Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   NL400 - River trips vs. loose-passive insta-shove (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=546619)

Burdzthewurd 11-15-2007 03:57 AM

NL400 - River trips vs. loose-passive insta-shove
 
NL400 6-handed

Villain has $620 and covers Hero. I stacked him on a 1/2NL FR table earlier when he called a 1.5x pot bet on 764 two heart flop then check/called AI when a 3 hit the turn with 34 against my 75hh and I held. Notes on him say he's loose-passive, peels off any backdoor draw for PSB on flop in raised pots, and will limp/call garbage OOP. Haven't seen him make more than a minraise preflop, usually just limping in. Should I have lead turn or river? Bet/fold river maybe?

Villain raises to $8, 1 fold, Button calls, SB calls, Hero calls with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

Flop J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

SB checks, Hero checks, Villain checks.

Turn K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

SB checks, Hero checks, Villain bets $32, SB folds, Hero calls.

River K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

Hero checks, Villain goes all-in, Hero?

Burdzthewurd 11-15-2007 07:04 AM

Re: NL400 - River trips vs. loose-passive insta-shove
 
Bump - is this standard call/fold? I've asked around and got major differences in opinion

D0p3Ad1c7 11-15-2007 07:21 AM

Re: NL400 - River trips vs. loose-passive insta-shove
 
Fold preflop pretty standard imo...
c/c turn as played...
b/f on the river... I guess... 1/2 pot - 3/4 pot should work

JFsports 11-15-2007 08:06 AM

Re: NL400 - River trips vs. loose-passive insta-shove
 
I'd b/f the river, as played I think this is a pretty easy fold.

klb. 11-15-2007 08:43 AM

Re: NL400 - River trips vs. loose-passive insta-shove
 
Lead turn for value for sure. And bet/fold river, do you think you will induce a bluff/thin vbet with a check from the player you described? I don't. As played it's an easy fold as JFsports said, you beat a bluff. And there's about 0% chance that a massive overbet like this from the player described would be a bluff. He have a monster.

shipsandgiggles 11-15-2007 08:49 AM

Re: NL400 - River trips vs. loose-passive insta-shove
 
that minraise looks like donkplayed 55 or tt

docnuclear 11-15-2007 09:40 AM

Re: NL400 - River trips vs. loose-passive insta-shove
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'd b/f the river, as played I think this is a pretty easy fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

capone0 11-15-2007 09:45 AM

Re: NL400 - River trips vs. loose-passive insta-shove
 
[ QUOTE ]
that minraise looks like donkplayed 55 or tt

[/ QUOTE ]

What min raise? He psb the turn.

VitoT 11-15-2007 10:06 AM

Re: NL400 - River trips vs. loose-passive insta-shove
 
fold.

JackAll 11-15-2007 11:24 AM

Re: NL400 - River trips vs. loose-passive insta-shove
 
wow ... you have over 2k posts and someone overbet pushes huge - $550 onto a $100 pot - and you are not sure what to do with trips worse kicker?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.