Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Televised Poker (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible) (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=534145)

bsheck 10-29-2007 09:06 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
Not gonna berate him. He didn't think it was good and probably didn't want anyone to know he was raising with T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img].

ImGoodToGo 10-29-2007 09:08 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
why does gold do that before a fold?

why can't he just fold?

JJBuffone 10-29-2007 09:10 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Uh oh.

[/ QUOTE ]

Micro Donk 10-29-2007 09:12 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
at least theyll stop talking about how galfond will only play top 10 hands

jjshabado 10-29-2007 09:13 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
at least theyll stop talking about how galfond will only play top 10 hands

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know... I think to count as 'playing' a hand you have to show it down when it wins part of the pot. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Not a hater.

Dromar 10-29-2007 09:14 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
Nothin' but Galfond for the first 3 hands this episode.

And yeah, "Uh oh" is right.

Micro Donk 10-29-2007 09:19 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
at least theyll stop talking about how galfond will only play top 10 hands

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know... I think to count as 'playing' a hand you have to show it down when it wins part of the pot. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Not a hater.

[/ QUOTE ]

prob should have waited but i would find it hard to believe my T7 would win part on a AKJJ7 board...figured someone wuold show a K or something but they never did...

jjshabado 10-29-2007 09:21 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
at least theyll stop talking about how galfond will only play top 10 hands

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know... I think to count as 'playing' a hand you have to show it down when it wins part of the pot. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Not a hater.

[/ QUOTE ]

prob should have waited but i would find it hard to believe my T7 would win part on a AKJJ7 board...figured someone wuold show a K or something but they never did...

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? It checked around 3 times. That tells me I've got a non-trivial chance of winning with my 7. But whatever, we all make mistakes.

Micro Donk 10-29-2007 09:22 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
6 way? its harsd for me to think so but id still hang onto my cards until i saw a better hand. no big though, he only lost the 4500 he raised...

Landonfan 10-29-2007 09:26 PM

Re: High Stakes Poker thread (10/29 - spoilers possible)
 
He lost ~10k more that he would've won in the chop.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.