read me
 

Most of our reads come from stats. Most of our "stat" reads are with much fewer hands than this, like 50 to 150 hands. So, I'm asking you, microfolk, to read me and tell me what kind of player you think I am, based on stats alone.

http://i207.photobucket.com/albums/b...th1/readme.jpg

Re: read me
 

Stats alone, I'd consider you a TAG-spew monkey...tough to play against when they're running good and have position, but overall pretty exploitable. I doubt many people @ this limit are gonna make the right adjustments, so I'm willing to bet that you've got a pretty sick win rate over this sample.

Your river AF is higher than most of the forums flop AF...thats pretty awesome

Re: read me
 

wtf bitch, where you been?

what makes me "exploitable"?

Re: read me
 

For these hands I read it kind of loose preflop and very aggressive. Aggressive post flop but not exploitably loose. Defends blinds, maybe light sometimes. Attacks blinds aggressively, sometimes light.

Re: read me
 

[ QUOTE ]
For these hands I read it kind of loose preflop and very aggressive. Aggressive post flop but not exploitably loose. Defends blinds, maybe light sometimes. Attacks blinds aggressively, sometimes light.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sure sample size and limit have a lot to do with the blind part. I've just started playing 6 max, but a lot of the time it will go utg raise, cold call, cold call and I've got 67o or T7s or something like that in the BB so I will see a flop, then dump it. standard?

Re: read me
 

Well, I've played about 35K hands of 6 max (mostly at this limit and some lower) the problem is I probably didn't play any of them very well [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]. My VP$IP is closer to 26-28% and PFR is 14%. And I agree this sample size probably doesn't tell the story. I am a little tighter than your sample though. Others have used the "nit" word [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]!!! My win rate over the 35K six max hands is only running +1.3 though (less than FR) so my advice here is probably worth exactly nothing.

Re: read me
 

Expert 4-handed player or spewtard? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: read me
 

If you mean me. Expert spewtard.

Re: read me
 

[ QUOTE ]
wtf bitch, where you been?

what makes me "exploitable"?

[/ QUOTE ]

Where should I start...seriously

Re: read me
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
For these hands I read it kind of loose preflop and very aggressive. Aggressive post flop but not exploitably loose. Defends blinds, maybe light sometimes. Attacks blinds aggressively, sometimes light.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm sure sample size and limit have a lot to do with the blind part. I've just started playing 6 max, but a lot of the time it will go utg raise, cold call, cold call and I've got 67o or T7s or something like that in the BB so I will see a flop, then dump it. standard?

[/ QUOTE ]

All of those are standard completions, but they don't account for your ridiculously high blind defense stats