Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
 

well, he is a sooner

and everyone knows that sooners suck! [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
 

My early pick to win this thing is Herbie, with a side order of nez.

I'll be talking a little bit about the alliance structure after I post the results of the first challenge.

Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
 

To further my prediction:

Unless he wins the first HoH, I think clown gets nominated first, and probably voted out.

Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
 

I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say Luckay wins.

Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
 

I would take action against Luckay and give you 10-1.

Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
 

That's why it's a limb and not a treehouse.

Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
 

[ QUOTE ]
I would take action against Luckay and give you 10-1.

[/ QUOTE ]

having barely read the game-thread, I probably wouldn't take that bet

*edit- give me 14:1

actually- given the fact that Luckay is afk, I'll want better odds than that even- its far too easy to eliminate an afk player who probably isnt a part of any alliances

Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
 

who wants last longer for monies? srsly....

everyone gets a player, puts in like $5 or somthing... escrow to a mod (not durron ldo) then whoevers player lasts longer wins it all. down?

alex jacob
Chuck
clown
dmk
HBE
herbie
Luckay
Mets
nez
nich
Siegmund
Valenzuela

Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
 

Wagering is perfectly acceptable.

Caveat: ONLY PEOPLE I KNOW CAN BET. No gimmicks, no noobs. No cheating.

I'll escrow, if you want.

Re: VIEWER THREAD - Big Brother - NO PLAYERS
 

this thread is suddenly more interesting than the actual game thread.