![]() |
EricW Thread Results
Unweighted scores;
BAN: 21 DO NOT BAN: 37 NOW YOU WAIT FOR WEIGHTING. |
Re: EricW Thread Results
u have lost weighting recently so should be interesting
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
oh silly diddums...
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
Basically, the majority didn't want him banned but an extremely loud minority of Dids butt-buddies weighted votes will decide the end result?
Fascinating. |
Re: EricW Thread Results
The problem is that more people who voted no voted no because they think Dids is a bad mod, instead of voting no on the premise that Ericw is a good poster, which he clearly is not.
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
awesome another ericw thread
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
where's my vote for banning blutarski?
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
where's our votes for banning blutarski? [/ QUOTE ] |
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
The problem is that more people who voted no voted no because they think Dids is a bad mod, instead of voting no on the premise that Ericw is a good poster, which he clearly is not. [/ QUOTE ] exactly, it turned into a referendum on dids' modding |
Re: EricW Thread Results
Well, I voted not to ban, and I like Dids modding mostly.
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
The problem is that more people who voted no voted no because they think Dids is a bad mod, instead of voting no on the premise that Ericw is a good poster, which he clearly is not. [/ QUOTE ] He matters, which is something you can't say for pretty much 98% of this forum. And he's had some really funny moments. Off the top of my head I can think of at least 5 quality threads from Ericw but absolutely NONE from Dids. |
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The problem is that more people who voted no voted no because they think Dids is a bad mod, instead of voting no on the premise that Ericw is a good poster, which he clearly is not. [/ QUOTE ] He matters, which is something you can't say for pretty much 98% of this forum. And he's had some really funny moments. Off the top of my head I can think of at least 5 quality threads from Ericw but absolutely NONE from Dids. [/ QUOTE ] .....in BBV4L....which he's been in for a little over a month. Dids has been around far longer and in many more forums than EricW, who has never had a serious post for anything on this entire forum. |
Re: EricW Thread Results
i dont matter in bbv4l, does that mean im gonna get banned? [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
Some people actually read outside of BB4VL?
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
The problem is that more people who voted no voted no because they think Dids is a bad mod, instead of voting no on the premise that Ericw is a good poster, which he clearly is not. [/ QUOTE ] There's a difference between being a good poster, which is clearly not the case with Eric, and being a poster that should be banned. When I went through and totaled the votes, votes obviously placed out of Dids hate are discounted. However, contrary to what Gild thinks, most people actually gave pretty solid explanations as to why they felt the way they did, and it had more to do with their feelings on EricW and bannings in general than anything to do with me. |
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
When I went through and totaled the votes, votes obviously placed out of Dids hate were double counted. [/ QUOTE ] FYP |
Re: EricW Thread Results
OK.
Final results. It's pretty equal in terms of good posters who are anit/pro banning. Essentially not enough to change the fact that the "no ban" vote has a strong lead. The only hesitation is that beyond diebitter, who well, is diebitter, Eric is super hated on by the mods. Still, I don't really see enough in his posting to warrent a ban when most folks in BBV4L don't want him gone. Thusly, EricW will remain unbanned by my hand. I'll even lift the containment thread on him (and me!!) but if he starts making stupid and/or trollish threads again, I'm pretty sure that if I don't get him, another mod will. Go forth and frolic Eric, but use something better than your own best judgement, lest your freedom be short lived. also here is a salad I made two nights ago http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2359/...7c6754482f.jpg |
Re: EricW Thread Results
hayy dids how bout you leave ericw alone and put him on ignore. Also i know theres that flood thing where u can limit his ops, do that too
yayy ev1 will be happy again! |
Re: EricW Thread Results
imagine how happy i must feel with 3 ps3s
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
yay <3 dids and ericw
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
So dids is releasing EricW into the wild. This should be fun.
http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h5...elmer_fudd.gif |
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
hayy dids how bout you leave ericw alone and put him on ignore. Also i know theres that flood thing where u can limit his ops, do that too yayy ev1 will be happy again! [/ QUOTE ] mods can't put anyone on ignore, and vice versa |
Re: EricW Thread Results
lock this and all subsequent atf crap about banning w/e blahblahblah k thx
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] hayy dids how bout you leave ericw alone and put him on ignore. Also i know theres that flood thing where u can limit his ops, do that too yayy ev1 will be happy again! [/ QUOTE ] mods can't put anyone on ignore, and vice versa [/ QUOTE ] lozl, thank u for being smarter than me and pointing this out. i wasnt thinking |
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
lock this and all subsequent atf crap about banning w/e blahblahblah k thx [/ QUOTE ] ban obv [ QUOTE ] lozl, thank u for being smarter than me and pointing this out. i wasnt thinking [/ QUOTE ] you're ahead of your time, a true prophet. A+ |
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
Thusly, EricW will remain unbanned by my hand. I'll even lift the containment thread on him (and me!!) [/ QUOTE ] http://www.able2uk.com/pinky_brain.gif |
Re: EricW Thread Results
ban GA
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
what are you using for country weights?
Canada votes should be counted X10 imo because there are 30 million Canadians and only a few Canadians voted. |
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
what are you using for country weights? Canada votes should be counted X10 imo because there are 30 million Canadians and only a few Canadians voted. [/ QUOTE ] True 7 and counting |
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
what are you using for country weights? Canada votes should be counted X10 imo because there are 30 million Canadians and only a few Canadians voted. [/ QUOTE ] http://www.thegreenhead.com/imgs/can...-tshirt-sm.jpg also, ban |
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
what are you using for country weights? Canada votes should be counted X10 imo because there are 30 million Canadians and only a few Canadians voted. [/ QUOTE ] Retards from Toronto should count as less since they believe they're Americans anyways. |
Re: EricW Thread Results
hey gildwulf, have you ever loved a woman?
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
Ban Pdirty
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
Mods can ignore people, it's just been decided that we shouldn't, for obv reasons.
I have one poster on ignore, and that's just because he insists on proving that he's a Hollywood insider by posting spoilers and I refuse to let him ruin my good time. |
Re: EricW Thread Results
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] what are you using for country weights? Canada votes should be counted X10 imo because there are 30 million Canadians and only a few Canadians voted. [/ QUOTE ] Retards from Toronto should count as less since they believe they're Americans anyways. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
Re: EricW Thread Results
Who's this EricW? Cliffnotes anyone?
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
[ QUOTE ]
Who's this EricW? Cliffnotes anyone? [/ QUOTE ] http://www.pacersdigest.com/apache2-...ies/picard.jpg |
Re: EricW Thread Results
I'm impressed with your decision Dids, and with your salad. More so with the salad tbh, but yeah, you did an honorable thing here.
|
Re: EricW Thread Results
Huh? I always thought you hated salad babe?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.