Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Omaha High (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   FR and 6 max (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=527955)

Wires 10-21-2007 05:13 PM

FR and 6 max
 
Not the usual "what is more profitable question?". Having just switched over from NLHE I was wondering if the Omaha climate is the same among 2+2ers. In NLHE easily 2/3rds of 2+2ers play SH. Is this the same among PLO players (.50/1 - 2/4) or is there relatively more interest in FR?

sc000t 10-21-2007 06:00 PM

Re: FR and 6 max
 
SH>6max>FR

alavet 10-22-2007 01:34 AM

Re: FR and 6 max
 
[ QUOTE ]
HU>SH>6max>FR

[/ QUOTE ]

Wires 10-22-2007 02:52 AM

Re: FR and 6 max
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
HU>SH>6max>FR

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you have misunderstood my question. I wasn't asking which form of poker you think is best - it was purely a numbers question.

In NLHE most 2+2ers gravitate towards the 6 max tables as opposed to full ring. My question was whether this trend holds true with 2+2ers who play PLO - or does full ring get a little more action with PLO?

alavet 10-22-2007 02:56 AM

Re: FR and 6 max
 
well, i hvnt even read original post, but first noticed sc00t reply so i replied it to him [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

about your question: why?
you are afraid of 2+2 in Full ring or whatever? just play the game you good with and dont careabout anything.
i belive most 2+2 plays 6max-

Buzz 10-22-2007 03:06 AM

Re: FR and 6 max
 
Wires - I don't know what the answer to your question is.

You might try making a poll to see how many posters primarily play each type of game.

iggymcfly 10-22-2007 03:42 AM

Re: FR and 6 max
 
I tend to play 6-max most often since that's what's running the most, but it's definitely where my results are the worst. For some reason, I do great really short and I do well at FR, but the 5-6 handed games, I struggle with a little:

(all results in PTBB)
HU : 26.4 BB/100 (2,100 hands)
SH : 18.9 BB/100 (9,300 hands)
FR : 15.3 BB/100 (3,200 hands)
6-max: 5.3 BB/100 (46,000 hands)

I guess sample size could be a real issue here, but I definitely think there's something to it. Probably though, it's as simple as I play best short, but when I do play FR, it's because there's a really good game going.

roggles 10-22-2007 04:25 AM

Re: FR and 6 max
 
No way you make 26 BB/100 heads up in the long run. That would be pretty sick.

RoundTower 10-22-2007 08:01 AM

Re: FR and 6 max
 
to answer your original question, I think mostly 6 max. There are more 6 max games going on all sites and there are more 6 max HHs posted here. Although people here err on the nitty side, to say the least, so maybe more of them are playing FR than I thought.

wazz 10-22-2007 09:30 AM

Re: FR and 6 max
 
I prefer and am better at full ring.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.