Re: Villain shoves for 2x pot but i have top pair so i call
 

[ QUOTE ]
those of you who are saying fold suck, villain was drawing to 2 outs here [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

note to party regs: do not bluff me or you will lose, k thx

[/ QUOTE ]

I like the way you played this hand and def think you took the best line. Call flop > shoving flop like someone suggested.

Re: Villain shoves for 2x pot but i have top pair so i call
 

I mean this is pretty standard against retards. Why'd you post it?

Re: Villain shoves for 2x pot but i have top pair so i call
 

[ QUOTE ]
You'll see 88/66 a fair amount here I think.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, please tell me you are joking.

Re: Villain shoves for 2x pot but i have top pair so i call
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
those of you who are saying fold suck, villain was drawing to 2 outs here [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

note to party regs: do not bluff me or you will lose, k thx

[/ QUOTE ]

so he was in fact bluffing (with a pocker pair i guess)? or did he go crazy with like QJ no diamond (which is obviously still a "bluff", basically, but some fish don't know better)

[/ QUOTE ]

He had K2o. I think we see hands like the lone Ad or 57 alot, as well as semi-bluff shoves with one pair.

But i've never ever seen someone show up with a flush or a set here. I was more worried about a panicking 2 pair that doesn't want to bet and be put to a decision if i shove, or a slowplayed overpair. AQ is def possible although other queens are too.

Re: Villain shoves for 2x pot but i have top pair so i call
 

[ QUOTE ]
I mean this is pretty standard against retards. Why'd you post it?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's pretty standard for me, i was just interested in seeing whether it was standard for 2p2 nits.

Re: Villain shoves for 2x pot but i have top pair so i call
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You'll see 88/66 a fair amount here I think.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, please tell me you are joking.

[/ QUOTE ]
Sorry, can't do that. See retards playing a set like that fairly often. When the flush come they simply have no idea what to do other than they don't wanna fold, so they push.

Re: Villain shoves for 2x pot but i have top pair so i call
 

6 combo's of 88/66, 1 million combo's of everything else fish could have. 6/1000000 is not a 'fair amount'.

Re: Villain shoves for 2x pot but i have top pair so i call
 

I did not say fold. Just that when we are behind, I expect it to be those hands mostly.

Re: Villain shoves for 2x pot but i have top pair so i call
 

When I saw the title of this thread I thought we would be in agreement. I believed it would be some wacko outright pushing the Q94 flop or something..the way this hand played out your beat pretty badly by his range (two pair,sets,a low flush that he's paranoid about getting drawn out by, AQ with the ace of diamonds).

This is a pretty quick fold.

Re: Villain shoves for 2x pot but i have top pair so i call
 

[ QUOTE ]
When I saw the title of this thread I thought we would be in agreement. I believed it would be some wacko outright pushing the Q94 flop or something..the way this hand played out your beat pretty badly by his range (two pair,sets,a low flush that he's paranoid about getting drawn out by, AQ with the ace of diamonds).

This is a pretty quick fold.

[/ QUOTE ]

qft.
just because hes a 43/10 (whatever) retard doenst justify stacking off here. u didnt provide any further read, and without that, this hand is a clear fold to me on the turn.