b/f or c/c straight on ugly board
 

Pacific Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $1/$2
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $232.1
UTG+1: $278.83
CO: $196
Button: $166.75
SB: $218.67
Hero: $200

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is BB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG calls, 4 folds, Hero checks.

Flop: 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($5, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $4</font>, UTG calls.

Turn: J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($13, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $8</font>, UTG calls.

River: T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($29, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $16</font>, <font color="#cc0000">UTG raises to $52</font>, Hero folds.
Uncalled bets: $36 returned to UTG.

Results:
Final pot: $61

villain is 26.5/0/0.18 over only 64 hands

is b/f standard here or is it better to c/c in spots like this?

Re: b/f or c/c straight on ugly board
 

well b/f is better than c/c, but why are you betting so weak on river?

Re: b/f or c/c straight on ugly board
 

why is b/f better than c/c....? and when is c/c better than b/f?

Re: b/f or c/c straight on ugly board
 

because betting gets value from hands that would check behind

Re: b/f or c/c straight on ugly board
 

[ QUOTE ]
because betting gets value from hands that would check behind

[/ QUOTE ]

true but you miss value from hands that would bluf on the river


and also isnt it possible that you fold the best hand, when someone decides to raise your river bet with just trips 10's...

Re: b/f or c/c straight on ugly board
 

and c/c can cost more than b/f

Re: b/f or c/c straight on ugly board
 

its also important to note his aggression factor here. some kind of T with a club is a large portion of his range, and if his kicker's real weak he may check it back.

Re: b/f or c/c straight on ugly board
 

bet more on turn too