getting freaky (hand analysis is needed, title is misleading)
 

i decided to play this hand this wierdly because the villain involved was trying to take control of most hands she was involved in and seemed to be quite agressive post flop. dont care about preflop, so just leave that out!

what do you think of my line, hate or like? also how would you play it differently?

Full Tilt Poker
Pot Limit Omaha Ring game
Blinds: $2/$4
5 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is CO with J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
UTG folds, Hero calls, Button calls, <font color="#cc0000">SB raises to $20</font>, BB folds, Hero calls, Button folds.

Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($48, 2 players)
SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $28</font>, SB calls.

Turn: 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($104, 2 players)
SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $60</font>, <font color="#cc0000">SB raises to $140</font>, Hero calls.

River: Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ($384, 2 players)
SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $124</font>, SB folds.
Uncalled bets: $124 returned to Hero.

Results:
Final pot: $384

Re: getting freaky (hand analysis is needed, title is misleading)
 

Just 3-bet turn

Re: getting freaky (hand analysis is needed, title is misleading)
 

I like the call on the turn because villain is first to act on flop,
he may bet the river and if he doesnt you bet will look more like a bluff.

All seems fine to me, hard to go wrong when you have such a strong hand.

Re: getting freaky (hand analysis is needed, title is misleading)
 

include stack sizes, 3 bet turn, bet the river bigger, probably bet the other streets a little bigger too.

Re: getting freaky (hand analysis is needed, title is misleading)
 

Unanswerable without stack sizes.

Re: getting freaky (hand analysis is needed, title is misleading)
 

[ QUOTE ]
I like the call on the turn because villain is first to act on flop,
he may bet the river and if he doesnt you bet will look more like a bluff.

All seems fine to me, hard to go wrong when you have such a strong hand.

[/ QUOTE ]
Please stop posting imo.

And it's not just this thread, but you are so way off in every hand you post in, I suspect this could be a gimmick account. Stop it please

Re: getting freaky (hand analysis is needed, title is misleading)
 

she had around $520 ish and i covered, i remember villain was called something like ingrid yente