Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   High Stakes MTT (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=89)
-   -   33 in CO 14xBB (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=550626)

betgo 11-20-2007 02:04 PM

33 in CO 14xBB
 
I got this hand from a video. $1K MTT. Blinds 75/150. You have 2050 in CO and it is folded to you with 33. Players to act have you covered. What is your play?

Zugwat 11-20-2007 02:15 PM

Re: 33 in CO 14xBB
 
fold

with no antes raise / calling is terrible, and raise folding is terrible with ur stack size

djk123 11-20-2007 02:28 PM

Re: 33 in CO 14xBB
 
my instinct is to shove

Zugwat 11-20-2007 02:32 PM

Re: 33 in CO 14xBB
 
[ QUOTE ]
my instinct is to shove

[/ QUOTE ]

im one of the spewiest of the spewtards out there, and i think shoving is terrible

theres 225 chips in the pot....

djk123 11-20-2007 02:37 PM

Re: 33 in CO 14xBB
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
my instinct is to shove

[/ QUOTE ]

im one of the spewiest of the spewtards out there, and i think shoving is terrible

theres 225 chips in the pot....

[/ QUOTE ]

ya.. but why we got a pair [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

it cud easily be answered with sngpt. i bet it's close.

KingDan 11-20-2007 02:39 PM

Re: 33 in CO 14xBB
 
shoving is never bad here (against 44+ its breakeven IIRC), and against some people its v +ev.

Todd Terry 11-20-2007 02:40 PM

Re: 33 in CO 14xBB
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
my instinct is to shove

[/ QUOTE ]

im one of the spewiest of the spewtards out there, and i think shoving is terrible

theres 225 chips in the pot....

[/ QUOTE ]

ya.. but why we got a pair [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

it cud easily be answered with sngpt. i bet it's close.

[/ QUOTE ]

Shoving faceup is not unexploitable, but it's very close, I think the worst case is cEV = -4 chips. It's +cEV against any reasonable calling range, but not very significantly so.

Edit: I take it back, shoving faceup is going to be unexploitably +cEV. There does exist a calling range that makes shoving -cEV, {44+}, but that will not be the calling range, at least in the BB, if we shove faceup.

Zugwat 11-20-2007 02:54 PM

Re: 33 in CO 14xBB
 
ok ok i take back what i said about shoving is terrible, maybe i need to learn how to use sng powertools or whatever it is where u can figure all this stuff out, it just seemed like you had too many chips for it to be a smart shove

i'm relatively new to tournamnets and am new to 2+2 so i value such superstars like DJK and KingDan's opinion over mine for what its worth

oldschool043 11-20-2007 02:58 PM

Re: 33 in CO 14xBB
 
zugwat got zugwatted imo

i shove fwiw

betgo 11-20-2007 03:05 PM

Re: 33 in CO 14xBB
 
This is from a Bax video. He folds it.

I am pretty sure pushing is significantly cEV+. It is standard to push a pp in mid position for 10xBB. Sklansky gives it is cEV+ to push 33 from the SB face up for 28xBB.

In fact though, you are not pushing face up. 44-66 usually fold and AK/AQ almost always call.

You are 37% against a calling range of 77+, ATs+, AJo+, KQs. This is 8% of the hand, so you get called maybe 22% of the time.

You pick up 225 when you steal and lose about 450 when you are called. .78 * 225 - .22 * 450 = +76 chips or 1/2 of a big blind. I can't see how you could work it so it wouldn't be cEV+.

I think pushing is a little better than raise/calling here, but I think that is really the only question, whether to raise/call or push.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.