NL200 - interesting river decisions
 

No real reads on villain. He doesn't seem all that great and is sitting short, so no reason to assume he's particularly good I'd imagine.

I probably should have folded PF. Given that I didn't, I think I should have bet the flop.

I felt like a call on the river was too weak, but could I fold to the push given that I raised? Flame away b/c I'm pretty sure I deserve it.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $2 BB (7 handed) Hand History Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

MP1 ($121.05)
MP2 ($112.60)
CO ($94.60)
Hero ($212.90)
SB ($185)
BB ($211.90)
UTG ($241.90)

Preflop: Hero is Button with 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP1 calls $2, MP2 calls $2, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Hero calls $2, SB completes, BB checks.

Flop: ($10) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks, Hero checks.

Turn: ($10) 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, MP1 checks, MP2 checks, Hero checks.

River: ($10) 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, MP1 checks, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 bets $10</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $30</font>, SB folds, BB folds, MP1 folds, <font color="#CC3333">MP2 raises to $110.6</font>, Hero calls $80.60.

Final Pot: $231.20

Re: NL200 - very interesting river decision
 

Raising when it's been checked down to the river on anything less than the nuts is asking to be re-raised by the nuts. This is a rule I really try to stick to. It seems really weak to call here but your hand isn't that strong and what are you getting value out of, really? Is a 2 really calling that raise?

Re: NL200 - very interesting river decision
 

[ QUOTE ]
what are you getting value out of, really? Is a 2 really calling that raise?

[/ QUOTE ]

a 7

i think this hand is played fine, unless you have real reason to believe he'd slowplay the flush on the turn

Re: NL200 - very interesting river decision
 

Do not bet the flop

I call the river but I don't feel great about doing so ... I've just seen crap enough here to justify it. You might also be splitting with 78 in which case a fold costs you $35. I feel like another 78 here is probably more likely than a flush.

Re triumph36: a 7?

Re: NL200 - very interesting river decision
 

I won't correct it - I'll leave my stupidity to posterity but yes any 7 is also a possibility.

Re: NL200 - very interesting river decision
 

One thing I thought made this hand unique was that both my cards are used for the straight. I thought it was very possible 77 or 67 could have bet that river and would have also called a raise. I also thought I would have heard from a flush on the turn.

I'm just starting to work NL200 tables into my NL100 sets so I probably don't have a great feel for what will bet / call / raise in some situations.

Edit: Forgot about A7. Probably any 7, though I feel those are the most likely.

Edit 2: Seems every poster beat me to this post, but I'll leave it.