NL25 QJ v loose-passive
 

Just moved back up to 25NL. Almost everyone plays TAG from my stats except the short stacks.

Full Tilt Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.10/$0.25
4 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $36.45
hero: $29
SB: $24.25
BB: $12.90

Pre-flop: (4 players) hero is Button with Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
UTG folds, <font color="#cc0000">hero raises to $0.85</font>, SB folds, BB calls.

Flop: 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($1.8, 2 players)
BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">hero bets $1</font>, BB calls.

Turn: 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($3.8, 2 players)
<font color="#cc0000">BB bets $3.8</font>, hero calls.

River: A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($11.4, 2 players)
BB checks. Hero..?


No reads really. Loose-passive, short stack. Do we value bet, check behind? Any mistakes anywhere in this hand?

Re: NL25 QJ v loose-passive
 

Flush got there, plus a paired board with an Ace on it, and villain showed strength on turn... Only a better hand is calling you so an obvious check behind IMO

Re: NL25 QJ v loose-passive
 

I don't know if only a better hand calls, but there aren't many worse hands that can call. So you should check.

Re: NL25 QJ v loose-passive
 

Was turn a call?

Re: NL25 QJ v loose-passive
 

[ QUOTE ]
Was turn a call?

[/ QUOTE ]

I would have called.

Re: NL25 QJ v loose-passive
 

i would probably call the turn too, because his line doesn't make much sense. i know i have a Q though, so i'll look him up, once anyway.

Re: NL25 QJ v loose-passive
 

strange line by villain here

check behind and make a note about his hand and how he played it [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]