Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
 

Antoine Walker
Stephon Marbury
Steve Francis

somewhere, tuq is slitting one of both of his wrists

http://www.basketball-reference.com/.../hof_prob.html

Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
 

wow Vince Carter > John Stockton was pretty shocking

Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
 

Reggie Miller at 4%?

Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
 

[ QUOTE ]
wow Vince Carter > John Stockton was pretty shocking

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that's because the formula is based on an objective interpretation of numbers, whereas we know subjectively that John Stockton is 100% guaranteed to make the hall of fame because we know the voters will vote for him without doing this calculation first.

Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
 

139 Steve Nash .1168
149 Latrell Sprewell .0920

Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
 

[ QUOTE ]
Reggie Miller at 4%?

[/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] i was 31 playing basketball through my entire youth cause of him

Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Reggie Miller at 4%?

[/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] i was 31 playing basketball through my entire youth cause of him

[/ QUOTE ]
During the playoffs which preceded the Pacers making the Finals, I remember hearing the media say that Reggie wasn't a HOFer. When the Pacers won the East Finals, I heard Cheryl say something like, "Now do you still think he's not a HOFer?", since Reggie not being able to carry his team to the Finals was a knock against him.

Also, name someone who was a better SG than Miller (outside MJ) in the 90s.

Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
wow Vince Carter > John Stockton was pretty shocking

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that's because the formula is based on an objective interpretation of numbers, whereas we know subjectively that John Stockton is 100% guaranteed to make the hall of fame because we know the voters will vote for him without doing this calculation first.

[/ QUOTE ]
It's because the formula isn't perfect. Objectively, subjectively, metaphysically, or subconsciously Stockton was a better player than Vince.

Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
 

[ QUOTE ]
It's because the formula isn't perfect. Objectively, subjectively, metaphysically, or subconsciously Stockton was a better player than Vince.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, that's pretty much what I meant.

Re: Players with a higher HoF probability than Nash
 

<font color="white"> . </font>