Re: Changes To American Democracy
 

I lifted this from the Volokh Conspiracy blog, written by Steven Landsburg. If this not fair use please alert me.

"The problem with democracy is not that politicians kowtow to financiers and lobbyists; it’s that politicians kowtow to their own consituents, spending other people’s money along the way. In other words, their incentives are all wrong. Effective reform should supply better incentives.

So if I could make just one change in the American political system, it would be to give each voter two votes in every congressional election. You’d get one vote to cast in your own district and another to cast in the district of your choice. When a congressman from West Virginia funnels taxpayers’ money from fifty states to his home district, I want him to face the prospect that taxpayers from fifty states will share their feelings with him on election day.

I’d also redraw the boundaries of Congressional districts according to the alphabet instead of geography. Instead of congressmen from central Delaware and northern Colorado, we’d have a congressman for everyone whose name begins with AA through AE, another for everyone whose name begins with AF through AL, and so on. The point being that it’s easy to devise a pork barrel project that benefits everyone in northern Colorado, but a lot harder to devise a pork barrel project that benefits everyone whose name happens to begin with Q.

Finally, I want federal income tax rates determined separately in each congressional district, as a function of how much spending your congressman has voted for. The more he votes to spend, the more you pay in taxes. That should solve the problem of voters who pay little attention to what their representatives are up to."

Please, practical criticsms please. I'm already aware taxation is theft, but these are simple changes on the road to liberty.

I personally love the second suggestion, but it would only be possible through electronic voting.

Re: Changes To American Democracy
 

Targeted "sniping" of politicians would occur. It would make politicians far more centrist than before, because political groups would mobilize to quickly *eliminate* opposing senators. So I suppose you'd have to endow the seats for fairly long term limits, like four years. At the same time, these centrist politicans would be unable to take much risk, which is a good thing. It seems like it would be deeply unappealing to most at the same time.

Re: Changes To American Democracy
 

Much better would be to remove districts entirely for the House and make it one gigantic proportional representation election. Even if you still divide seats between the states, going proportional is way better than any kind of districting.

Re: Changes To American Democracy
 

[ QUOTE ]
Much better would be to remove districts entirely for the House and make it one gigantic proportional representation election. Even if you still divide seats between the states, going proportional is way better than any kind of districting.

[/ QUOTE ]

You and I are on the same wavelength, my friend.

Re: Changes To American Democracy
 

The people in power will never actually vote to "reform" themselves; i.e. they will never vote to decrease their own power. They will however ceaselessly vote to increase their power while labeling it "reform."

McCain-Feingold FTW.

Re: Changes To American Democracy
 

I have a change for American Democracy: it rhymes with "ocialism"