(39) BLUFF no. 3
 

Villain is 29/6 and we have some hands together.
Of the three so far, this one seems the least interesting, and maybe even standard?

Poker Stars, $36 + $3 NL Hold'em Tournament, 10/20 Blinds, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

UTG: 1,420
Hero (MP): 1,490
CO: 2,210
BTN: 1,280
SB: 1,120
BB: 1,480

Pre-Flop: (30) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (MP)
UTG folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to 70</font>, CO folds, BTN calls 70, 2 folds

Flop: (170) 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets 140</font>, BTN calls 140

Turn: (450) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
Hero checks, BTN checks

River: (450) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets 300</font>,

Re: (39) BLUFF no. 3
 

what range do you put him on?
what hands do you expect him to fold?
what hands do you expect him to call?

//edit
I limp 22-99 at 10/20 and I rarely bluff in the early levels since it's a waste of chips most of the time.

Re: (39) BLUFF no. 3
 

5s are beat here

Re: (39) BLUFF no. 3
 

[ QUOTE ]
5s are beat here

[/ QUOTE ]

Dya think?

Re: (39) BLUFF no. 3
 

[ QUOTE ]
5s are beat here

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
Re: (39) BLUFF no. 3

[/ QUOTE ]


This guy is a [censored] genius I tell you!

Re: (39) BLUFF no. 3
 

and mike, i dont like it too much in this spot. i understand the thinking behind it but the 39 game play and this players stats lead me to believe on this board people still remain stationy, and i dont think we have as much FE as we'd like to think.