1.10/45 Sats vs 1.10/45 Turbos
 

Sats pay 11 T$ to top 4, Turbos are 14 for first, 10 second, 7 third, 5 fifth, 3/2 sixth/seventh.

I'm thinking I can abuse the sat more, especially on a FT. Big stacks that I want to avoid tangling with with FE will fold, and when I'm the big stack (frequent occurance, but in the turbo even my big stack is a crapshoot), I can fold to my pay.

However, one is twice as fast as the other, which affects my hourly. I'm unsure of where to best invest my time?

Re: 1.10/45 Sats vs 1.10/45 Turbos
 

Bleh; after a few hours of playing my general consensus is that I hate 10 minute blinds in a 45 because it diffuses my aggression ramping with the levels and keeping my tables confused.

That + I'm pretty sure these sats are not as soft as the turbos simply on fact that the people who have realized they exist can breathe, which puts them above half the field of a typical 45.

Re: 1.10/45 Sats vs 1.10/45 Turbos
 

I think if you want to play sats you are better off with the 2.20's that pay a bunch of entries. They have turbos and regular speed so whichever you prefer.

Re: 1.10/45 Sats vs 1.10/45 Turbos
 

Yeah pretty much what I'm sticking to.


I can easily grind these 2.20s all day too, the lower variance will be enjoyable.

Re: 1.10/45 Sats vs 1.10/45 Turbos
 

Yeah, and it shouldn't be hard to get 30 or 40 seats this week.

Re: 1.10/45 Sats vs 1.10/45 Turbos
 

Except when...twice in one night I get called down by huge donks with nothing and get sucked out on.



These tournies = Soft. PSTars cold decking me is getting pretty [censored] hard :-/

Re: 1.10/45 Sats vs 1.10/45 Turbos
 

[ QUOTE ]
These tournies = Soft.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

Re: 1.10/45 Sats vs 1.10/45 Turbos
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
These tournies = Soft.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

In other news:
-The Sky is Blue
-My Left Hand Hurts
-There's a Hole in my Wall

Re: 1.10/45 Sats vs 1.10/45 Turbos
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
These tournies = Soft.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL @ understatement

Final table, 5 left. Remember, these pay 4 seats:

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t600 (5 handed) internettexasholdem.com

BB (t1269)
UTG (t38940)
MP (t1100)
Button (t17666)
Hero (t8525)

Preflop: Hero is SB with 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to t38890</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, Button calls t17616 (All-In), <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, BB calls t619 (All-In).

Flop: (t57325) 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 2 all-in)</font>

Turn: (t57325) 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 2 all-in)</font>

River: (t57325) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(3 players, 2 all-in)</font>

Final Pot: t57325

Results below:
BB has Ah Ac (one pair, aces).
UTG has 2s 2d (one pair, twos).
Button has Kh As (high card, ace).
Outcome: UTG wins t55218. BB wins t2107.

Re: 1.10/45 Sats vs 1.10/45 Turbos
 

hmm, sry, where are those 2.20 on stars? ==&gt; not the DSO u were talking about?