE ]
i bet this turn 100%

[/ QUOTE ]

This is not going to yield fold equity.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.