Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Televised Poker (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   ESPN analysts miscues (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=534899)

djsnit 10-30-2007 08:35 PM

ESPN analysts miscues
 
How many times do I have to listen to these guys before they get it right?
Amnon still has Queen's up!?
On a 99Q9 board??
Where do they get these guys?

Micro Donk 10-30-2007 08:37 PM

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 
you dont play omaha eh...

he does have queens up in that spot. why do you think barry wasnt drawing dead with his FD?

rsigley 10-30-2007 08:40 PM

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 
[ QUOTE ]
you dont play omaha eh...

he does have queens up in that spot. why do you think barry wasnt drawing dead with his FD?

[/ QUOTE ]

because he had 999XX where XX = 2 highest cards from his hand, not queens up

john voight 10-30-2007 10:50 PM

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you dont play omaha eh...

he does have queens up in that spot. why do you think barry wasnt drawing dead with his FD?

[/ QUOTE ]

because he had 999XX where XX = 2 highest cards from his hand, not queens up

[/ QUOTE ]

you obv dont play much omaha either

TimTimSalabim 10-30-2007 11:16 PM

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 
[ QUOTE ]
you dont play omaha eh...

he does have queens up in that spot. why do you think barry wasnt drawing dead with his FD?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because a flush beats 3 9's, has nothing to do with queens up.

sneaks619 10-31-2007 10:12 AM

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 
[ QUOTE ]
How many times do I have to listen to these guys before they get it right?
Amnon still has Queen's up!?
On a 99Q9 board??
Where do they get these guys?

[/ QUOTE ]

well they did not get them from the same poker school that you went to. It would go something like this if they did "barry is all in drawing dead with only a flush draw, and the heart hits on the river and barry makes his flush but it is still no good, But wait they are pushing the pot to barry and OMG amnon is not even complaining, what is this madness"

quirkasaurus 10-31-2007 10:22 AM

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 
on that board, amnon had trip 9's, not queens-up.

( i thought the term "queens-up" meant 2-pair, queens high... )

at any case, amnon doesn't have a full house...

Lottery Larry 10-31-2007 12:01 PM

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
because he had 999XX where XX = 2 highest cards from his hand, not queens up

[/ QUOTE ]

you obv dont play much omaha either

[/ QUOTE ]


Ummmmm.... what? On a 99Q9 board, what hand does 2345 have? JT72? QATJ?

JoeyClutch 10-31-2007 12:08 PM

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 
trip 9's with a 45 kicker
trip 9's with a J10 kicker
trip 9's with a AQ kicker

Eponymous 10-31-2007 07:21 PM

Re: ESPN analysts miscues
 
somebody at least should give the OP props for being right about his post since he took so much crap. he never said he had a full house, he said he didn't have queens up, which he didn't. he had trip 9s with AQ.

OP: props


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.