Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   standard spot (handrange analysis)tm (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=467369)

donkeykong2 08-02-2007 09:46 AM

standard spot (handrange analysis)tm
 
Alright, basic spot, 6 handed game utg raises, we are in the small blind. utg raises 15% of his hands preflop to 4 bb and c-bets 100% of the flops.
We put utg on: 22-aa:7%
ak-a10, kq, kj:8%
We call the raise on the sb with 9% and everyone else folds:
our range 22-aa 7% and ak,aq 2%

the flop comes 49j rainbow
We check/call: ?
We check/fold: ?
We bet: ?

Bramsterdam 08-02-2007 09:47 AM

Re: standard spot (handrange analysis)tm
 
Errrrrr I don't get it

bubaloo 08-02-2007 09:54 AM

Re: standard spot (handrange analysis)tm
 
Board: 4c 9d Jh
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 44.302% 43.94% 00.36% 3891733 31912.50 { 22+, AQs+, AQo+ }
Hand 1: 55.698% 55.34% 00.36% 4900982 31912.50 { 22+, KJs+, KJo+ }

check/call, turn?

donkeykong2 08-02-2007 09:55 AM

Re: standard spot (handrange analysis)tm
 
i m using the method suggested in these 2 threads:
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...ue#Post11489117
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...ue#Post11483469

Bramsterdam 08-02-2007 09:59 AM

Re: standard spot (handrange analysis)tm
 
But we can see our own cards right? Why do we have to work with a range for our own cards?

donkeykong2 08-02-2007 10:07 AM

Re: standard spot (handrange analysis)tm
 
you dont have to do the same thing with every hand in the range, that would be totally pointless.

the answers should look like this:
check/call: 88,1010 (1/9)
check/raise: qq,kk,aa (1.5/9)
check/fold:: 22,33,55,66,77 (3/9)
bet: 44,99,jj,ak,aq (3/9)

it actually doesnt add up to 9 because i had to discount the probablity of the pairs by 0.5 to get to the correct relation to the other hands.

bubaloo 08-02-2007 10:11 AM

Re: standard spot (handrange analysis)tm
 
do you mean splitting our ranges up, like this:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 39.237% 38.75% 00.49% 1486832 18792.00 { 99-22 }
Hand 1: 60.763% 60.27% 00.49% 2312824 18792.00 { 22+, KJs+, KJo+ }

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 70.969% 70.42% 00.55% 1627111 12741.00 { TT+ }
Hand 1: 29.031% 28.48% 00.55% 658067 12741.00 { 22+, KJs+, KJo+ }

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 36.957% 34.78% 02.18% 1727128 108115.50 { AQs+, KJs+, AQo+, KJo+ }
Hand 1: 63.043% 60.87% 02.18% 3022481 108115.50 { 22+, KJs+, KJo+ }

if so, i quite like this idea, as it gives you a deeper understanding of what to do with certain groups of hands.

i doubt this will catch on though, as it seems like a lot of effort. i think people would rather know there hand and apply ranges to the villain.

donkeykong2 08-02-2007 10:13 AM

Re: standard spot (handrange analysis)tm
 
[ QUOTE ]
But we can see our own cards right? Why do we have to work with a range for our own cards?

[/ QUOTE ]

we want to analyse multiple hands at once, thats why we work with the range.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.