Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   400nl deep bluff (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=540693)

nuggetz87 11-07-2007 05:41 PM

400nl deep bluff
 
villain is a 20/18 who i don't really have history with. sometimes i just give up on the flop after they call oop but not this time...

Poker Stars, $2/$4 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker Hand History Converter

BB: $446.50
UTG: $764.10
MP: $328
CO: $1,136.35
Hero (BTN): $713.10
SB: $213.75

Pre-Flop: 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (BTN)
UTG folds, MP calls $4, <font color="red">CO raises to $18</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $62</font>, 3 folds, CO calls $44

Flop: ($134) 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
CO checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $103</font>, CO calls $103

Turn: ($340) K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players)
CO checks, Hero checks

River: ($340) K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">CO bets $170</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $548.10 and is All-In</font>

flyfishingnut10 11-07-2007 05:47 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
I almost think we can just call this river bet.

Morrek 11-07-2007 05:48 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
I'd rather call (or bet turn for that matter)

stackingboxes 11-07-2007 05:50 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
u trying to bluff out QQ exactly?

wheelz 11-07-2007 05:50 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff *DELETED*
 
Post deleted by wheelz

flyfishingnut10 11-07-2007 05:52 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
Relevant questions:

1) Does he c/r this flop with 44?
2) Does he think you'd bet the turn with AK?

flyfishingnut10 11-07-2007 05:53 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
FWIW I think calling and shoving are both viable and seem pretty close EV-wise; I'd opt for the former though because it is inherently less variance.

nuggetz87 11-07-2007 05:55 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
it would be nice if i had a better read on his range but like i said i haven't played with him much, only 100 or 200 hands.

i think a J is really likely though (as well as underpair of course).

keikiwai 11-07-2007 05:58 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
you can't call here, i think a call is only profitable on this board in an unraised pot

i think it's good theoretically, i mean he's got to fold a lot of pocket pairs and some Jacks... but from the action on previous streets he doesn't have a Jack

nuggetz87 11-07-2007 06:01 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
keik, you don't think he has a J ever and you also don't think we can call??

also if villain is one of you guys do you call the shove with a J?

DiceMan14 11-07-2007 06:08 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
Looks like a blocker bet with QQ, TT. Your shove represents AK, which does conform with your line. I dont think there are too many hands other than JJ hes calling with here OOP. I like the shove.

keikiwai 11-07-2007 06:08 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
[ QUOTE ]
keik, you don't think he has a J ever and you also don't think we can call??

[/ QUOTE ]

sorry.... forgot about counterfeiting.....
which leans it a little toward calling

i still don't think calling w a J is good here... i mean AK is a reasonable hand for you (even w turn ch)

FionnMac 11-07-2007 06:13 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
looks good

blah-blah-blah 11-07-2007 06:52 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
lets say his range is QQ/AJ/JTs/TT-88 (reasonable imo), and assume he folds QQ 60% and Jx 40%. lets compare call vs. shove.

36 combos of TT-88, 24 combos of QQ/AJ/JTs so:

Call EV: +$510 x 60% + -$170 x 40% = +$238

Shove EV: +$510 x (60% + (20% x 60%) + (20% x 40%)) + (-$548.10 x (20% x 40% + 20% x 60%) = +$298.38

dunno what a realistic fold % would be but if we assume he folds QQ and Jx w/ the same frequency, he needs to fold about 35.7% of the time to make it as much EV as calling.

craig1120 11-07-2007 07:45 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
People saying QQ: You think he expects OP to call w/ A high often enough to be value betting QQ on the river? Seems unlikely.

I agree with OP that villain has a J like over 75% of the time. That being said, I really don't know if it's a good bluff or not. I think I like it though.

AAismyfriend 11-07-2007 07:51 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
I agree that calling has a lot of merit here for obvious reasons but you can easily rep AK here with this line, and make him fold QQ, so shoving is much better IMO. nh.

Irish Mafia 11-07-2007 11:55 PM

Re: 400nl deep bluff
 
If I were villain i'd call w/ a J. That being said I don't think villain has a J that often - I mean is he expecting hands like QQ, AK, AA to: a) bet the turn (as opposed to checking behind); and b) call a CR? I would think a J would raise the flop and/or lead turn.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.