Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
Also, I just stumbled over some very solid proof of the identity of Shark_Man_Mike1. Im not going to post it because he is a 2p2er and probably doesn't want to be outed. The only thing I am going to say is that it was pretty easy to find. I just don't think it is right to out someone that made a new acct to obv hide their identity.

[/ QUOTE ]


........

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Honestly takes almost no effort to figure out. Heh, Im thinking now that it was pretty pointless to post that tho

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also, I just stumbled over some very solid proof of the identity of Shark_Man_Mike1. Im not going to post it because he is a 2p2er and probably doesn't want to be outed. The only thing I am going to say is that it was pretty easy to find. I just don't think it is right to out someone that made a new acct to obv hide their identity.

[/ QUOTE ]


........

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought this was pretty well known

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

I have only seen that name a few times before today, I had no clue who it was

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Tie seems to be up 60-80k, not sure though.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
I have only seen that name a few times before today, I had no clue who it was

[/ QUOTE ]

Just PM me who it is? Looked in the HSNL thread, apparently I'm just dumb.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Full Tilt Poker Game #4155864314: Table Boss (heads up) - $300/$600 - No Limit Hold'em - 19:46:42 ET - 2007/11/12
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 ($61,799.50)
Seat 2: tie53 ($166,343.50)
Shark_Man_Mike1 posts the small blind of $300
tie53 posts the big blind of $600
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $1,800
tie53 raises to $6,200
Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $15,000
tie53 has 15 seconds left to act
tie53 has requested TIME
tie53 raises to $25,000
Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act
Shark_Man_Mike1 has requested TIME
Shark_Man_Mike1 calls $10,000
*** FLOP *** [3h 5s 8s]
tie53 bets $21,600
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $36,799.50, and is all in
tie53 calls $15,199.50
Shark_Man_Mike1 shows [Ac Ah]
tie53 shows [Ad Kc]
*** TURN *** [3h 5s 8s] [4h]
*** RIVER *** [3h 5s 8s 4h] [Tc]
Shark_Man_Mike1 shows a pair of Aces
tie53 shows Ace King high
Shark_Man_Mike1 wins the pot ($123,598.50) with a pair of Aces
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $123,599 | Rake $0.50
Board: [3h 5s 8s 4h Tc]
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 (small blind) showed [Ac Ah] and won ($123,598.50) with a pair of Aces
Seat 2: tie53 (big blind) showed [Ad Kc] and lost with Ace King high

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
Also, I just stumbled over some very solid proof of the identity of Shark_Man_Mike1. Im not going to post it because he is a 2p2er and probably doesn't want to be outed. The only thing I am going to say is that it was pretty easy to find. I just don't think it is right to out someone that made a new acct to obv hide their identity.

[/ QUOTE ]

that should be more reason to out these multi account cheaters

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Odd bet sizing reminds me of CTS, though I doubt it's actually him - he wouldn't have a reason to not play on the MUCKEM acct.

edit: confirmed NOT to be cts

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
Honestly takes almost no effort to figure out. Heh, Im thinking now that it was pretty pointless to post that tho

[/ QUOTE ] So who the hell is it retard? Dont act like you're all high and mighty because you found something out.