Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   High Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50 (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=555411)

Jinx 11-27-2007 11:36 AM

Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
 
never played with tsarrat but doesn't your line look pretty bluffy?

DLizzle 11-27-2007 02:32 PM

Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
 
[ QUOTE ]
never played with tsarrat but doesn't your line look pretty bluffy?

[/ QUOTE ]

i don't think so unless tsarrast thinks OP will bet out into two players with air a lot on this board.

LAgambol 11-27-2007 05:37 PM

Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
 
i would call, i think your flush is good at least 40% of the time

Charlie Work 11-28-2007 01:57 AM

Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
 
It is a spot where hero's range is completely undefined, and tsarrast is going to usually have showdown value hands here that either beat a bluff or do not beat a bluff. When he raises in a spot where DJ either has a flush, fh or is bluffing (given this action and this board), a raise signifies a lot of strength.

Therefore I agree with fsu that this should be a fold, though im not nearly good enough to snap fold [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

It is important to note that we do beat 2 very reasonable combinations of flushes (7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] and 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]) which would likely play this way. However higher flushes and 88 should also be given a fair amount of weight.

Charlie Work 11-28-2007 01:58 AM

Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
 
[ QUOTE ]
never played with tsarrat but doesn't your line look pretty bluffy?

[/ QUOTE ]

This is why you should fold [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

ALL1N 11-28-2007 02:42 AM

Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
 
Those who bet the turn are we doing so purely to fold out a better flush draw? Because nothing else folds, right?

PartyGirlUK 11-28-2007 02:51 AM

Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
 
Rich, idk the guy in question but lots of pps he could have often fold to a 2nd barrel.

ALL1N 11-28-2007 08:31 AM

Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
 
Hmm. It seems to me like the best case scenario for any one pair hand which the button called the flop with: the pfr folded, and the turn came an offsuit 2. If there isn't too much history, why would we expect him to fold a pair on the turn when there aren't actually very many strong hands we're representing at all?

king_of_drafts 11-28-2007 01:36 PM

Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
 
I would fold and leave the table, thats a sick lineup even if there is a fish

TheWorstPlayer 11-28-2007 01:38 PM

Re: maybe standard laydown with a flush, 25/50
 
[ QUOTE ]
I would fold and leave the table, thats a sick lineup even if there is a fish

[/ QUOTE ]
disagree, but barely. one big fish is enough to feed a whole table. but agree that doesnt even look like a very good 100/200 table...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.