What PTBB/100 is good?
 

Hi everyone.

What PTBB/100 is normal, good and great for 100NL? and also 200NL and 400 NL?

I am at 2,5 PTBB/100 at 100NL after 60k hands. Thinking I should aim for 5 PTBB/100 over 50k hands before moving up too 200NL. Is this too carefull?

I play 6 tables and aiming at 45-60k hands per month (right now 30k)

Sorry if this is one of those questions that is asked over and over again. Have searched but cant find any answer.

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

One million dollars.

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

[ QUOTE ]
One hundred billion dollars.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

winrate thread

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

[ QUOTE ]

Sorry if this is one of those questions that is asked over and over again. Have searched but cant find any answer.

[/ QUOTE ]

i find that hard to believe...

but yea... at 100NL i'd say 20+BB/100 can certainly be considered great

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

all of them

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

I too want a serious answer. What's reasonable at 1/2 on stars? 5ptbb/100 right?

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

jeebus....does anyone read teh FAQ?



datamine fulltilt...find out the winrates of the regs

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I too want a serious answer. What's reasonable at 1/2 on stars? 5ptbb/100 right?

[/ QUOTE ]

im going to say 4 is the upper limit for all but 2-3 of the stars regs (carrot is one, but i'm not telling who the others are [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]). 100k hands was the sample size when we all had 5+ ptbb winrates, now that most winning players are only like 2-3, who knows.

obviously here comes the graph of one of the following:
1. party winrate
2. insignificant sample size
3. unsubstantiated claim

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I too want a serious answer. What's reasonable at 1/2 on stars? 5ptbb/100 right?

[/ QUOTE ]

5ptbb/100 is reasonable on stars 1/2 for the very good regs. i think 8 is possible for the very best. this is considering at least 100k hands. any decent player can run hot for 10k-50k hands and think they are the [censored]. at any rate you should worry more about improving and moving up though.

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I too want a serious answer. What's reasonable at 1/2 on stars? 5ptbb/100 right?

[/ QUOTE ]

im going to say 4 is the upper limit for all but 2-3 of the stars regs (carrot is one, but i'm not telling who the others are [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]). 100k hands was the sample size when we all had 5+ ptbb winrates, now that most winning players are only like 2-3, who knows.

obviously here comes the graph of one of the following:
1. party winrate
2. insignificant sample size
3. unsubstantiated claim

[/ QUOTE ]

stars 200NL is beatable for 5+ for sure, but the vast majority of those who can do it are obv playing higher. the reason winrates are so low in that game is b/c

a) most regs play too many tables
b) most regs dont game select
c) most regs dont put in enough effort to improve their game because they think they are better than they are

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

eh i had a pretty large sample size of my running 6bb/100 hands at 1/2. and im sure no one will have a problem saying i have some serious leaks in my game.

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

futuredoc85: that's what i meant by what i said. of the people playing, i think 2-3 have a winrate of >4. im sure stars 200nl is beatable for 6-8 longterm, its just not worth it for the people who can. oh, and those 3 things were never a problem with party. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

luckybacon: size?

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

aim for 4+ptbb longterm before moving up

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

[ QUOTE ]
im going to say 4 is the upper limit for all but 2-3 of the stars regs

[/ QUOTE ]
KLJ,
I don't know what you consider to be an adequate sample size, but over my most recent 129,870 hands at Stars NL200 (all of which are post-legislation) my winrate at NL200 has been 3.91PTBB/100. I do tilt extensively on occasion and I still make very basic mistakes pre and postflop, especially recently in which running bad has had a negative effect on my playing ability and caused me to run at around 2PTBB/100 this month.


I'm fairly positive I'm not in the top 5 at Stars NL200 and I still have around a 4PTBB/100 over a decent sample. I would say 5.5-6 is the upper limit for most players who aren't sick good (so besides Carrot, Clayton, other really good players who could succeed higher if they didn't hate variance).

Thoughts?

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

[ QUOTE ]
the reason winrates are so low in that game is b/c

a) most regs play too many tables
b) most regs dont game select
c) most regs dont put in enough effort to improve their game because they think they are better than they are

[/ QUOTE ]
QFT especially the bold. I was playing a donk heads up with the occassional shortstack gracing us with his presence for like 45 minutes. After that table breaks and I try to find a new table, they all had like 4-5 regs on them.

Why do Stars regs love to play against each other 6 handed when the could easily play shorthanded against 1 reg and a donk?!?

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

KLJ you really think 4 is max possible? ive only beenplaying 200nl since january but im averaging 5.3ptbb over 130K hands or so. im sure somebody who signs up to the datamining service can confirm this. and i know for a FACT i have huge leaks in my game still.

thing is 130K hands is nothing. you probably need like 600K+ hands to figure out a true winrate. but i imagine people who have played that many hands have moved up.

so how are you ever gonna be sure of true winrates from datamines when nobody stays at a certain level long enough to be sure of winrates?

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

Im at 2.9ptbb/100 during my last 32k hands in june. This is when I started seriously working on my game. I 12 table though so I'm sure this is a good winrate. If i 4 tabled I'm pretty sure I could get 5+

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

[ QUOTE ]
futuredoc85: that's what i meant by what i said. of the people playing, i think 2-3 have a winrate of >4. im sure stars 200nl is beatable for 6-8 longterm, its just not worth it for the people who can. oh, and those 3 things were never a problem with party. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

luckybacon: size?

[/ QUOTE ]

eh 75k or so.

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

move up when u've got 4 grand

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

wow im such a nit then. i could never play 200nl with anything less than a 50buyin roll. thats when i moved up. anything less and id still be playin scared money. i mean even with 10k im not really THAT comfortable. 15k im very comfortable though. id probably take shots at 40buyins, 3/4 200nl 1/4 100nl when you got 50buyins, and make it your regular grind when got 75 buyins.

did i mention im a br nit?

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

[ QUOTE ]
all of them

[/ QUOTE ]
Dammit, I opened this thread just so I could say this. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

[ QUOTE ]
eh i had a pretty large sample size of my running 6bb/100 hands at 1/2. and im sure no one will have a problem saying i have some serious leaks in my game.

[/ QUOTE ]

You're pretty good.

Re: What PTBB/100 is good?
 

Can we have an official stars regulars thread again plz? I'll dig up my pt stats when I get my laptop, but I imagine some people are absolutely murdering the games right now. I also go on super monkey tilt -2,800 a couple days ago, and just got rostucko today through 10k hands. -2800 was over like 1k hands :-P I have tilt issues.

Oh and I want to marry futuredoc.