Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   News, Views, and Gossip (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=31)
-   -   Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=543710)

FTheFish 11-11-2007 03:55 PM

Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
 
This chat is just happened when FoxwoodsFiend was waiting at a table and gopheresque sat down. Does no one have a problem with this?

DaEvils: you want a piece?
gopheresque: sup
DaEvils: it'll be me, krantz, and whitlelime talking
together
DaEvils: playing him
gopheresque: im a wuss when it comes to thta stuff
gopheresque: hmm
DaEvils: np
DaEvils: gl @ the tables
gopheresque: lemme think
sikersorozat (Observer): gl evils
DaEvils: cool
DaEvils: later
gopheresque: i thikn
gopheresque: it is def a good bet
gopheresque: dunno if i'd do it though still
DaEvils: np, let me know
DaEvils: later


Splitting action is fine, but playing 3 on 1 is pretty unfair and morally very questionable. I thought Ariel prided himself on being ethical and holding high morals?

Enervate 11-11-2007 04:00 PM

Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
 
STFU Noob

ryanaw 11-11-2007 04:02 PM

Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
 
nothing wrong with splitting action as DaEvils prob has'nt got the roll to be playing 2 HU tables of 300/600 and maybe doesnt want to be risking alot of money playing a complete donk.

Poseidon65 11-11-2007 04:10 PM

Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
 
And if Ivey and Antonius want to come over and help out as well, I don't see a problem with it.

Stinger88 11-11-2007 04:10 PM

Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
 
I don't personally do this but it's not against the rules, part of online poker

lippy 11-11-2007 04:11 PM

Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
 
It's already been established that however many ppl can play yatta yatta, right?

FTheFish 11-11-2007 04:17 PM

Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
 
I said nowhere that this was violating any terms. I simply said that it is questionably obtaining a huge advantage, possibly crossing (not illegal) moral and ethical standards. Then I wanted to know what everyone else thought about having 3+ people playing vs a mark in a nosebleed HU game (meaning he probably has no clue this practice even takes place and therefore you can't argue "he didn't have to sit") from an ethical/moral standpoint, not a legal one.

dying2win 11-11-2007 04:24 PM

Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't personally do this but it's not against the rules, part of online poker

[/ QUOTE ]

pretty sure BT said in his latest blog that he took 1/3 or your actionin your last 300/600 game

SuperSnort 11-11-2007 04:24 PM

Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
 
[ QUOTE ]
And if Ivey and Antonius want to come over and help out as well, I don't see a problem with it.

[/ QUOTE ]
why would antonius come over? he pwns all by himself

yaaam1484 11-11-2007 04:25 PM

Re: Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't personally do this but it's not against the rules, part of online poker

[/ QUOTE ]

pretty sure BT said in his latest blog that he took 1/3 or your actionin your last 300/600 game

[/ QUOTE ]
omg is it really that hard to understand, they're talking about helping eachother playing


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.