Are we stacking off with 3pair? PLO200
 

Im a PLO noob. So sry if this is super basic. Villain is unknown.

***** Hand History for Game 6508817712 *****
$200 USD PL Omaha - Friday, November 16, 21:02:37 ET 2007
Table Table 135449 (No DP) (Real Money)
Seat 5 is the button
Total number of players : 6
Seat 1: faxaa ( $38.61 USD )
Seat 2: too_tired1 ( $264.92 USD )
Seat 3: crazy_ant ( $396.76 USD )
Seat 4: Rapid99 ( $203.70 USD )
Seat 6: saler16 ( $148.57 USD )
Seat 5: Hero ( $207.55 USD )
saler16 posts small blind [$1 USD].
faxaa posts big blind [$2 USD].
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hero [ 7d 9s Ts Ad ]
too_tired1 folds.
crazy_ant calls [$2 USD]
Rapid99 calls [$2 USD]
>You have options at Table 135450 (No DP) Table!.
Hero raises [$11 USD]
saler16 folds.
faxaa folds.
crazy_ant folds.
Rapid99 calls [$9 USD]
** Dealing Flop ** [ 7s, Ac, Td ]
Rapid99 checks.
Hero bets [$25.65 USD]
>You have options at Table 135450 (No DP) Table!.
Rapid99 raises [$102.60 USD]
Hero?

Re: Are we stacking off with 3pair? PLO200
 

reads?
converter?

Re: Are we stacking off with 3pair? PLO200
 

[ QUOTE ]
reads?
converter?

[/ QUOTE ]

It says unknow in the OP.
Which one works for Party?

Re: Are we stacking off with 3pair? PLO200
 

looks borderline to me,

I would probably fold but the push isnt bad heads up.

he could be semibluffing with 689 or similar,
but if he is you are not really much of a fav anyway.

If he is tight its an easy pass.

Re: Are we stacking off with 3pair? PLO200
 

you have 25% equity against sets/monsterwraps here. but you'll be 62% a favourite against a range like AA**, TT**, 77**, AT**, A7**, T7**, KQJ9, 89JQ

without reads you can fold it here without sweat. but at a 6max table i think this kind sucks and i'd rather gamble it up. at best you are ahead and at worst you'll be behind and get a great table image.

Re: Are we stacking off with 3pair? PLO200
 

I'd get it in and hate it when the guy turns out to be a super-passive fish. Your backdoor draws definitely count for something too.