rogue mods again
 

user jordiepop link
had received a * from me. i went to bed and his title had been changed to 'grinder' with no user notes added. wtf.

Re: rogue mods again
 

I banned this troll (Obmar_) yesterday and made specific notes, and he was back posting like an hour later

Also, the total count of people changing my titles is somewhere around a dozen.

I'm going to have to start backing up my notes on posters, ffs.

Re: rogue mods again
 

Well, at least Ryan has records of reversed Bans.

Re: rogue mods again
 

Didnt you remove his star or did he get re-stared?

Re: rogue mods again
 

pm notifications look right for your bans, gildwulf.

And as for rogue mods...
Please stop. You suck, and I'll have to get extreme if you keep screwing around.

Have a nice day.

Re: rogue mods again
 

never me. I tag any changes I make.

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
pm notifications look right for your bans, gildwulf.

And as for rogue mods...
Please stop. You suck, and I'll have to get extreme if you keep screwing around.

Have a nice day.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe it didn't save or I am hallucinating? I dunno, people are definitely [censored] around though, no doubt about it.

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
pm notifications look right for your bans, gildwulf.

And as for rogue mods...
Please stop. You suck, and I'll have to get extreme if you keep screwing around.

Have a nice day.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe it didn't save or I am hallucinating? I dunno, people are definitely [censored] around though, no doubt about it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Gild - that happened to me once, we discovered it was user error - my mistake. Your right that someone is obviously removing custom titles, but the ban removal could have been a simple mistake.

Re: rogue mods again
 

Definitely not me. Who would do this?

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
Definitely not me. Who would do this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sounds exactly like what the culprit would say.

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Definitely not me. Who would do this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sounds exactly like what the culprit would say.

[/ QUOTE ]


Your response is exactly what the real culprit might say to build a smokescreen of confusion.

Re: rogue mods again
 

i told you guys in the other thread it was me. jeez.

Re: rogue mods again
 

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/ad....php?uid=92812

This dude lost two stars that he really, really earned. No notes.

Re: rogue mods again
 

that really sucks. bellagio player posts almost exclusively in:

b4l, golf, sporting events, bbv, oot.

i'm gonna go out on a limb and say that it isn't gild, adanthar, ryan, or mat, and i'm going to guess that it is someone who is a mod of one of those other forums, though obviously that's not a necessity.

let's go with lynch green because wtf, why does that account even still exist.

Re: rogue mods again
 

Not sure if stuey was kidding or not, but if he was, this goes back to at least 10/06:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...Number=7741615

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
that really sucks. bellagio player posts almost exclusively in:

b4l, golf, sporting events, bbv, oot.

i'm gonna go out on a limb and say that it isn't gild, adanthar, ryan, or mat, and i'm going to guess that it is someone who is a mod of one of those other forums, though obviously that's not a necessity.

let's go with lynch green because wtf, why does that account even still exist.

[/ QUOTE ]

We actually have a lot of unworking mods that still exist such as JBB, and Commodus - perhaps its time for a non-active mod trimming as a safety measure?

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
Not sure if stuey was kidding or not, but if he was, this goes back to at least 10/06:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...Number=7741615

[/ QUOTE ]

i don't know if this happened in the last 35 minutes since you posted this, but stuey isn't a mod

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
that really sucks. bellagio player posts almost exclusively in:

b4l, golf, sporting events, bbv, oot.

i'm gonna go out on a limb and say that it isn't gild, adanthar, ryan, or mat, and i'm going to guess that it is someone who is a mod of one of those other forums, though obviously that's not a necessity.

let's go with lynch green because wtf, why does that account even still exist.

[/ QUOTE ]

We actually have a lot of unworking mods that still exist such as JBB, and Commodus - perhaps its time for a non-active mod trimming as a safety measure?

[/ QUOTE ]

i personally guarantee you that Commodus is not removing *s without telling anyone

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
that really sucks. bellagio player posts almost exclusively in:

b4l, golf, sporting events, bbv, oot.

i'm gonna go out on a limb and say that it isn't gild, adanthar, ryan, or mat, and i'm going to guess that it is someone who is a mod of one of those other forums, though obviously that's not a necessity.

let's go with lynch green because wtf, why does that account even still exist.

[/ QUOTE ]

We actually have a lot of unworking mods that still exist such as JBB, and Commodus - perhaps its time for a non-active mod trimming as a safety measure?

[/ QUOTE ]

i personally guarantee you that Commodus is not removing *s without telling anyone

[/ QUOTE ]

I never claimed Commodus is... but i do think its time to trim down the moderator field to remove the inactive ones. The positive effect is that the smaller field makes it easier to determine who might be the rouge. I am not insinuating that the inactive mods are the leak, but it does make management easier by removing them.

Re: rogue mods again
 

TT,

i think that it is possible that commodus didn't want his identity to be openly discussed around here anymore, and has possibly gone to the extent of removing the original post where he revealed his id.

all,

durronisright. stuey admitted to screwing around about these things and was removed because of it. while it obviously isn't stuey any longer, the "problem" has been around for a while.

i don't think that there can be any harm from trimming back inactive mods, it's not like it's difficult to restore mod status if need be.

i'm also totally shocked at how poor the documentation for this software is. it really seems like this is the only messageboard in the world that uses this software, which is mildly upsetting, but understandable at times.

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
that really sucks. bellagio player posts almost exclusively in:

b4l, golf, sporting events, bbv, oot.

i'm gonna go out on a limb and say that it isn't gild, adanthar, ryan, or mat, and i'm going to guess that it is someone who is a mod of one of those other forums, though obviously that's not a necessity.

let's go with lynch green because wtf, why does that account even still exist.

[/ QUOTE ]

We actually have a lot of unworking mods that still exist such as JBB, and Commodus - perhaps its time for a non-active mod trimming as a safety measure?

[/ QUOTE ]

i personally guarantee you that Commodus is not removing *s without telling anyone

[/ QUOTE ]

I never claimed Commodus is... but i do think its time to trim down the moderator field to remove the inactive ones. The positive effect is that the smaller field makes it easier to determine who might be the rouge. I am not insinuating that the inactive mods are the leak, but it does make management easier by removing them.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with TT. I think it's time for a cleanup of inactive mods.

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Not sure if stuey was kidding or not, but if he was, this goes back to at least 10/06:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...Number=7741615

[/ QUOTE ]

i don't know if this happened in the last 35 minutes since you posted this, but stuey isn't a mod

[/ QUOTE ]

right, so if he was kidding at the time and it's not him, at least one guy has been doing this since 10/06.

edit: oic, I wasn't aware of the stuey thing

Re: rogue mods again
 

I am not doing any of these things. Just FYI.

Felicia [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: rogue mods again
 

I'd be in favor of culling the herd a bit.

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'd be in favor of culling the herd a bit.

[/ QUOTE ]

Inactive mods could just be made green in color only like cnfuzzd.

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Not sure if stuey was kidding or not, but if he was, this goes back to at least 10/06:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...Number=7741615

[/ QUOTE ]

i don't know if this happened in the last 35 minutes since you posted this, but stuey isn't a mod

[/ QUOTE ]

right, so if he was kidding at the time and it's not him, at least one guy has been doing this since 10/06.

edit: oic, I wasn't aware of the stuey thing

[/ QUOTE ]

he was doing it and was removed as a result

i've said it before but i'm 99% sure it's one of the HSNL mods (none in particular, but rather they are the ones who never show up when mat sklansky does things like ask for ppl to do a roll call)

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]


i'm also totally shocked at how poor the documentation for this software is. it really seems like this is the only messageboard in the world that uses this software, which is mildly upsetting, but understandable at times.

[/ QUOTE ]

according to bigboards, we are by far the largest implementation of ubbthreads. period.

according to chuck, they give us almost no technical support.

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
TT,

i think that it is possible that commodus didn't want his identity to be openly discussed around here anymore, and has possibly gone to the extent of removing the original post where he revealed his id.

[/ QUOTE ]

sorry, thats news to me.

Re: rogue mods again
 

d,

"the ones who never show up when mat sklansky does things like ask for ppl to do a roll call"

There are roll calls in the mod forum?

Re: rogue mods again
 

El D,

There's been like... One? It was at some point during the Degen/Sniper drama a call for culling back super inactive mods who don't read the mod forum last occurred. In theory "somewhat active" reading of this forum is a requirement, and those who miss a thread titled "RESPOND HERE IF YOU WANT TO STAY A MOD" are reasonable candidates for having not read here.

Re: rogue mods again
 

durron,

BTW, I suspect there are MULTIPLE factions of rogue mods at work. Well, actually, I know this for a fact.

Re: rogue mods again
 

Not that getting rid of inactive mods would be bad, but the response of you guys to someone messing around with bans/others mod notes is to say lets get rid of inactive mods? I'd say its wayyyyyyyyy more likely that whoever is doing it is a pretty active mod.

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
TT,

i think that it is possible that commodus didn't want his identity to be openly discussed around here anymore, and has possibly gone to the extent of removing the original post where he revealed his id.

[/ QUOTE ]

sorry, thats news to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pretty sure the old post is still there, but he's asked that people not flaunt the fact that they know who he is by mentioning it in new threads.

Re: rogue mods again
 

the odds of it being someone in this thread are like nil

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
the odds of it being someone in this thread are like nil

[/ QUOTE ]

i've always thought that ahnuld character was pretty shady btw

Re: rogue mods again
 

ahnuld,

"the odds of it being someone in this thread are like nil"

I have removed multiple custom titles.

Re: rogue mods again
 

Is there a possiblity is it the fault of the software?

Re: rogue mods again
 

I don't understand what removing Commodus and Green does that's beneficial. Both of them have other accounts that have mod powers.

Re: rogue mods again
 

El D,

Why have you done so?

EMc,

It is very unlikely that a software fault would remove one custom title and replace it with a totally different custom title.

Re: rogue mods again
 

[ QUOTE ]
the odds of it being someone in this thread are like nil

[/ QUOTE ]
Hi!




...phew