Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   MOD DISCUSSION (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=52)
-   -   Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=523779)

Pokeraddict 10-16-2007 09:41 PM

Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
 
Koko333 (Shawn) works for Bonuswhores.com a site which blacklised AP already. I'm pretty sure he took over my job when we all walked away in December 2006. He is not relevent to any of this AP mess. The others will require more research.

Costaricabill is a large AP affiliate close to the AP guys. He certainly knows all involved but I would seriously doubt he has any involvement. It's likely he just posted from AP.

Jim Kuhn 10-16-2007 10:38 PM

Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
 
I think Shawn worked for AP last year. That is why his posting ip showed AP. Costaricabill was living with Shawn several months ago. Neither is probably involved with this mess but probably know some of the parties that are. I was just digging via the AP ip associated accounts that were listed in this thread.

Thank you,

Jim Kuhn
Catfish4u
[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

citanul 10-16-2007 11:18 PM

Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
 
tomorrow, the freakanomics blog will have a piece (again) on the situation, and will quote/link to a couple of the latest threads here.

xorbie 10-17-2007 07:51 PM

Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
 
[ QUOTE ]
tomorrow, the freakanomics blog will have a piece (again) on the situation, and will quote/link to a couple of the latest threads here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Link to blog, please.

durron597 10-17-2007 07:58 PM

Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
tomorrow, the freakanomics blog will have a piece (again) on the situation, and will quote/link to a couple of the latest threads here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Link to blog, please.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/20...lown-wide-open/

Nick B. 10-17-2007 09:18 PM

Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
 
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f236/tepop/ap.jpg

*TT* 10-17-2007 09:28 PM

Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
 
[ QUOTE ]
http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f236/tepop/ap.jpg

[/ QUOTE ]

thats an affiliate ad, we cant expect 2+2 to control that, when Mason said there was no ads I think he meant directly from UB or Absolute. Mat could send an email advising all affiliates look into the Absolute Poker rumors so they can make their own decisions of course.

Ryan Beal 10-17-2007 10:38 PM

Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
 
Most probably won't make that distinction, though. They'll just note that AP and their logo are still being displayed on 2+2, advising you to click for a sweet deal. People will still want to point fingers at us even if it's indirect.

El Diablo 10-17-2007 10:41 PM

Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
 
TT,

"thats an affiliate ad, we cant expect 2+2 to control that"

Huh? Of course users should expect 2+2 to control that.

Gildwulf 10-17-2007 10:44 PM

Re: Will 2+2 have a response or position on the AP fiasco?
 
we should not have absolute on our website period, even as an affiliate


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.