Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Omaha High (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   Sexiness? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=334618)

TheRempel 02-17-2007 06:20 PM

Sexiness?
 
SB is somewhat of a spaz. His turn lead range is pretty huge. UTG is most certainly not calling the reraise without a monster draw (which he would raise with himself) a set (which again, he would raise) or top two, which he *might* smoothcall with.

Party Poker
Pot Limit Omaha Ring game
Blinds: $1/$2
10 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $343.90
TheRempel: $353.05
UTG+2: $304.05
MP1: $313.47
MP2: $245.10
MP3: $209.10
CO: $317.10
Button: $361.30
SB: $124.19
BB: $174.05

Pre-flop: (10 players) TheRempel is UTG+1 with 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG calls, <font color="#cc0000">TheRempel raises to $10</font>, 4 folds, CO calls, Button calls, SB calls, BB folds, UTG calls.

Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($52, 5 players)
SB checks, UTG checks, TheRempel checks, CO checks, Button checks.

Turn: 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($52, 5 players)
<font color="#cc0000">SB bets $50.35</font>, UTG calls, <font color="#cc0000">TheRempel raises to $251.75</font>

GAL 02-17-2007 07:45 PM

Re: Sexiness?
 
I would fold this, but i'm only posting my response to see why I'm wrong.

holdme 02-17-2007 08:47 PM

Re: Sexiness?
 
Given your reads, I would have to say SEXINESS.

TheRempel 02-17-2007 09:47 PM

Re: Sexiness?
 
Given CO and Button behind I can see your reasoning. Sometimes I just feel the SEXINESS though.

CrushinFelt 02-17-2007 10:44 PM

Re: Sexiness?
 
Fine if sb is that weak. Otherwise it's hard to put you on a big hand and a decent player should call you with any marginal+ holdings.

grizy 02-18-2007 06:47 PM

Re: Sexiness?
 
I like it for a lot of reasons. Not somethign I'd pull regularly though.

joewatch 02-18-2007 11:24 PM

Re: Sexiness?
 
I don't see how raise can be right here. Surely SB missed his CR on the flop, and you are a dog to every possible hand UTG could have. That board is so draw heavy, I don't think you have any fold equity with your raise.

TheRempel 02-18-2007 11:38 PM

Re: Sexiness?
 
Well I certainly have fold equity against the UTG caller, and the whole point is that is all that really matters. I have yet to see the SB c/r the flop with a set; he may have two pair though.

grizy 02-19-2007 03:23 AM

Re: Sexiness?
 
I really think it's situation dependent and Rempel obviously had reasons to believe fold equity is very good here. This, at minimum, is good for metagame.

Personally, I do something like this 6 handed probably once every 20 orbits... and only against very specific opponents.

BluffTHIS! 02-19-2007 05:20 AM

Re: Sexiness?
 
Rempel,

I have 2 questions:

1) Is "sexiness" a new euphemism for "lagishness"?

2) When you make that raise on the turn after raising pre and then checking the flop, what hand do they put you on?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.