Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   High Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   25/50 deep - QQ (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=525478)

Kalashnikov 10-18-2007 12:22 AM

25/50 deep - QQ
 
I am playing a 4 3handed tables on Boss Media. Its the same two guys at all tables. We have been playing 4handed all tables a long while, but last guy left. The game has started to been quite deep and therefore pretty loose. I have played the most LAG-game of all. Raising and reraising light. Probably played something like 45/35. Ive made some moves, been looked up sometimes, but most have been good, and im the guy who is up the most ~5 buyins.

Last 15 minutes i made two big moves against the villain in this hand. First hand one guy raises utg, i call Th8h on button. Villain raises 700 from bb. utg folds, I call. Flop 337. Check check. Turn 9. He bets 1800, I call. River 4x. He checks, I bet 2,7K. He folds.

Next hand he opens on the button, I call KcTc in the bb. Flop 862. I checkraise to 950 and he calls. Turn 2. I check to him again. He bets 1,6 and I checkraise too 4,4K. He folds.

I showed BOTH hand - worth no notice.

This hands is like 5 minutes after the KT-hand. Effective stacks 17K. Button opens to 200. I make it 650 from sb. Villain makes it 1600 from bb. I decide to call - does anyone 5bet here?

Flop 37T two spades. I checkcall 2200. Does anyone lead or checkraise here?

Ill wait with the last two streets.

Villains nick is by the way El_Milagro if anyone is familiar with boss media. He is a winning player, kindda laggish, but a bit callish in my opinion.

K

Allinlife 10-18-2007 12:29 AM

Re: 25/50 deep - QQ
 
i think given how deep is 5 betting QQ overplaying it too much. Given your image I think checkraising is slightly better than check-call

fsuplayer 10-18-2007 12:55 AM

Re: 25/50 deep - QQ
 
ok, sounds reasonable so far, whats the turn?

king_of_drafts 10-18-2007 01:38 AM

Re: 25/50 deep - QQ
 
[ QUOTE ]
i think given how deep is 5 betting QQ overplaying it too much. Given your image I think checkraising is slightly better than check-call

[/ QUOTE ]

elaborate

Lefort 10-18-2007 01:58 AM

Re: 25/50 deep - QQ
 
Sick fun hand. Seems okay so far.. problem though is that he really has you by the balls on the turn...

CASINOCASINO 10-18-2007 03:47 AM

Re: 25/50 deep - QQ
 
Id check raise this flop and call an all in, and feel very good about it.

PoppinFresh 10-18-2007 04:01 AM

Re: 25/50 deep - QQ
 
I really think leading is by far the best play given the history, he has to be frustrated but even so it's tough to find a way to get him to put in money. C/c the flop and then what? If you lead the turn you're looking too strong, check it and you make it way too easy on him. C/r the flop again just looks to strong to me, even frustrated he's rarely stacking off with worse IMO.

Leading, however, is perfect. It looks fishy and this is the perfect spot for him to put in an "F you" raise or float.

lapoker17 10-18-2007 04:04 AM

Re: 25/50 deep - QQ
 
i dunno why everyone rules out 5 betting this 3 handed if you've been playing as nuts as you say.

Terkman 10-18-2007 04:40 AM

Re: 25/50 deep - QQ
 
how deep are you?

Nezzar 10-18-2007 06:44 AM

Re: 25/50 deep - QQ
 
kal,

nice mice to see u posting here. v interesting hand! given history i think u know that u are going to felt this. 5-betting is meh... i dont like it. as for flop i think that leading is the best way to get the money in ahead. chk calling makes things impossible. If he is good he will only continue to play if he has u beat so for that reason i think u can safely fold turn. i have to admit that thats what i probably do in the heat of battle but now i def. think leading flop and get it in is the best.

5-betting can be good for future play but short-term i think its bad.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.