New Rudy G. interview
 

New LiveLeak interview if any of you care..

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=416_1194979418

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

lol, Rudy says that disagreeing with Barack on the subject of Iran is one of the only things they agree with each other.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

Hearing comprehension problem? He said Baracks naivete is one of the only things that Hillary and he agree on.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
Hearing comprehension problem? He said Baracks naivete is one of the only things that Hillary and he agree on.

[/ QUOTE ]
Mostly a writing problem. That's what I meant to write. It's comical, very politically superficial, and perhaps intellectually dishonest that he would say that's the only thing they agree one.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hearing comprehension problem? He said Baracks naivete is one of the only things that Hillary and he agree on.

[/ QUOTE ]
Mostly a writing problem. That's what I meant to write. It's comical, very politically superficial, and perhaps intellectually dishonest that he would say that's the only thing they agree one.

[/ QUOTE ]

comical and superficial maybe, but not ID...I cant think of a single important issue that they are even close on..to the extent you can pin Shrillary down to a single position, that is.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

At the end he talks about a practical approach to strengthening the dollar...agency by agency cuts of 5-10%/year, and eliminating half the jobs that open up due to retirements. For someone with a non-corporate background its unusual to hear such a specific and workable idea.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hearing comprehension problem? He said Baracks naivete is one of the only things that Hillary and he agree on.

[/ QUOTE ]
Mostly a writing problem. That's what I meant to write. It's comical, very politically superficial, and perhaps intellectually dishonest that he would say that's the only thing they agree one.

[/ QUOTE ]

comical and superficial maybe, but not ID...I cant think of a single important issue that they are even close on..to the extent you can pin Shrillary down to a single position, that is.

[/ QUOTE ]
I guess it all depends on perspective. From my point of view as is concerns the war in Iraq/Iran ect. they are the same. They have some differs views here and there, but they don't mean much to me.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hearing comprehension problem? He said Baracks naivete is one of the only things that Hillary and he agree on.

[/ QUOTE ]
Mostly a writing problem. That's what I meant to write. It's comical, very politically superficial, and perhaps intellectually dishonest that he would say that's the only thing they agree one.

[/ QUOTE ]

comical and superficial maybe, but not ID...I cant think of a single important issue that they are even close on..to the extent you can pin Shrillary down to a single position, that is.

[/ QUOTE ]
I guess it all depends on perspective. From my point of view as is concerns the war in Iraq/Iran ect. they are the same. They have some differs views here and there, but they don't mean much to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you can find a consistent position she has on Iraq/Iran you'd be the first.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

Copernicus,

I'm just curious. Which Republican are you voting for?

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
Copernicus,

I'm just curious. Which Republican are you voting for?

[/ QUOTE ]

RG. I slightly prefer MR, primarily because of his stronger immigration stance, but I dont think MR is electable as Pres. An RG/MR ticket would have a realistic shot against Shrillary, because the 40+% that would never vote for a her wouldnt be offset by the similar numbers who wouldnt vote for a Mormon.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

I think you're not giving enough weight to the fact that Mitt Romney is good looking.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
I think you're not giving enough weight to the fact that Mitt Romney is good looking.

[/ QUOTE ]

I did consider the JFK effect, but don't think it works nearly as well for a Mormon than a Catholic.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
Copernicus,

I'm just curious. Which Republican are you voting for?

[/ QUOTE ]

You should be asking: Which big-government Republican with few if any discernible conservative ideals are you going to vote for?

natedogg

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
Hearing comprehension problem? He said Baracks naivete is one of the only things that Hillary and he agree on.

[/ QUOTE ]

So Giuliani wants to eliminate the IRS? NICE!

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hearing comprehension problem? He said Baracks naivete is one of the only things that Hillary and he agree on.

[/ QUOTE ]

So Giuliani wants to eliminate the IRS? NICE!

[/ QUOTE ]

You took the wrong end of that proposition. Giuliani doesnt want to use the IRS to harass the enemies of the Clinton machine.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Copernicus,

I'm just curious. Which Republican are you voting for?

[/ QUOTE ]

You should be asking: Which big-government Republican with few if any discernible conservative ideals are you going to vote for?

natedogg

[/ QUOTE ]

I was trying to avoid redundancy.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

Approximatively at what point in the video does of he speak about strengthening the dollar? I'm interested to hear but don't want to watch the whole thing?

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

Dollar talk is at the 13 minute mark.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

You could listen to it on rewind and it would probably have about the same content. I wouldn't quibble over minute marks.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Hearing comprehension problem? He said Baracks naivete is one of the only things that Hillary and he agree on.

[/ QUOTE ]
Mostly a writing problem. That's what I meant to write. It's comical, very politically superficial, and perhaps intellectually dishonest that he would say that's the only thing they agree one.

[/ QUOTE ]

comical and superficial maybe, but not ID...I cant think of a single important issue that they are even close on..to the extent you can pin Shrillary down to a single position, that is.

[/ QUOTE ]
I guess it all depends on perspective. From my point of view as is concerns the war in Iraq/Iran ect. they are the same. They have some differs views here and there, but they don't mean much to me.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you can find a consistent position she has on Iraq/Iran you'd be the first.

[/ QUOTE ]
She wants to stay for a long time he wants to stay for a long time. The only difference is that Rudy has the luxury of being able to talk about staying there while Hildog has to lie and be vague to get by the silly nomination process.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

Another interesting Rudy tid bit that we will surely hear more about $100 million law suits tend to make folks talk...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...072regan1.html

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

Another link to a story...

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/13/nyregi...amp;oref=slogin

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
Another interesting Rudy tid bit that we will surely hear more about $100 million law suits tend to make folks talk...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...072regan1.html

[/ QUOTE ]
This makes my soul smile.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
Another interesting Rudy tid bit that we will surely hear more about $100 million law suits tend to make folks talk...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...072regan1.html

[/ QUOTE ]

A Judith Reagan lawsuit? I doubt that anyone will give that publicity whore the time of day, unless they subscribe to some Rupert Murdoch/Fox conspiracy idiocy.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Another interesting Rudy tid bit that we will surely hear more about $100 million law suits tend to make folks talk...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...072regan1.html

[/ QUOTE ]

A Judith Reagan lawsuit? I doubt that anyone will give that publicity whore the time of day, unless they subscribe to some Rupert Murdoch/Fox conspiracy idiocy.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I don't see any reason for CNN or MSNBC to use this to make them look like they are the better news station. I am sure they will just leave it alone and let Fox handle their business privately... [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Another interesting Rudy tid bit that we will surely hear more about $100 million law suits tend to make folks talk...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...072regan1.html

[/ QUOTE ]
This makes my soul smile.

[/ QUOTE ]

This makes me stop and think about how insane everybody is.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Another interesting Rudy tid bit that we will surely hear more about $100 million law suits tend to make folks talk...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...072regan1.html

[/ QUOTE ]

A Judith Reagan lawsuit? I doubt that anyone will give that publicity whore the time of day, unless they subscribe to some Rupert Murdoch/Fox conspiracy idiocy.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I don't see any reason for CNN or MSNBC to use this to make them look like they are the better news station. I am sure they will just leave it alone and let Fox handle their business privately... [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

No reason to be confused..Im sure CNN and MSNBC will generate a lot of noise about it (note my caveat about Rupert/Fox conspiracies). All 18 CNN and MSNBC viewers will get bombarded with it. BFD.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
All 18 CNN and MSNBC viewers will get bombarded with it. BFD.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ummm... wtf?

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
All 18 CNN and MSNBC viewers will get bombarded with it. BFD.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ummm... wtf?

[/ QUOTE ]

you have a problem with hyperbole? on this board? let me spell it out for you. Amongst voting age viewers

FNC>MSNBC+CNBC+CNN

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

Most people I know watch CNN only, as do I... mostly because Fox doesn't even try to hide their bias.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
Most people I know watch CNN only, as do I... mostly because Fox doesn't even try to hide their bias.

[/ QUOTE ]

And CNN tries to but does a lousy job of it, though not as badly as MSNBC. Cable news is largely irrelevant anyway. The offsetting viewership couldnt swing an election if it was all concentrated in Ohio or Florida. If there is any media impact it would be from talk radio, and JR isnt going to get any play there.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Another interesting Rudy tid bit that we will surely hear more about $100 million law suits tend to make folks talk...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...072regan1.html

[/ QUOTE ]

A Judith Reagan lawsuit? I doubt that anyone will give that publicity whore the time of day, unless they subscribe to some Rupert Murdoch/Fox conspiracy idiocy.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I don't see any reason for CNN or MSNBC to use this to make them look like they are the better news station. I am sure they will just leave it alone and let Fox handle their business privately... [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

No reason to be confused..Im sure CNN and MSNBC will generate a lot of noise about it (note my caveat about Rupert/Fox conspiracies). All 18 CNN and MSNBC viewers will get bombarded with it. BFD.

[/ QUOTE ]

Copernicus is dead on.... I just saw this story on CNN.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

Giuliani is such a crappy candidate. Contrary to what most people think, New Yorkers despise him. All the police shootings and beatings he defended, the way he divorced his wife on TV, (and then divorced the woman he left for a couple years later in a really ugly way), it has all added up. That is why you see things like this: Police Union Won't Support Giuliani

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Another interesting Rudy tid bit that we will surely hear more about $100 million law suits tend to make folks talk...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...072regan1.html

[/ QUOTE ]

A Judith Reagan lawsuit? I doubt that anyone will give that publicity whore the time of day, unless they subscribe to some Rupert Murdoch/Fox conspiracy idiocy.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I don't see any reason for CNN or MSNBC to use this to make them look like they are the better news station. I am sure they will just leave it alone and let Fox handle their business privately... [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

No reason to be confused..Im sure CNN and MSNBC will generate a lot of noise about it (note my caveat about Rupert/Fox conspiracies). All 18 CNN and MSNBC viewers will get bombarded with it. BFD.

[/ QUOTE ]

Copernicus is dead on.... I just saw this story on CNN.

[/ QUOTE ]
By dead on you mean he originally stated that no one would pick up this story...then yeah you're right he was dead on.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Another interesting Rudy tid bit that we will surely hear more about $100 million law suits tend to make folks talk...

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive...072regan1.html

[/ QUOTE ]

A Judith Reagan lawsuit? I doubt that anyone will give that publicity whore the time of day, unless they subscribe to some Rupert Murdoch/Fox conspiracy idiocy.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I don't see any reason for CNN or MSNBC to use this to make them look like they are the better news station. I am sure they will just leave it alone and let Fox handle their business privately... [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

No reason to be confused..Im sure CNN and MSNBC will generate a lot of noise about it (note my caveat about Rupert/Fox conspiracies). All 18 CNN and MSNBC viewers will get bombarded with it. BFD.

[/ QUOTE ]

Copernicus is dead on.... I just saw this story on CNN.

[/ QUOTE ]
By dead on you mean he originally stated that no one would pick up this story...then yeah you're right he was dead on.

[/ QUOTE ]

Reading comprehension problem or just dishonest?

"unless they subscribe to some Rupert Murdoch/Fox conspiracy idiocy."

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
New Yorkers despise him

[/ QUOTE ]

you dont know wtf youre talking about. If "New Yorkers" means Village Voice subscribers youve got a point. The vast majority loved him as mayor and would have been elected to another term.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
New Yorkers despise him

[/ QUOTE ]

you dont know wtf youre talking about. If "New Yorkers" means Village Voice subscribers youve got a point. The vast majority loved him as mayor and would have been elected to another term.

[/ QUOTE ]

He had very low approval ratings for long periods of time and without the meangingless 9/11 boost, his numbers would have been pretty goddamn low given how prosperous the period he mayored over was. Look at how the police and firemans groups have been opposing, and they seriously should be his bread and butter. He definitely wouldn't win NY in an election against any possible opponent.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
Reading comprehension problem or just dishonest?

"unless they subscribe to some Rupert Murdoch/Fox conspiracy idiocy."


[/ QUOTE ]
Oh I forgot, those idiots probably include all media outlets not control by Rupert Murdoch. Quite convenient if you ask me. Silly of me to assume when you said conspiracy idiocy to assume it was meant towards fringes news outlets and not every single major news outlet.

edit to add:
The story is on the top of the drudge report and it's on CNN and I saw a headline about it in the LA Times. That's all I found about it in 2 minutes of news searching.

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
New Yorkers despise him

[/ QUOTE ]

you dont know wtf youre talking about. If "New Yorkers" means Village Voice subscribers youve got a point. The vast majority loved him as mayor and would have been elected to another term.

[/ QUOTE ]

He had very low approval ratings for long periods of time and without the meangingless 9/11 boost, his numbers would have been pretty goddamn low given how prosperous the period he mayored over was. Look at how the police and firemans groups have been opposing, and they seriously should be his bread and butter. He definitely wouldn't win NY in an election against any possible opponent.

[/ QUOTE ]

You must be dosing too much.

come back to the real world

Re: New Rudy G. interview
 

"on September 10 Rudy couldn't have been elected dog catcher in New York City."

Love that quote..lol
I put this out there as Rudy G. for me is a disgrace. I am Canadian and obv can't vote for or against but as a side line observer the man makes my skin crawl.