Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Televised Poker (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible) (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=534145)

Kevmath 10-29-2007 08:17 PM

High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
Tonight's the last show before the 500k min buyin game that will start next week, expect lots of discussion about your favorite players and 2+2 players.

john voight 10-29-2007 08:22 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
1.

westhoff 10-29-2007 08:31 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Tonight's the last show before the 500k min buyin game that will start next week, expect lots of unintelligent discussion about your favorite players and 2+2 players.

[/ QUOTE ]

fyp

Micro Donk 10-29-2007 08:59 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
last weeks thread needs to be locked, its turned into...bad

edit: rofl lovely, galfond raises that first hand on the air after all that stuff

edit2: crap more fuel for the fire

Dynasty 10-29-2007 09:04 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
JMan mucking the winning hand is going to bring back a lot of critics.

liquid 10-29-2007 09:05 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
Uh oh.

88jayhawks 10-29-2007 09:05 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
phil mucked his hand in a chopped pot...oops

bronx bomber 10-29-2007 09:06 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
Nah, he's not a Nit......

illdonk 10-29-2007 09:06 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
Oh dear.

Landonfan 10-29-2007 09:06 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
jman looks so [censored] uncomfortable.

bsheck 10-29-2007 09:06 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
Not gonna berate him. He didn't think it was good and probably didn't want anyone to know he was raising with T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].

ImGoodToGo 10-29-2007 09:08 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
why does gold do that before a fold?

why can't he just fold?

JJBuffone 10-29-2007 09:10 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Uh oh.

[/ QUOTE ]

Micro Donk 10-29-2007 09:12 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
at least theyll stop talking about how galfond will only play top 10 hands

jjshabado 10-29-2007 09:13 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
at least theyll stop talking about how galfond will only play top 10 hands

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know... I think to count as 'playing' a hand you have to show it down when it wins part of the pot. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Not a hater.

Dromar 10-29-2007 09:14 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
Nothin' but Galfond for the first 3 hands this episode.

And yeah, "Uh oh" is right.

Micro Donk 10-29-2007 09:19 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
at least theyll stop talking about how galfond will only play top 10 hands

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know... I think to count as 'playing' a hand you have to show it down when it wins part of the pot. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Not a hater.

[/ QUOTE ]

prob should have waited but i would find it hard to believe my T7 would win part on a AKJJ7 board...figured someone wuold show a K or something but they never did...

jjshabado 10-29-2007 09:21 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
at least theyll stop talking about how galfond will only play top 10 hands

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know... I think to count as 'playing' a hand you have to show it down when it wins part of the pot. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Not a hater.

[/ QUOTE ]

prob should have waited but i would find it hard to believe my T7 would win part on a AKJJ7 board...figured someone wuold show a K or something but they never did...

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? It checked around 3 times. That tells me I've got a non-trivial chance of winning with my 7. But whatever, we all make mistakes.

Micro Donk 10-29-2007 09:22 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
6 way? its harsd for me to think so but id still hang onto my cards until i saw a better hand. no big though, he only lost the 4500 he raised...

Landonfan 10-29-2007 09:26 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
He lost ~10k more that he would've won in the chop.

Micro Donk 10-29-2007 09:28 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
yes but thats what, 10bb with straddle...a mistake but not a major one

illdonk 10-29-2007 09:34 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
Actually, he lost something like $13.5K.

Micro Donk 10-29-2007 09:35 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
i know about the whole chop thing, didnt feel like calculating it though...but still 10-11 bb, nothing big

ImGoodToGo 10-29-2007 09:37 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
150k more??

Dynasty 10-29-2007 09:38 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
150k more??

[/ QUOTE ]

The % chance Sammy folds is not zero.

Dromar 10-29-2007 09:39 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
150k more??

[/ QUOTE ]

He felt like shutting out the other players in the hand. Ya know, the guys who'll call huge prices to see a flop.

NickyC 10-29-2007 09:42 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
I feel bad for Daniel. He has that same degen face I've seen a thousand times in a casino at 4AM.

primetime32 10-29-2007 09:42 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Nah, he's not a Nit......

[/ QUOTE ]

wow, he mucks a pair?? that is classic. Yeah, lets see people defend his live play now.

Micro Donk 10-29-2007 09:47 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nah, he's not a Nit......

[/ QUOTE ]

wow, he mucks a pair?? that is classic. Yeah, lets see people defend his live play now.

[/ QUOTE ]

at least the live donks could have waited till the show ended to attack

JJBuffone 10-29-2007 09:49 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
I loved Gabe's comment about Gold not value betting. He could have won soooooooo much more money this session it's not even funny.

primetime32 10-29-2007 09:50 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nah, he's not a Nit......

[/ QUOTE ]

wow, he mucks a pair?? that is classic. Yeah, lets see people defend his live play now.

[/ QUOTE ]

at least the live donks could have waited till the show ended to attack

[/ QUOTE ]

People come on here and attack hellmuth and farha and negreanu if they make bad plays. He chose to be on the show. Therefore, people can attack his play. No one is saying he is a bad player, but there is no need to defend someone who mucks a pair in that spot. The players with 4-4 didn't muck.

Teh1337zor 10-29-2007 09:52 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
people with a brain need to stop caring that people without a brain think jman sucks

Dynasty 10-29-2007 09:55 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
Phil's not doing good at counting his opponents' outs.

Micro Donk 10-29-2007 09:56 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
except it wasnt a bad play, it wasnt even during the hand, it was a showdown. was a mistake, and id say it was a mistake and not a bad play if anyone else done it either...it happens. but oh well.

JJBuffone 10-29-2007 09:56 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
What is it about money that you hate? lolol

Dynasty 10-29-2007 09:57 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
LOL. Sammy even wants to chop his insurance deals.

Dromar 10-29-2007 09:57 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Nah, he's not a Nit......

[/ QUOTE ]

wow, he mucks a pair?? that is classic. Yeah, lets see people defend his live play now.

[/ QUOTE ]

at least the live donks could have waited till the show ended to attack

[/ QUOTE ]

People come on here and attack hellmuth and farha and negreanu if they make bad plays. He chose to be on the show. Therefore, people can attack his play. No one is saying he is a bad player, but there is no need to defend someone who mucks a pair in that spot. The players with 4-4 didn't muck.

[/ QUOTE ]

I will admit that mucking a hand before seeing a better hand tabled is a noobish mistake. I feel sorry for him having that broadcasted on TV

JackWhite 10-29-2007 09:58 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
If they can ban prop betting, why can't they ban this Hellmuth insurance crap.

primetime32 10-29-2007 10:00 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
except it wasnt a bad play, it wasnt even during the hand, it was a showdown. was a mistake, and id say it was a mistake and not a bad play if anyone else done it either...it happens. but oh well.

[/ QUOTE ]

He is still a great player, but that fold is still a classic. If Jamie Gold did that on his first episode of HSP how do you think people would have reacted on this board?

sapol 10-29-2007 10:00 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
WOW !! that next episode trailer was the sickest [censored] ever !!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:49 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.