Two Plus Two Newer Archives - The Ultra-Fi thread

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)

- EDF (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=81)

- - The Ultra-Fi thread (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=556520)

The Ultra-Fi thread

Purpose of the thread
The purpose of this thread is to share information and experiences on ultra-fi systems. The essense of ultra-fi is that audio-quality is the main goal, and looks, costs, labour and so on are of lower importance. However, this does not mean that ultra-fi systems have to be ugly, expensive and labour-intensive, but it does mean that there are certain things you'll have to expect when you are looking for seriously good audio reproduction.

Not the purpose of the thread
This thread is not for discussion of home theater (televisions, projectors, surround systems, and so on); there are other threads for that.

Concepts
Room interaction and directionality
Audio means longitudinal airwaves. Unlike with headphones, speakers interact with the room and in designing a system we have to take this into account, and either try to diminish it or use it to our advantage.

Standard mistakes are: *wide-radiating tweeters in small rooms, *uneven setup and a setup that creates a lot of room interaction, *speakers who's low end measure flat in a dead room but cause insane standing waves and overall a completely unbalanced response in small to medium roomsizes.

Essential reading on room interaction (and equalizing):
http://nielsio.blogspot.com/2007/11/...akers-and.html
(posted on my blog because this text is hard to find on the net)

Coherence
The idea of an audio system is to recreate sounds. Like a piano, or a trumpet, or a voice. The frequencies that those sounds consist of are very wide. But in order to reproduce a sound and have it feel like exactly that sounds, 'right there', isn't easy. There are a lot of things you can do to mess it up. One example is breaking up the sound in many different speakers who sound different, radiate differently and then putting a big fat passive filter behind it. Our mind is able to piece the information back together to make it one sound, but it's naturality is lost, and with it a lot of detail, and it will cause listeners fatigue. This is what is called coherence. Keeping the sound natural and intact, making it blissfully easy to listen to.

One strategy of accomplishing that is by using wide-range speakers; meaning that only one speaker will produce the important frequency range, preferably unfiltered. But it's always a give and take, and you have to find a balance that fits for you.

Efficiency/power
Compare a speaker-driver with a racing car. If it's light then it can take bends more easily, and it requires less power to accomplish the same. The same philosophy applies to audio. Efficient systems are good because they can more easily give off the amplitude needed. And when a system is less stressed, the quality of sound goes up compared to a stressed system. But again, high efficiency can have its drawbacks, so again: personal preference and balance.

Less is more, but not too less
In audio systems, there is a danger of overengineering things. Wanting the system to do something perfectly according to one scale of measurements, but forgetting other aspects of sound and electro-information. In that regard, less is usually more, but the more simpler and more effective designs require higher quality components and parts. This philosophy applies to all parts: DACs, amplifiers, speakers. We can't make the systems too simple though, and almost everytime we have to make tradeoffs.

Balance
If you think about an audio-system as a whole, you want it to be in balance and overall suited/matched. When you have crappy speakers, worrying about mp3 vs flac is foolish. Buying expensive speakers but never changing your amplifier or DAC is also unsmart. And the components that you do get should be suited for each other.

System examples

BD-Design Oris

These are tractrix shaped horns with AER full-range drivers. They are insanely efficient, and because of the horns, the response balance stays good. The horns have a drop-off of around 150hz so it requires a bass-system. The bass-drivers are manufactured on BD's specifications to be suited for this system. Probably the most detailed system on the world across the whole range. Downside: not as coherent as single driver systems. Bass integration can be hard. Note: you can tune it to your needs with different drivers. I'd personally go for the lower strength magnets so that the sound is much warmer/sweeter.

http://bd-design.nl/contents/media/henry1.jpg

http://bd-design.nl/contents/media/side.jpg

http://bd-design.nl/

Open baffle

Supravox single driver or PHY-HP which has a subtle tweeter on it (simplest possible filtering). Ultra-coherent. Good radiation (directional when it needs to be). Downside: less efficient than horns. Less bass than a two-way system, but with a very large baffle and using the room to your advantage, it can be balanced. Using an equalizer is also an option, if the driver is apt for it (high linear excursion).

http://www.eliteaudio.eu/Pictures/PHY%20Fin.JPG

http://img106.imageshack.us/img106/9...nbaffleuq7.jpg

http://www.phy-hp.com/
http://www.supravox.fr/

Multiway open baffle

http://www.bastanis.com/images//bast...ometheus_l.jpg

http://www.bastanis.com/

Link with a bunch of systems (some standard, some very interesting)
http://www.arduman.com/aa/Sayfalar/friends.htm

And:
http://www.sakurasystems.com/show.html
http://bd-design.nl/contents/en-us/d1_Showroom.html

My system
Soundcard: E-MU 0404 (outputs clean spdif)
Digital equalizer: Behringer 8024.
DAC: DIY non-oversampling 1543 DAC with CS8412 spdif receiver. Can also be run through a 12v battery.
Amplifier: Joe Rasmussen's JLTi ( http://www.customanalogue.com/jlti_mark_2.htm ).
Speaker: filter-less openbaffle single-driver Supravox Signature Bicone ( http://www.supravox.fr/anglais/haut_...s/215_SBIC.htm )

How it looked in my old room:
http://my.hifi.nl/index.php?user=1088

My amplifier is currently being repaired and upgraded. I'm also going to build a new baffle for the speakers. I'm looking to move soon so I can set it all up again.

My history?
I started with a simple Sony system some 8 years ago. I soon discovered that the musical experience is enhanced with a better system. I then kept upgrading and learning about audio, and also falling in love with more and more music, and I was finally happy and ultra-satisfied with my system about two years ago. The need to improve had gone because I could listen effortless and amazed to music around the clock. No listeners fatigue, completely natural and amazing. Also I felt it was balanced really well where I would have to sacrifice some things if I wanted to gain other (like sacrificing coherence, which I simply was not willing to do). In this journey I've heard almost all types of speakers, amplifiers, and so on. From the most expensive hifi brands to the illest ultra-fi DIY stuff.

Electronics
Amplifiers
The current rage is chip amps (amplifiers that use opamps). 47 Labs came out with the Gain Card some years ago based on the LM3875, and ever since the DIY community and other amp-makers have been making great amplifiers based on opamps. Before that, it was pretty well established that single ended tube-amps where the greatest (at least for mid to high efficienct speakers). I've personally heard one of the best chip amps on an Oris system, compared it to a 300B tube amp, and my conclusion was that they were in the same category of quality but that they had a slightly different 'colour'.

Ofcourse there are a bunch of different amplifier designs, but they have a hard time keeping up in terms of directness, detail, naturality, etc.

Chip amps
http://www.sakurasystems.com/graphics/prgaincard.jpg

http://www.sakurasystems.com/products/47amp.html

http://www.sakurasystems.com/graphics/pr4717ok.jpg

http://www.sakurasystems.com/products/shigaamp.html

Single ended tube amps
http://www.zenit-hi-fi.ru/lineikapic/433.gif

http://www.ukd.co.uk/product.asp?ProductID=113

http://www.affordablevalvecompany.com/300pse_m.jpg
Some single ended 300B amplifier

DACs
47 Labs also introduced a 'less is more' DA convertor: non-oversampling 1543. It was a hit also and there exist a bunch of DIY and commercial variants today.
http://www.scott-nixon.com/smallufotubebackblack.jpg

http://www.scott-nixon.com/dac.htm

http://www.sakurasystems.com/graphics/4715back.jpg

http://www.sakurasystems.com/products/shigadac.html

There are also kits for the 1541 DAC I've heard. Don't know of any commercial variant of those yet.

Epilogue
Pokerplayers often have money for nice things. I know many people love music, but you can go really far in this enjoyment if you learn about and invest in a good audio-system. Maybe I can help you out in this a little. Feel free to ask anything you'd like.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

How do you get started on the path? Like let's say I just bought some 2K-5K nice home theatre type of setup. What would you have me listen to or whatever if you wanted to convince me that I should upgrade my setup in some way? Like is there a specific CD or something where you'll say "See, on my system I get these lows and on your system you don't?" Or you talk about listening fatigue - what should I do if I want to experience that on my own system? I'm looking for a way to experience the difference between 'hi-fi' and 'ultra-fi' I guess.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

"These go to eleven"

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
How do you get started on the path? Like let's say I just bought some 2K-5K nice home theatre type of setup. What would you have me listen to or whatever if you wanted to convince me that I should upgrade my setup in some way? Like is there a specific CD or something where you'll say "See, on my system I get these lows and on your system you don't?" Or you talk about listening fatigue - what should I do if I want to experience that on my own system? I'm looking for a way to experience the difference between 'hi-fi' and 'ultra-fi' I guess.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hi TWP,

You know an audio-system is good, when you find yourself sitting in front of it and just listening to the music. The music will pull you in and you will be fully intrigued by what you're hearing. Like going to a concert or other live performance. You will feel *there*.

And ofcourse, such a system translates into details you've never heard before, but not just that, the quality of the entire sound goes up enormously. You will start to hear it, like it's on the recording, and not some muffled, compressed, distorted, unpleasant version of it. A string becomes a string, a voice becomes a voice and a drum becomes a drum. And that is bloody wicked!

So you'll want to hear such a system and find out what that's like. You could try to find an Oris owner in your neighbourhood. You could also go to a hifi store, and ask them to put a Beyerdynamic 880 or 990 pro in their best cd-player/DAC/headphone-amp combo. Bring a bunch of your own CDs of all different kinds (also bring classical music with good voices and all that). These headphones sound very similar to these systems. They are actually miniature versions of the same concepts. They're high efficient, single driver, open baffle systems, with an emphasis on little room interaction. You should be able to hear insane differences compared to a standard system. You'll also hear that some of your music is actually quite crappy in it's recording quality and others are amazing.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How do you get started on the path? Like let's say I just bought some 2K-5K nice home theatre type of setup. What would you have me listen to or whatever if you wanted to convince me that I should upgrade my setup in some way? Like is there a specific CD or something where you'll say "See, on my system I get these lows and on your system you don't?" Or you talk about listening fatigue - what should I do if I want to experience that on my own system? I'm looking for a way to experience the difference between 'hi-fi' and 'ultra-fi' I guess.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hi TWP,

You know an audio-system is good, when you find yourself sitting in front of it and just listening to the music. The music will pull you in and you will be fully intrigued by what you're hearing. Like going to a concert or other live performance. You will feel *there*.

And ofcourse, such a system translates into details you've never heard before, but not just that, the quality of the entire sound goes up enormously. You will start to hear it, like it's on the recording, and not some muffled, compressed, distorted, unpleasant version of it. A string becomes a string, a voice becomes a voice and a drum becomes a drum. And that is bloody wicked!

So you'll want to hear such a system and find out what that's like. You could try to find an Oris owner in your neighbourhood. You could also go to a hifi store, and ask them to put a Beyerdynamic 880 or 990 pro in their best cd-player/DAC/headphone-amp combo. Bring a bunch of your own CDs of all different kinds (also bring classical music with good voices and all that). These headphones sound very similar to these systems. They are actually miniature versions of the same concepts. They're high efficient, single driver, open baffle systems, with an emphasis on little room interaction. You should be able to hear insane differences compared to a standard system. You'll also hear that some of your music is actually quite crappy in it's recording quality and others are amazing.

[/ QUOTE ]

The one thing that the high-end headphone rig won't get you is great imaging and a huge soundstage, which (imo) is one of the best things about great stereo (and i guess home theater) systems.

Everything else, though ... yeah.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
The one thing that the high-end headphone rig won't get you is great imaging and a huge soundstage, which (imo) is one of the best things about great stereo (and i guess home theater) systems.

Everything else, though ... yeah.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah. I almost commented on the differences between headphones and a normal setup, and it's just like you said: the soundstage is spread out over a large area, towards one side, creating an actual 'stage'. That way, the instruments will sound proportional to their real size.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

Nielsio - I'm curious why you don't have a direct IS2 USB dac instead of the Spdif connection. Aren't they supposed to be way better on the jitter front? Examples are like the one you showed (That Scott Nixon) and of course the Gordon Rankin Wavelength models.
I'm convinced a good lossless, PC audio based system is the way of the future. No more spinning discs.

I'm still regretting my sale of my JM Lab Daline speakers.
I miss having a great system, but for now a good headphone based system will have to do. May get that Scott Nixon Dac to tide me over.
I really, really, really want those MBL's though.

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b277/cwsiggy/mbls.jpg

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
Nielsio - I'm curious why you don't have a direct IS2 USB dac instead of the Spdif connection.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm glad you asked, I was too embarrassed. Aloysius and I were discussing this, but he thought it was a dumb thing to even consider

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
Nielsio - I'm curious why you don't have a direct IS2 USB dac instead of the Spdif connection. Aren't they supposed to be way better on the jitter front? Examples are like the one you showed (That Scott Nixon) and of course the Gordon Rankin Wavelength models.

[/ QUOTE ]

My DAC is a little older than the USB variants. Bert Doppenberg was one of the first with a USB DAC, the TwinDAC+ ( http://bd-design.nl/contents/en-us/d37.html ). I heard it and it sounded good (obviously). It seems a good and easy solution (requires no soundcard anymore). However in my case I can't really use it. My (digital) equalizer sits between the computer output and the DAC. It's a vital part of the system. You could fit the DAC with a reclock, but I find battery powering it makes it really stellar all around anyway.

[ QUOTE ]
I'm convinced a good lossless, PC audio based system is the way of the future. No more spinning discs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Clearly.

[ QUOTE ]
I'm still regretting my sale of my JM Lab Daline speakers.

[/ QUOTE ]

You can always get/make something better [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[ QUOTE ]
I miss having a great system, but for now a good headphone based system will have to do. May get that Scott Nixon Dac to tide me over.

I really, really, really want those MBL's though.

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b277/cwsiggy/mbls.jpg

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't know this speaker, except for seeing it on pictures somewhere sometime. I checked it out now to understand what the hell it is.

It's 4-way. It crosses at 105, 600 and 3500 hz. Sounds like Piega, probably. It's sick expensive. I don't get why it's omnidirectional. They don't have to be (see Piega), and it certainly doesn't add anything besides problems. It requires a shitton of filtering, and an insane amount of amp-juice. I imagine this speaker sounding dull (like Piega). I have heard some good Magnepans (the huge kind) in the past though (not entirely sure how I'd judge them now); which seems like a better/simpler choice.

When you have a such a multi-way, low efficient system, it might sound pleasant/clean because of the electrocoils (or how do you call that), but it loses it's bite/slam; the uberdirectness you need to make it sound real.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

A purely ported sub-100hz bass seems lol btw. That's gonna sound entirely muddy and slow.

No, I think these guys are more in it for the bling than real audio quality.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
No, I think these guys are more in it for the bling than real audio quality.

[/ QUOTE ]

But if you feel otherwise, please share.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
Nielsio - I'm curious why you don't have a direct IS2 USB dac instead of the Spdif connection.

[/ QUOTE ]

My DAC has limited functionality when used with USB as opposed to spdif I was told. I never have a/b'd though.

[ QUOTE ]
I'm convinced a good lossless, PC audio based system is the way of the future. No more spinning discs.

[/ QUOTE ]

except the hard drive [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

OP and several others in this thread, I used to work for a high-end audio store. You are what the salesman would have called "bread-and-butter". You would have been mentioned at Thanksgiving when it was time to say what you were thankful for.

That said, things have come a long freaking way in 10 years. I started to become a tiny bit of an car-audiophile, so I get the concept. But I just feel like you're always chasing the buzz of that first upgrade to a high-class system, when all your music sounds new again. It seems like every upgrade after that is diminishing returns.

But I dunno, I'm not sure I've heard a system as well laid out as the one you describe. Do you still feel like all your music is new when you make some big coherence breakthrough or something?

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

all,

Red Wine Audio has some of the coolest products (battery powered integrated and mono amps and modded battery powered Olive music servers. Vinni Rossi also has an all battery powered USB DAC/ Pre amp in the works - called Isabella - from his website....

"The Isabella will be an SLA battery powered tubed preamp, with built-in NOS dac (non-oversampling...not to be confused with "new old stock" in this context Mr. Green) . Details are still being worked out and please keep in mind that nothing is set in stone at this point, but here are some of the features:

-- Tubed-preamp stage using two 6922 (6DJ8/ECC88) tubes...one per channel. Other tubes in this family can be used, such as the 7308, 6H23 (russian), 6N11 (chinese)

-- The Isabella will be completely off-the-grid running on SLA battery power, and will feature the new SMART module as described here:
http://www.audiocircle.com/circles/i...?topic=44739.0
It will also feature the same new style 24V SLA battery charger as the Siganture 30.2 and 70.2 (with 4x faster charging speed and beefy XLR plug), and touch-sensing power switch built into the front panel.

-- The gain will probably in the neighborhood of 12dB

-- There will be a built-in non-oversampling dac that is going to change your opinion of "digital music" in that it is not going to sound anything like digital. With a USB input (direct to I2S), using a computer as your source is going to blow your mind. Singing Happily For those who prefer to use a CD player, DVD player, SB2, SB3, Olive Music Server (hopefully modded on SLA ), or any other source that outputs SPDIF, the Isabella's internal dac will also accept coax or optical spdif inputs."

www.redwineaudio.com

Suzzer99 - You are of course correct about diminishing returns - lets face it - the main difference in a 20k speaker and a good 5k one is mostly bass. I think you probably don't need to spend much more than say 6k total. Anything more is serious diminishing returns, but for a Goldman Sachs subprime shortseller, why not...

These new digital products are very exciting in that for relatively low money - one gets the best of both worlds; world beating sound that competes with expensive transports and cd palyers and the advantages of digital playback such as unlimited access to entire library on the fly.
I will never, ever, ever, ever purchase a cd player again.
Most people have of couese already figured this out, but for the wrong reasons (mp3)

I need more $ [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
OP and several others in this thread, I used to work for a high-end audio store. You are what the salesman would have called "bread-and-butter". You would have been mentioned at Thanksgiving when it was time to say what you were thankful for.

That said, things have come a long freaking way in 10 years. I started to become a tiny bit of an car-audiophile, so I get the concept. But I just feel like you're always chasing the buzz of that first upgrade to a high-class system, when all your music sounds new again. It seems like every upgrade after that is diminishing returns.

But I dunno, I'm not sure I've heard a system as well laid out as the one you describe. Do you still feel like all your music is new when you make some big coherence breakthrough or something?

[/ QUOTE ]

The problem you describe is what happens when you don't think about and experiment with system design; if your system doesn't improve on a conceptual level, then you're never going to be really happy with the results.

This is actually one of the things that the hifi market taylors to: the designs stay the same fundamentally and people are stuck upgrading forever in miniscule ways.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
Suzzer99 - You are of course correct about diminishing returns - lets face it - the main difference in a 20k speaker and a good 5k one is mostly bass.

[/ QUOTE ]

wat?

[ QUOTE ]
I think you probably don't need to spend much more than say 6k total.

[/ QUOTE ]

wat?

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

As you get into hi-fi, you realize what really is important and what isn't. Some spend unreal sums on "extreme point of diminishing returns" or even pure snake oil, such as $3,000 power cords, Shakti stones, green magic markers for CD edges, and such. But then they set up their $50,000 system in some crappy audio space and with components that don't complement each other.

The attributes of the room your stereo goes in is huge. And it might not cost anything at all. Simply by moving your stereo from one room to another could result in huge improvements. Most people don't realize that you don't listen to your stereo, you listen to sound waves. And the physical properties of the room your stereo is in has a huge effect on the sound waves that reach your ears.

Another example would be turntable setup. You can buy a $2,000 cartridge, but if the thing isn't aligned and installed optimally, the sound might suck. Again, that is free. You could very easily get better sound from a $200 cartridge than a $3,000 one, and never have a clue why.

When people start thinking in terms of physics rather than magic, they'll do better.

Personally, I'm convinced that satellite/sub combos have a better chance at providing the best bass response. You open up new problems like introduction of new crossovers, cables and amps. But being able to have flexibility in the location and settings for just the deep woofer is a big advantage for most setups.

Another problem some people have is only understanding part of the picture. Different technologies usually have different strengths and weaknesses. If you simply buy a particular component because "it's the best", it might be the exact opposite of what your system really needs. Also, just because some audio magazine or some audio snob says such-and-such is very important, it might not be important to you. You have to listen to music and decide what's really important to you. You don't want a tube amp if the strengths and weaknesses don't fit your personal preferences.

Having said that, the customer (you, in this case) is not always right. That is, just because you think you like your sound a certain way, you might think that out of ignorance. If you don't like much low bass response, then it's not worth paying for it. However if you think you don't like low bass response as a knee-jerk reaction to the goofball with the jacked up car playing rap music way too loud at your local stoplight, then you are doing yourself a disservice by not going out to a quality hi-fi store and listening to what true lifelike low bass extension really is.

You might find that midrange timbre and lack of treble grain is so important to you that you can live without deep bass if that's what you have to give up. Then you might live with a very low power tube amp. On the other hand the reverse might be true. If you find the bottom octave of music is important to giving you a lifelike presentation (or even an artificial presentation that you simply enjoy more), then you might go with some different setup.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
all,

Red Wine Audio has some of the coolest ..

[/ QUOTE ]

Hadn't heard of that one before. Yeah, their products seem hot. Same type of stuff as BD Design has in terms of electronics, today. It's all pretty similar to the stuff I already have, but if you're new to this you now have a bunch of competing options for a reasonable price.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Suzzer99 - You are of course correct about diminishing returns - lets face it - the main difference in a 20k speaker and a good 5k one is mostly bass.

[/ QUOTE ]

wat?

[ QUOTE ]
I think you probably don't need to spend much more than say 6k total.

[/ QUOTE ]

wat?

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh come on - I'm talking in generalities, but correct me if I'm wrong, but even a very, very good salesman at a great NJ high end store basically said the same thing regarding bass. That's what costs, cause to get great bass, you have to spend for the cabinetry(among other things). My tweeter on my Dalines were more or less the same as on the 80k Wilson's, my bass obviously was not. (bit of an exageration but again, I'm talking in big generalities.) Look at most high end monitors - they are the full range speaker minus the better bass. Micro Utopia - basically a Utopia minus better bass. B&W 805's? 801's minus the bass. get it??
I'm sure there are more complex issues involving crossovers at the midranges on better speakers but....

and anything over 6k ish is serious diminishing returns. ok - bump it to 10k

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Suzzer99 - You are of course correct about diminishing returns - lets face it - the main difference in a 20k speaker and a good 5k one is mostly bass.

[/ QUOTE ]

wat?

[ QUOTE ]
I think you probably don't need to spend much more than say 6k total.

[/ QUOTE ]

wat?

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh come on - I'm talking in generalities, but correct me if I'm wrong, but even a very, very good salesman at a great NJ high end store basically said the same thing regarding bass.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol?

[ QUOTE ]
That's what costs, cause to get great bass, you have to spend for the cabinetry(among other things).

[/ QUOTE ]

? Wood is pretty cheap imo

[ QUOTE ]
My tweeter on my Dalines were more or less the same as on the 80k Wilson's, my bass obviously was not. (bit of an exageration but again, I'm talking in big generalities.) Look at most high end monitors - they are the full range speaker minus the better bass. Micro Utopia - basically a Utopia minus better bass. B&W 805's? 801's minus the bass. get it??

[/ QUOTE ]

Notice how none of the above systems have that tweeter and that all of the above systems have an entirely different speaker design from the big brand stuff you mention.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

I'll put in my plug for Vandersteen speakers. I have the 2Ce, which is very highly regarded in the audiophile circle as one of the least expensive, full range, high end speaker systems. They were ~$1300/pair when I bought them 10 years ago and about $2000 now.

Their highest end model is the Model 5 for about $17k.

When I was shopping for them, my buddy was seriously pushing for me to get the Thiel CS3.6, but I couldn't justify spending more than twice as much for speakers.

Both Vandersteen and Thiel are highly regarded by The Audio Perfectionist, because they follow the same principle of phase and time-coherent drivers.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

We sold a lot of Vandersteens where I worked.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

Vandy 2CE Sig is probably one of the best buys in high end audio. My buddy has a pair - they are sweet sounding.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
I'll put in my plug for Vandersteen speakers. I have the 2Ce, which is very highly regarded in the audiophile circle as one of the least expensive, full range, high end speaker systems. They were ~$1300/pair when I bought them 10 years ago and about $2000 now.

Their highest end model is the Model 5 for about $17k.

When I was shopping for them, my buddy was seriously pushing for me to get the Thiel CS3.6, but I couldn't justify spending more than twice as much for speakers.

Both Vandersteen and Thiel are highly regarded by The Audio Perfectionist, because they follow the same principle of phase and time-coherent drivers.

[/ QUOTE ]

Low efficient, multi-multi-way speakers. Pretty yawn imo.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
Vandy 2CE Sig is probably one of the best buys in high end audio.

[/ QUOTE ]

No.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Vandy 2CE Sig is probably one of the best buys in high end audio.

[/ QUOTE ]

No.

[/ QUOTE ]

now you are just plain wrong - every Hi Fi reviewer / writer would agree to that. The Vandy's are the equivalent of the Dark Side of the Moon album - beyond a classic.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

I feel like these responses are a little too "hey have you guys heard of this brand? yeah me too!" whereas neils intended to talk more about design and sound. Brand homerism is kinda meh(although i must admit im an ultra homer wrt headphones).

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Vandy 2CE Sig is probably one of the best buys in high end audio.

[/ QUOTE ]

No.

[/ QUOTE ]

now you are just plain wrong - every Hi Fi reviewer / writer would agree to that. The Vandy's are the equivalent of the Dark Side of the Moon album - beyond a classic.

[/ QUOTE ]

If it's in a sponsored magazine then it must be true.

Did you read the OP? Are you even thinking about design?

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Vandy 2CE Sig is probably one of the best buys in high end audio.

[/ QUOTE ]

No.

[/ QUOTE ]

now you are just plain wrong - every Hi Fi reviewer / writer would agree to that. The Vandy's are the equivalent of the Dark Side of the Moon album - beyond a classic.

[/ QUOTE ]

well imo dark side of the moon isnt pink floyds best record so your example is poor.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
Did you read the OP? Are you even thinking about design?

[/ QUOTE ]
The design of the Vandersteen (and Thiel and Dunlavy) speakers is multiple phase-coherent drivers mounted in a time coherent manner (such that the sound from each driver arrives at approximately the same time), using relatively simple crossover systems, mounted on relatively small baffles (except the Dunlavy).

Obviously not your cup of tea, but a nice, simple design nonetheless.

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

I just picked up a pair of these Spharons, they're ok, but I need to buy a new house now.

http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/...speaker_58.jpg

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
I just picked up a pair of these Spharons, they're ok, but I need to buy a new house now.

http://gizmodo.com/assets/resources/...speaker_58.jpg

[/ QUOTE ]

What kind of drivers do they carry? Compression?

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Did you read the OP? Are you even thinking about design?

[/ QUOTE ]
The design of the Vandersteen (and Thiel and Dunlavy) speakers is multiple phase-coherent drivers mounted in a time coherent manner (such that the sound from each driver arrives at approximately the same time), using relatively simple crossover systems, mounted on relatively small baffles (except the Dunlavy).

Obviously not your cup of tea, but a nice, simple design nonetheless.

[/ QUOTE ]

Have you ever heard a real time and phase coherent speaker (single driver or widerange speaker)?

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Did you read the OP? Are you even thinking about design?

[/ QUOTE ]
The design of the Vandersteen (and Thiel and Dunlavy) speakers is multiple phase-coherent drivers mounted in a time coherent manner (such that the sound from each driver arrives at approximately the same time), using relatively simple crossover systems, mounted on relatively small baffles (except the Dunlavy).

Obviously not your cup of tea, but a nice, simple design nonetheless.

[/ QUOTE ]

Have you ever heard a real time and phase coherent speaker (single driver or widerange speaker)?

[/ QUOTE ]

If you're implying that Thiel and Vandersteen are not time and phase coherent, then the answer is no (unless electrostatics count. I heard a full-range electrostatic once (forgot the brand name, though). Great with orchestral music. But I wasn't impressed with it's performance with rock music. Plus it was about $8k/pair).

I'm simply not as into "high-end" stereo as I was when I was single. Any other manufacturers you'd recommend (besides the one in the first post)?

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

I have PMC FB1+ speaker, and Cyrus MonoX Power and PreAmp. They sound great, and love them to bits!

http://www.avreview.co.uk/news/image...b1_180x310.jpg
http://www.fl-electronic.de/neuklang..._arbourtop.jpg

The speaker came in at £1,200 ($2,500) and the amps where about £2,500 for the pair ($5,000)

The soundstage is amazing, im sure some of you have a lot nice systems but this setup is great. The HD650's ive got sound ace as well [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

I used to know a guy from back when I was going to Phish shows who was an audio engineer and showed me this website along time ago and was going to build the imperial folded horn cabinet. I lost touch with him and never heard if he got it done or how it sounded. THe claims on the imperial page sound untrue but he did not seem to think so and said it is all in the design and how the sound is moved in the cabinet. He worked for McIntosh doing something, I cannot recall what though. He knew his stuff at least with respect to mastering phish shows so much that the band own archivist was giving him previously untouched DATS from the early 90s to master for release on bt.etree.org (legal tracker). What is those of you who know your stuff take on Decware's stuff and have anyone purchased anything from them. You can even buy the plans for the cabinets which I think is pretty cool.

http://www.decware.com/newsite/mainmenu.htm

He was looking at this design.
http://www.decware.com/newsite/mainm....htm&intro

"On one occasion a club owner wanted to hear what one would do in his own place so he called us up. On the spur of the moment we had to take what we had so we packed up a single Imperial, my frequency generator, and an old Harmon Kardon Reciever with one channel blown. Just before we got this call, we had been experiementing with a unique driver arangement. We removed the 15 inch woofer, and replaced it with a 12 inch woofer that was already mounted in a 1 cubic foot sealed cube. The response of the woofer in the cube was 3 dB down at 120 cycles. Basically ZERO bass. We installed this cube into the Imperial with the woofer facing the back of the encosure. The original 15 inch speaker opening was sealed. Installed the response was a bit different. Starting at the same 120 cycles and measuring the SPL at 90 dB in the room we slowly started to sweep the frequencies down until at 28.5 cycles the SPL had risen to 118 dB. That's a 28 dB of gain at 28.5 cycles! I really can't begin to describe what happens at that frequency when you hit that SPL, but it's serious. We saw a mouse stagger out of a crack in the concrete floor and die."

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

one thing I was surprised with in my research for my first midlevel system was that while there were plenty of people calling out the myriad snake oil sellers and addicts, I didn't ever find source publication based on double blind testing. is there no such thing? and really not enough of a market for it? (Dunlavy's testing against live performance seemed to me like the most awesome thing of anything I read).

Re: The Ultra-Fi thread

Pretty much everything even loosely related to the "audiophile" market is a scam, whenever anyone does a double blind test the audiophiles freak out(because they've just spent $400 on a volume knob and admitting they got took is too great a blow to the ego) and claim the test was invalid.