NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

NSFW Be forewarned this is the saddest video I have ever seen. I have seen a lot of crazy and nasty stuff but this is the only one that has ever made me genuinely sad and angry. If you love animals you may not want to watch this video. I love animals that is why this video is so awful.

NSFW awful video NSFW

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

well i'll take one for the team and watch first

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

man he's sure beating up that racoon

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

omfg skinned alive that is pretty [censored] sad

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
NSFW Be forewarned this is the saddest video I have ever seen. I have seen a lot of crazy and nasty stuff but this is the only one that has ever made me genuinely sad and angry. If you love animals you may not want to watch this video. I love animals that is why this video is so awful.

NSFW awful video NSFW

[/ QUOTE ]

Laughs or Links

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

why are you posting this

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
why are you posting this

[/ QUOTE ]

I do not know. Probably the same reason someone who has a tragic event happen to them shares the story with someone they barely know. So someone else can sort of experience the tragedy you did. A psychologist can probably better explain it. Good question though.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

oh man oh man i wish i didnt watch it, i had to turn it off after he started skinning it. and that people tells you there is still evil in this world. any good person would squirm watching that brutality.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

jeez, i turned it off after the skinning started. ughh.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

I read comments and well, yeah not gonna watch.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

not gonna watch

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

This thread should be deleted.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
This thread should be deleted.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

Its horrible I must admit but there are plenty of things that are more horrible. If you want a benchmark to compare it to, i'd rather watch this than watch that MTV show Scarred where people get limbs broken and bones protruded in skating accidents. If you do watch it however prepare to feel an intense desire to kill every party responsible for the animal's suffering because the laughing in the background will just send you over the top. I for one don't mind having that feeling because i've killed before mwhahahahahahaha

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
Its horrible I must admit but there are plenty of things that are more horrible. If you want a benchmark to compare it to, i'd rather watch this than watch that MTV show Scarred where people get limbs broken and bones protruded in skating accidents. If you do watch it however prepare to feel an intense desire to kill every party responsible for the animal's suffering because the laughing in the background will just send you over the top. I for one don't mind having that feeling because i've killed before mwhahahahahahaha

[/ QUOTE ]

People and animals are quite different.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

thats terrible. Why arent they killing them before skinning?

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Its horrible I must admit but there are plenty of things that are more horrible. If you want a benchmark to compare it to, i'd rather watch this than watch that MTV show Scarred where people get limbs broken and bones protruded in skating accidents. If you do watch it however prepare to feel an intense desire to kill every party responsible for the animal's suffering because the laughing in the background will just send you over the top. I for one don't mind having that feeling because i've killed before mwhahahahahahaha

[/ QUOTE ]

People and animals are quite different.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'd love to get into a discussion, and i'm not being sarcastic at all

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
thats terrible. Why arent they killing them before skinning?

[/ QUOTE ]

one of the things i thought first

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Its horrible I must admit but there are plenty of things that are more horrible. If you want a benchmark to compare it to, i'd rather watch this than watch that MTV show Scarred where people get limbs broken and bones protruded in skating accidents. If you do watch it however prepare to feel an intense desire to kill every party responsible for the animal's suffering because the laughing in the background will just send you over the top. I for one don't mind having that feeling because i've killed before mwhahahahahahaha

[/ QUOTE ]

People and animals are quite different.

[/ QUOTE ]

Very true. For some reason I can watch videos where people die and not feel the least bit sad or angry compared to anything having to do with animals. I can honestly say I could kill a person way easier than an animal like a dog or a horse. Rats and whatever no big deal.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
I can honestly say I could kill a person way easier than an animal like a dog or a horse.

[/ QUOTE ]

seriously? why

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can honestly say I could kill a person way easier than an animal like a dog or a horse.

[/ QUOTE ]

seriously? why

[/ QUOTE ]

Dogs and horses are innocent, men are not.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can honestly say I could kill a person way easier than an animal like a dog or a horse.

[/ QUOTE ]

seriously? why

[/ QUOTE ]

Dogs and horses are innocent, men are not.

[/ QUOTE ]

i can't tell if i'm being leveled-- if i put a random person and a random dog in front of you and told you to kill one, then you would kill the person?

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can honestly say I could kill a person way easier than an animal like a dog or a horse.

[/ QUOTE ]

seriously? why

[/ QUOTE ]

Dogs and horses are innocent, men are not.

[/ QUOTE ]

but when you think about it, the guilt of man is a concept that has no meaning on its own. it's rooted in the idea that humanity works for its own advancement, but who's to say that the advancement of humanity is a good thing at all

http://www.bbspot.com/Images/News_Fe.../2002/oooh.jpg

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can honestly say I could kill a person way easier than an animal like a dog or a horse.

[/ QUOTE ]

seriously? why

[/ QUOTE ]

Under the most extreme circumstance where killing a person would be necessary, I think I could kill the person without much remorse. However one time I was driving home with my wife and hit a little dog that darted into the road. I stopped and called the SPCA and stayed with the dog which was still alive but it's leg was badly mangled. I to this day can't get over how bad I felt for that dog. I don't know I guess you can say i like dogs more than I like people.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can honestly say I could kill a person way easier than an animal like a dog or a horse.

[/ QUOTE ]

seriously? why

[/ QUOTE ]

Dogs and horses are innocent, men are not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Another reason as well.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

you are a monster sir

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can honestly say I could kill a person way easier than an animal like a dog or a horse.

[/ QUOTE ]

seriously? why

[/ QUOTE ]

Dogs and horses are innocent, men are not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Another reason as well.

[/ QUOTE ]

you may say that in principle, you would find it easier to kill a person but i highly doubt it would be true in practice

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

a serious question. provided you could get off with impunity and she would be magically revived with the wish of the Dragonballs, how much money minimum would you take to kill this girl



http://2clicks.files.wordpress.com/2...60511carly.jpg

for me, it's somewhere in the 3-4 billion dollar range before i even think about the offer

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can honestly say I could kill a person way easier than an animal like a dog or a horse.

[/ QUOTE ]

seriously? why

[/ QUOTE ]

If someone or something was attacking me, I could probably defend myself with my duty gun alot more than having to kill a helpless animal.

But in that video, those animals were helpless and not doing anything.

I only watched about 15 seconds so I really don't know what the rest of the video was about.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can honestly say I could kill a person way easier than an animal like a dog or a horse.

[/ QUOTE ]

seriously? why

[/ QUOTE ]

Dogs and horses are innocent, men are not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Another reason as well.

[/ QUOTE ]

you may say that in principle, you would find it easier to kill a person but i highly doubt it would be true in practice

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he's just stating that as a generalization. Animals are innocent by nature, and so relatively unaware of their surroundings that brutality toward them seems harsher than it does with humans.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

omg i pose logical points stop engoring me !

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
omg i pose logical points stop engoring me !

[/ QUOTE ]

What was your point exactly?

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
omg i pose logical points stop engoring me !

[/ QUOTE ]

What was your point exactly?

[/ QUOTE ]

the concept of humans being "guilty" is tied to our frame of reference as humans. our goal is to advance humanity and anyone woh goes against it is labeled "guilty" or whatever. you cant call animals innocent because our frame of reference might be as abstract and nonexistent as we perceive theres to ebe

so your reason for preferring to kill humans over animal can't be anywhere near universla

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can honestly say I could kill a person way easier than an animal like a dog or a horse.

[/ QUOTE ]

seriously? why

[/ QUOTE ]

Dogs and horses are innocent, men are not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Another reason as well.

[/ QUOTE ]

you may say that in principle, you would find it easier to kill a person but i highly doubt it would be true in practice

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he's just stating that as a generalization. Animals are innocent by nature, and so relatively unaware of their surroundings that brutality toward them seems harsher than it does with humans.

[/ QUOTE ]

i see what he's implying, i just think it would not go down that way if he actually had to choose.

edit: and i don't mean some extreme scenario where he kills a serial killer or kills a puppy. i'm saying in a vaccuum if i hand him a gun and show him a random dog and a random person he will probably kill the dog.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
omg i pose logical points stop engoring me !

[/ QUOTE ]

What was your point exactly?

[/ QUOTE ]

the concept of humans being "guilty" is tied to our frame of reference as humans. our goal is to advance humanity and anyone woh goes against it is labeled "guilty" or whatever. you cant call animals innocent because our frame of reference might be as abstract and nonexistent as we perceive theres to ebe

so your reason for preferring to kill humans over animal can't be anywhere near universla

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes it can and yes it is.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

and answer the question. provided that there was some magicla clock that would wind back time and undo it after you've done it but allow you to keep your money, how much money would you need to "kill" megan fox in that picture (a slow painful murder where she looks with those eyes of hers into yours pleading you not to, not a painless unconnected murder) i'd be surprised if you would be able to do it for any amount of money, stuff like that's impossible because we are intrinsically rooted empathetically to our own kind, and not to animls

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
omg i pose logical points stop engoring me !

[/ QUOTE ]

What was your point exactly?

[/ QUOTE ]

the concept of humans being "guilty" is tied to our frame of reference as humans. our goal is to advance humanity and anyone woh goes against it is labeled "guilty" or whatever. you cant call animals innocent because our frame of reference might be as abstract and nonexistent as we perceive theres to ebe

so your reason for preferring to kill humans over animal can't be anywhere near universla

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes it can and yes it is.

[/ QUOTE ]

But this is based on the widely accepted "common goal of humanity" namely to advance and protect humanity. there's nothing set in stone to say that this is perfect and this is what it should be. it's merely what gives humanity the best chance to survive and advance, it's not necessarily "right",. if you change the goal, you change the rules that we should follow in order ot best acheive that goal

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can honestly say I could kill a person way easier than an animal like a dog or a horse.

[/ QUOTE ]

seriously? why

[/ QUOTE ]

Dogs and horses are innocent, men are not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Another reason as well.

[/ QUOTE ]

you may say that in principle, you would find it easier to kill a person but i highly doubt it would be true in practice

[/ QUOTE ]

I think he's just stating that as a generalization. Animals are innocent by nature, and so relatively unaware of their surroundings that brutality toward them seems harsher than it does with humans.

[/ QUOTE ]

i see what he's implying, i just think it would not go down that way if he actually had to choose.

edit: and i don't mean some extreme scenario where he kills a serial killer or kills a puppy. i'm saying in a vaccuum if i hand him a gun and show him a random dog and a random person he will probably kill the dog.

[/ QUOTE ]
If i had to choose of course I would kill an animal rather than a human being. But if that human had done something to me personally where I could kill them than I would and feel less emotion than I would if forced to kill an innocent animal.

Dogs and horses are innocent, men are not.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
and answer the question. provided that there was some magicla clock that would wind back time and undo it after you've done it but allow you to keep your money, how much money would you need to "kill" megan fox in that picture (a slow painful murder where she looks with those eyes of hers into yours pleading you not to, not a painless unconnected murder) i'd be surprised if you would be able to do it for any amount of money, stuff like that's impossible because we are intrinsically rooted empathetically to our own kind, and not to animls

[/ QUOTE ]

No amount of money in the world could ever make me kill someone I otherwise didn't intend on killing.

Re: NSFW Not for the faint of heart
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
and answer the question. provided that there was some magicla clock that would wind back time and undo it after you've done it but allow you to keep your money, how much money would you need to "kill" megan fox in that picture (a slow painful murder where she looks with those eyes of hers into yours pleading you not to, not a painless unconnected murder) i'd be surprised if you would be able to do it for any amount of money, stuff like that's impossible because we are intrinsically rooted empathetically to our own kind, and not to animls

[/ QUOTE ]

No amount of money in the world could ever make me kill someone I otherwise didn't intend on killing.

[/ QUOTE ]

ok now it's cleared up