TO: David Sklansky
 

David,

this forum is titled News, Views, & Gossip for a reason...you have failed to deliver any of the three

I respect your opinions and enjoy your posts, but you should stay away from NVG until you can deliver at least 10 (which is only half) names from the looming question below...it's only fair David.


Question: Regarding the very big, live game, full table NLH games, how many players who are, or were, considered mainly internet players, would be among the top twenty best players, playing that game?

Re: TO: David Sklansky
 

hes said many times (I think) that he knows he isnt qualified to answer this (he isn't). This really doesnt need its own thread.

Re: TO: David Sklansky
 

[ QUOTE ]
hes said many times (I think) that he knows he isnt qualified to answer this (he isn't).

[/ QUOTE ]


he's around the people who are qualified to answer...until those people can give him some names the posts should stop

Re: TO: David Sklansky
 

Zero ldo

Re: TO: David Sklansky
 

jesus christ,

i am going to make a thread about this as well.

Re: TO: David Sklansky
 

In his first thread, referring to KT's comment that the best online players can't lay down a hand, DS says "I barely know many of the players he was thinking of," so it sure sounds like DS doesn't think he is qulified to comment on the internet players.

damn. my post deserved it's own thread.

Re: TO: David Sklansky
 

[ QUOTE ]
Zero ldo

[/ QUOTE ]

i dont think ourhouse would let her play in the big game

Re: TO: David Sklansky
 

what a great thread, i mean, after David reads this he is going to definately stop making (what he thinks are) controversial threads contrived to generate more interest in his site . . .

Re: TO: David Sklansky
 

The best part is, DS will probably make a new thread to reply to this one.


lol

Re: TO: David Sklansky
 

op-

i'm pretty sure david's posts are easily described as gossip and/or views