Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Full Ring (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=80)
-   -   LC - Why don't you play 6 max ? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=481441)

MrBump 08-19-2007 04:30 PM

LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
 
So far I have only played full-ring cash games online (about 25000 hands) and my reasons for playing it is that this is what is played in casinos and I would eventually like to play live games so I see this as a training period. I also prefer to play a TAG game and my opinion is that 6-max is more suited to a LAG player.


However, everyone else I know who plays cash games plays 6-max and their main reason for doing this is that they say 6-max is more profitable for a winning player because they will be playing more hands vs the losing players..

What do you think? Do you agree ? Why do you play full-ring ? Why don't you play 6-max ?

ayurice 08-19-2007 04:34 PM

Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
 
They are right. 6-max is more profitable. There is also more variance. If you like fr, then play fr.

LearningCurve 08-19-2007 04:35 PM

Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
 
I played 6-max for most of the first 1/2 of this year. The variance is gross. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

ayurice 08-19-2007 04:39 PM

Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
I played 6-max for most of the first 1/2 of this year. The variance is gross. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Try limit if you want gross variance. [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

TheProdigy 08-19-2007 04:43 PM

Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
 
Yea,

I am slowly going to make a transition. It is obvious that it is much more suitable for my style anyways(16/13-18/13 or so at FR, I played 24/22 when I tried out some 6-max), but right now the profit at FR is so easy I can't convince myself to leave and learn a new game quite yet.

I don't mind variance because playing with a big BR would make it feel like it isn't bad at all and I would also drop down a level to play it so the money wouldn't be huge.

But if anyone wants to pay me 10k/month while learning to play 6-max I will gladly do it :P

Renton 08-19-2007 04:44 PM

Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
 
theres also more very good regs to deal with in six max.

Its a much more competitive game.

zyrrth 08-19-2007 04:47 PM

Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
 
My plan is to get solid at FR and then switch.

Mike Kelley 08-19-2007 04:50 PM

Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
theres also more very good regs to deal with in six max.

Its a much more competitive game.

[/ QUOTE ]

This was my experience. 3betting light is common down to 50NL 6Max, something you rarely see at 50NL FR.

phydaux 08-19-2007 04:57 PM

Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
 
Same reasons - I'm naturally a TAG so FR fits my personality, I prefer less varience, casino play is FR. Plus with so many pros and semi-pros playing 6-max, why the hell would I want to play that? Give me a table full of chumps, any day.

Also, I like being the most aggressive player at my table. 6-max players play back at me too much and take me off my game. I know i will need to adjust to good, aggressive players, but at FR you don't start seeing tables full of them until 100NL+. I'm still in the micros where TAG ABC play gets the money.

bkar824 08-19-2007 04:58 PM

Re: LC - Why don\'t you play 6 max ?
 
[ QUOTE ]

This was my experience. 3betting light is common down to 50NL 6Max, something you rarely see at 50NL FR.

[/ QUOTE ]

How light is light?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.