Re: On a scale of 1-10, how stupid is this?
 

[ QUOTE ]
This concept ain't real difficult.

You guys are obviously betting all your hopeless hands like 67 and 22 in villain's shoes.

[/ QUOTE ]

You call a big limp reraise with those hands?

Re: On a scale of 1-10, how stupid is this?
 

This nails his range pretty much, and his smallish bet looks like it's BEGGING for call or raise, so I'd say about a 9 on the 1-10 scale.

Re: On a scale of 1-10, how stupid is this?
 

It is funny that everyone hated it before results were posted, then everyone loves it cos he made villain fold... so what, 2+2 = "results central"!?!?!?

This really isn't that good, his range that would come to flop with you has you beat here. You essentially have a gutshot, an A or K on the turn/river doesn't even necessarily make you the winner given his range. You've said that you're in an incredile downswing lately and this is just not something to get you back on the winning track. Villain's probably misplayed the hand if he really just came to flop with junk that had to be laid down.

Re: On a scale of 1-10, how stupid is this?
 

[ QUOTE ]
This concept ain't real difficult.

You guys are obviously betting all your hopeless hands like 67 and 22 in villain's shoes.

[/ QUOTE ]

we would never have these hands.

Re: On a scale of 1-10, how stupid is this?
 

flop=15

Re: On a scale of 1-10, how stupid is this?
 

I don't know what the hell calls a limp-reraise to 100.

Re: On a scale of 1-10, how stupid is this?
 

I think the flop is terrible personally, even after seeing results.

Re: On a scale of 1-10, how stupid is this?
 

This is bad, off the scales

Re: On a scale of 1-10, how stupid is this?
 

why couldnt a really thinking vilian put hero on exactly AA in the situation (especially if he hasnt seen hero do it before) and fold KK, (and even QQ sometimes if hes crazy)

Re: On a scale of 1-10, how stupid is this?
 

hate it. he has 99+ too often