$300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

After losing probably 100-200k vs p_calib4ted (peachykeen on PS), Tie has moved on to 2 tables of 300/600 vs Shark_Man_Mike1.

Anyone know anything about Mike?

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

i hear hes playing vs tie on TWO tables of 300/600 nlh

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

And yeah I can confirm that p_c4libr4ted is peachykeen on PS. He's n0rthf4ce on liquidpoker.net.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
i hear hes playing vs tie on TWO tables of 300/600 nlh

[/ QUOTE ]

... I said so in the OP

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
After losing probably 100-200k vs p_calib4ted (peachykeen on PS), Tie has moved on to 2 tables of 300/600 vs Shark_Man_Mike1.

Anyone know anything about Mike?

[/ QUOTE ]

i havent got all the hands but i have him up 46K on peachy in ~500 hands

and i have no clue who mike is hope someone does

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Oh yeah, I should mention that the 100k-200k up for peachy is what I would guess for the afternoon/evening session. peachy dropped about the same amount in the morning to Tie.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

This is a pre-emptive confirmed for the inevitable.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

I have tie stuck $725k in about 4600 hands.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
After losing probably 100-200k vs p_calib4ted (peachykeen on PS), Tie has moved on to 2 tables of 300/600 vs Shark_Man_Mike1.

Anyone know anything about Mike?

[/ QUOTE ]

i havent got all the hands but i have him up 46K on peachy in ~500 hands

and i have no clue who mike is hope someone does

[/ QUOTE ]

p_c4Libr4ted is sitting on 315k and 130k. You must have missed a few big hands or p_c4 got stuck huge in the beginning?

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

mispost

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
I have tie stuck $725k in about 4600 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

Graph pls!

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
After losing probably 100-200k vs p_calib4ted (peachykeen on PS), Tie has moved on to 2 tables of 300/600 vs Shark_Man_Mike1.

Anyone know anything about Mike?

[/ QUOTE ]

i havent got all the hands but i have him up 46K on peachy in ~500 hands

and i have no clue who mike is hope someone does

[/ QUOTE ]

p_c4Libr4ted is sitting on 315k and 130k. You must have missed a few big hands or p_c4 got stuck huge in the beginning?

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]


He had to rebuy a bunch at the start, and he dropped 150k or so in the morning in a session against Tie, so I'd guess about even for the day.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

yea peachy got stuck a lot earlier...i wouldnt be shocked if peachy is up but its nowhere near 200K

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

HH for first stack?

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Peachy confirms on liquidpoker that he's down slightly for the day

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
Peachy confirms on liquidpoker that he's down slightly for the day

[/ QUOTE ]
Holy [censored], that sucks. Link? I didn't know that they played earlier today, thought it was yesterday

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
On November 12 2007 16:23 n0rthf4ce wrote:
in the minus this time but have no fear, i will beat him eventually

[/ QUOTE ]

http://www.liquidpoker.net/informati...y_300_600.html

He's n0rthf4ce. If you create an account on LP you can click 'hands' (a link that appears beside his name in any of his forum posts), and you can click on some of the FTP ones and it'll show him as p_c4libr4ted.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Any info on sharkman?

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

ZOMG Mike is back on FTP !

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Also, I just stumbled over some very solid proof of the identity of Shark_Man_Mike1. Im not going to post it because he is a 2p2er and probably doesn't want to be outed. The only thing I am going to say is that it was pretty easy to find. I just don't think it is right to out someone that made a new acct to obv hide their identity.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
Also, I just stumbled over some very solid proof of the identity of Shark_Man_Mike1. Im not going to post it because he is a 2p2er and probably doesn't want to be outed. The only thing I am going to say is that it was pretty easy to find. I just don't think it is right to out someone that made a new acct to obv hide their identity.

[/ QUOTE ]


........

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Honestly takes almost no effort to figure out. Heh, Im thinking now that it was pretty pointless to post that tho

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Also, I just stumbled over some very solid proof of the identity of Shark_Man_Mike1. Im not going to post it because he is a 2p2er and probably doesn't want to be outed. The only thing I am going to say is that it was pretty easy to find. I just don't think it is right to out someone that made a new acct to obv hide their identity.

[/ QUOTE ]


........

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought this was pretty well known

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

I have only seen that name a few times before today, I had no clue who it was

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Tie seems to be up 60-80k, not sure though.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
I have only seen that name a few times before today, I had no clue who it was

[/ QUOTE ]

Just PM me who it is? Looked in the HSNL thread, apparently I'm just dumb.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Full Tilt Poker Game #4155864314: Table Boss (heads up) - $300/$600 - No Limit Hold'em - 19:46:42 ET - 2007/11/12
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 ($61,799.50)
Seat 2: tie53 ($166,343.50)
Shark_Man_Mike1 posts the small blind of $300
tie53 posts the big blind of $600
The button is in seat #1
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $1,800
tie53 raises to $6,200
Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $15,000
tie53 has 15 seconds left to act
tie53 has requested TIME
tie53 raises to $25,000
Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act
Shark_Man_Mike1 has requested TIME
Shark_Man_Mike1 calls $10,000
*** FLOP *** [3h 5s 8s]
tie53 bets $21,600
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $36,799.50, and is all in
tie53 calls $15,199.50
Shark_Man_Mike1 shows [Ac Ah]
tie53 shows [Ad Kc]
*** TURN *** [3h 5s 8s] [4h]
*** RIVER *** [3h 5s 8s 4h] [Tc]
Shark_Man_Mike1 shows a pair of Aces
tie53 shows Ace King high
Shark_Man_Mike1 wins the pot ($123,598.50) with a pair of Aces
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $123,599 | Rake $0.50
Board: [3h 5s 8s 4h Tc]
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 (small blind) showed [Ac Ah] and won ($123,598.50) with a pair of Aces
Seat 2: tie53 (big blind) showed [Ad Kc] and lost with Ace King high

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
Also, I just stumbled over some very solid proof of the identity of Shark_Man_Mike1. Im not going to post it because he is a 2p2er and probably doesn't want to be outed. The only thing I am going to say is that it was pretty easy to find. I just don't think it is right to out someone that made a new acct to obv hide their identity.

[/ QUOTE ]

that should be more reason to out these multi account cheaters

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Odd bet sizing reminds me of CTS, though I doubt it's actually him - he wouldn't have a reason to not play on the MUCKEM acct.

edit: confirmed NOT to be cts

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
Honestly takes almost no effort to figure out. Heh, Im thinking now that it was pretty pointless to post that tho

[/ QUOTE ] So who the hell is it retard? Dont act like you're all high and mighty because you found something out.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Honestly takes almost no effort to figure out. Heh, Im thinking now that it was pretty pointless to post that tho

[/ QUOTE ] So who the hell is it retard? Dont act like you're all high and mighty because you found something out.

[/ QUOTE ]

yea add me to the list that has had no success at all at finding out who it is

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

if you google shark_man_mike1, a hand on pokerhand.org comes up. if you click on the hand, it says posted by good2cu.

i'm assuming that's what he's referring to.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

This is such a joke, as dopamine says these highstakes players are simply creating new accounts to get action against tie. This is total [censored] imo and full tilt should do something about it. I don't have anything against the person who has created this seperate account and is playing because it's inevitable that it's going to happen but full tilt should do something about this imo.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

[ QUOTE ]
Odd bet sizing reminds me of CTS, though I doubt it's actually him - he wouldn't have a reason to not play on the MUCKEM acct.

[/ QUOTE ]

0% chance this is cole.

just saw it's g2cu. weird.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

If this is same guy that played mid high awhile back he should not be playing 3/6 even vs tie.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

i gather you can close your account down and if you wish to open one some time later you can. as long as you only have one at once>?

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Could it be one of the better SIHBs, using this acct?

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Or maybe durrrr or a friend bought a majority piece of g2cu's action. Actually it makes sense that they would outright play rather than just take the action.

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Full Tilt Poker Game #4156106565: Table Boss (heads up) - $300/$600 - No Limit Hold'em - 20:08:51 ET - 2007/11/12
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 ($158,215)
Seat 2: tie53 ($75,599.50)
tie53 posts the small blind of $300
Shark_Man_Mike1 posts the big blind of $600
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
tie53 raises to $1,800
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $6,100
tie53 calls $4,300
*** FLOP *** [2d Kd Th]
Shark_Man_Mike1 bets $8,400
tie53 calls $8,400
*** TURN *** [2d Kd Th] [As]
Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act
Shark_Man_Mike1 bets $21,600
tie53 has 15 seconds left to act
tie53 has requested TIME
tie53 calls $21,600
*** RIVER *** [2d Kd Th As] [Tc]
Shark_Man_Mike1 has 15 seconds left to act
Shark_Man_Mike1 checks
tie53 bets $39,499.50, and is all in
Shark_Man_Mike1 calls $39,499.50
*** SHOW DOWN ***
tie53 shows [Ac Td] a full house, Tens full of Aces
Shark_Man_Mike1 mucks
tie53 wins the pot ($151,198.50) with a full house, Tens full of Aces
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $151,199 | Rake $0.50
Board: [2d Kd Th As Tc]
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 (big blind) mucked
Seat 2: tie53 (small blind) collected ($151,198.50)

Re: $300/$600: Tie vs Shark_Man_Mike1
 

Full Tilt Poker Game #4156116586: Table Cairo (heads up) - $300/$600 - No Limit Hold'em - 20:09:45 ET - 2007/11/12
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 ($62,099.50)
Seat 2: tie53 ($193,417.50)
tie53 posts the small blind of $300
Shark_Man_Mike1 posts the big blind of $600
The button is in seat #2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
tie53 raises to $1,800
Shark_Man_Mike1 calls $1,200
*** FLOP *** [Js 2s 8c]
Shark_Man_Mike1 checks
tie53 bets $2,400
Shark_Man_Mike1 raises to $8,400
tie53 has 15 seconds left to act
tie53 calls $6,000
*** TURN *** [Js 2s 8c] [7s]
Shark_Man_Mike1 bets $15,600
tie53 has 15 seconds left to act
tie53 raises to $183,217.50, and is all in
Shark_Man_Mike1 calls $36,299.50, and is all in
tie53 shows [Qs 3s]
Shark_Man_Mike1 shows [Tc 9h]
Uncalled bet of $131,318 returned to tie53
*** RIVER *** [Js 2s 8c 7s] [2h]
tie53 shows a flush, Queen high
Shark_Man_Mike1 shows a straight, Jack high
tie53 wins the pot ($124,198.50) with a flush, Queen high
Shark_Man_Mike1 adds $60,000
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $124,199 | Rake $0.50
Board: [Js 2s 8c 7s 2h]
Seat 1: Shark_Man_Mike1 (big blind) showed [Tc 9h] and lost with a straight, Jack high
Seat 2: tie53 (small blind) showed [Qs 3s] and won ($124,198.50) with a flush, Queen high