Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Micro Stakes Limit (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   Testing the rake at .25 -.50 limit on FTP (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=549033)

formula72 11-18-2007 03:18 PM

Testing the rake at .25 -.50 limit on FTP
 
I am putting aside $200 dollars to test out the lowest limit to see if i can beat a 5% rake with poor players and if so how much. I plan on 4-6 tableing 9 handed games and play until I reach 50,000 hands. I know it sounds fullish but is is a cheaper way to find out. I plan on it taking me about two months. Has anybody ever tried this? Any sugggestions?

tyler_cracker 11-18-2007 03:20 PM

Re: Testing the rake at .25 -.50 limit on FTP
 
you're right; that does sound fullish.

formula72 11-18-2007 03:26 PM

Re: Testing the rake at .25 -.50 limit on FTP *DELETED*
 
Post deleted by OziBattler

kerowo 11-18-2007 03:54 PM

Re: Testing the rake at .25 -.50 limit on FTP
 
Why? If you can't beat the rake you aren't a winning player, so it's easy to see. Is your WR > 0? The last thing to worry about at the micros is the rake. Maybe if you are playing live and have a choice among card rooms it will come into play, but other than that, why bother?

What you are doing goes by a different name, it's called Playing Poker.

Smurph64 11-18-2007 04:35 PM

Re: Testing the rake at .25 -.50 limit on FTP
 
bottom line the rake is around 4bb/100 +/- .75bb if you play $1 6 max at 28% VPIP.

FR I think should be slightly lower but its been so long I have never done a direct analysis.

neurotiq 11-18-2007 04:43 PM

Re: Testing the rake at .25 -.50 limit on FTP
 
[ QUOTE ]
Has anybody ever tried this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. Many people on this site have successfully beaten $0.25/$0.50, especially before moving up to higher levels.

DavidC 11-18-2007 05:01 PM

Re: Testing the rake at .25 -.50 limit on FTP
 
1) totally retarded idea, in terms of $/hr

2) I admit, my curiosity about these things is eating at my soul, seriously (you'd have to know me to know that I'm telling the truth here)... so I'd like to know the results of your experiment. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Good luck, have fun, and please don't stop at like 5,000 hands. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

---

Actually, on second thought, yeah, I've beaten like 3.5bb/100 rakes in the past for extended periods, so I'd say it's beatable.

If it was 5% of pot uncapped, that'd be interesting... You'd probalby have to play pretty tight, both preflop and post-flop.

Bulletproof Monk 11-18-2007 05:15 PM

Re: Testing the rake at .25 -.50 limit on FTP
 
THIS IS VERY FULLISH

Dankenstein 11-18-2007 05:25 PM

Re: Testing the rake at .25 -.50 limit on FTP
 
Brag: I beat .25/.50 rake !

ckj 11-18-2007 05:57 PM

Re: Testing the rake at .25 -.50 limit on FTP
 
Just get rakeback at full tilt and the rake won't be so harsh.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.