Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   I REALLY don't like folding...especially sets. (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=555174)

loosbastard 11-26-2007 11:17 PM

Re: I REALLY don\'t like folding...especially sets.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Come on, this guy's a nit. Sets are a huge part of his range, what makes this a call IMO is that we can put JJ and some QQ combos in his range.

[/ QUOTE ]

Only thing about QQ+ is they always seems to just C/R flop.

I mean I obviously stacked off here, which is why I hate posting these...but I just hated it because there really aren't any realistic 2 pair combos other than 8T (which I think he folds pre). Although w/ this small of a sample, I agree w/ getting it in.

Now would this be closer if I had, let's say, 1k hands on this guy w/ the same stats?

ikestoys 11-26-2007 11:22 PM

Re: I REALLY don\'t like folding...especially sets.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
good, we havent had this thread yet today

[/ QUOTE ]

Come on, this guy's a nit. Sets are a huge part of his range, what makes this a call IMO is that we can put JJ and some QQ combos in his range.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah huh... its not close

Speedlimits 11-26-2007 11:23 PM

Re: I REALLY don\'t like folding...especially sets.
 
shove.

loosbastard 11-26-2007 11:25 PM

Re: I REALLY don\'t like folding...especially sets.
 
[ QUOTE ]

yeah huh... its not close

[/ QUOTE ]

Sigh...well it clearly is.

**********

Board: 8h 2s 4c Th
Dead:

Hand 0: 59.943% { 2c2h }
Hand 1: 40.057% { KK+, TT, 88, 44, T8s }

***********

And that's assuming he always plays KK+ this way, which is clearly not even close to true. A nit cold-calling pre w/ T8s is also a pretty big stretch...but since he's closing the action, I put it in there anyways.

And if you take out over-pairs:

Board: 8h 2s 4c Th
Dead:

Hand 0: 24.432% { 22 }
Hand 1: 75.568% { TT, 88, 44, T8s }


ikestoys 11-26-2007 11:33 PM

Re: I REALLY don\'t like folding...especially sets.
 
lol if you put him on a range tighter than a virgins [censored] its close...

in the real world, its not.

loosbastard 11-26-2007 11:36 PM

Re: I REALLY don\'t like folding...especially sets.
 
[ QUOTE ]
lol if you put him on a range tighter than a virgins [censored] its close...

in the real world, its not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Meh...you're right. Just one of those sessions.

Would a larger sample make this any closer?

ikestoys 11-26-2007 11:39 PM

Re: I REALLY don\'t like folding...especially sets.
 
no

grando 11-26-2007 11:39 PM

Re: I REALLY don\'t like folding...especially sets.
 
wtf come on guys this is a fold

do you guys felt AA here? cause it's the same hand

he has T8 about 0.036% of the time

Unknown Soldier 11-26-2007 11:41 PM

Re: I REALLY don\'t like folding...especially sets.
 
loosbastard i used to think like you, but then i came to realise that nits are among the worst poker players in the game, they overvalue their hands waaay more then they should given their image.

This isn't close.

Speedlimits 11-26-2007 11:41 PM

Re: I REALLY don\'t like folding...especially sets.
 
[ QUOTE ]
wtf come on guys this is a fold

do you guys felt AA here? cause it's the same hand

he has T8 about 0.036% of the time

[/ QUOTE ]

[] leveled


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.