Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=56)
-   -   A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=534762)

LuckyMux 10-30-2007 05:15 PM

A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
Absolute Fraud – the Mark Seif angle. (LONG post – please don’t quote the whole thing)

It begins 20 months ago, with the following post at http://www.internettexasholdem.com/phpbb...as-vt34808.html, on Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:05 pm:

[ QUOTE ]
Post subject: At Absolute Poker......I can't believe how low this was

I am still amazed and beyond disgusted at what I saw and heard very late last night/early in the morning at Absolute Poker...and I don't even know what to do about it. The irony of this happening the night after my "poker ethics" post is too much, also:

Anyone who has watched the 75/150 game there knows that Mark Seif (who is the site's signature pro and part-owner) has been extremely abusive lately of the other players when he's at the table.......always banning other players' chat in an instant and threatening account closure, etc. He has lost a lot a money at that 75 game (the resident pros consider him the big fish there) and it's been pretty obvious lately that it was starting to get to him more and more.

Anyway......stuckinpgh (my good friend Mike) is one of a handful of high-limit players who have managed to get under Mark's skin in recent weeks. It was evident that Seif was not fond of Mike and would tilt sometimes. Only this time, it turned out to be a lot worse than harmless trash talk.

Last night, Seif was actually having a good session for a few hours at the 75 table. Eventually the game mostly broke up, and it was just Seif and Mike heads up. After some see-saw action, Mike started to get the best of him again and was ahead maybe 4 or 5 k for the HU time, I'd say. At that point, Seif says something like "one second punk"....leaves the table.....then comes back about a minute later and announces "I'm ready to take you down."

Play then started again......and I saw something that I never have before in all my on-line poker play: obvious manipulation. Every hand was a complete dissection based on whatever Mike was holding (third pair was capped by Seif if Mike was behind or bluffing, for example.) About 10 or 12 k was basically stolen in 15 minutes (over maybe 100 hands), and here's the kicker: he was so pissed and beyond rational thinking that he actually wanted Mike to know what was going on! For example, Mike had K9 on one hand and flopped a boat. Seif was first to act after the flop, and FOLDED OUT OF TURN just that time. I had heard that Seif was having some personal problems, but who would've ever guessed that he could be capable of this. Between that possibility and the abuse that he's taken from the pros (in chat, $ lost, and pride lost at the tables), he must've finally snapped and lowered himself THAT much to get some revenge. We were simply stunned, and all Mike could do at the time was leave the game and withdraw the rest of his money (which he did get already.)

I have never played in a game with Mark Seif myself (or ever said a word to him), so none of this information is based on anything personal between him and me. I'm only trying to help out a good friend here and to call some needed attention to what happened. If Seif is capable of this, then it's a scary thought to trust your money to that site. And to think I was just about to deposit to play the 75 game myself.

[/ QUOTE ]

Unlike here on 2+2, AP actually responds to this post (note: this is long before the POTRIPPER incident proves that a super-user account, aka ‘God-mode’, does actually exist on AP and is used to defraud players):

[ QUOTE ]
I can assure everyone that there is absolutely no way that Mark Seif is able to see his opponent's hole cards, nor does he have any ability to manipulate the outcome of the games at Absolute Poker… The system at Absolute Poker is built in such a way that no one is able to access information on player hole cards in real time, and Mark is not an exception.

[/ QUOTE ]

Without any further evidence, the OP and friend don't really have anywhere to go with this, and the matter soon drops off the radar. Oddly, neither AP nor Mark Seif provides, or offers to provide, the hand histories which would clear BOTH their good names.

Seif doesn’t bother to keep his own HH either, but that’s okay, because according to AP’s license (Kahwanakee Gaming Commission rule 245), AP must keep hand history data for a minimum of five years – or face a $1000+ fine for each one it deletes.

This is what Stuckin has to say about that episode (as posted here on 2+2 recently), for all those who still think he ‘recants’ the story:

[ QUOTE ]
1. I changed my mind about quitting.
2. I play there every day.
3. I no longer play site owners hu for big stakes.
4. At this point I don't think I was cheated, if I was it probably wasn't the only time playing online.
5. I no longer play site owners hu for big stakes.

[/ QUOTE ]

Mark Seif has said he ‘owns a major stake’ in AP previously, and never corrects anyone about all these mentions of him still being a part-owner.

Fast forward to the POTRIPPER scandal. Again, there is the allegation that someone can see the hole cards on Absolute. On October 10, Seif allows 'someone' at AP (we are left to guess who) to post AP’s official response on his personal blog at Bluff. AP has investigated and come to the following conclusions:

[ QUOTE ]
"A ‘super-user’ account does not exist in our software… …The back-end of the Absolute Poker software prevents the possibility of any such feature."

[/ QUOTE ]

Then, the smoking gun emerges. POTRIPPER really did know what the hole cards were, thanks to ‘super-user’ account (#363) which has been around since the dawn of AP – so this is no ‘outside hacker’. Not only that, but the IP address of account #363 traces to the home of Scott Tom – the de facto boss of AP and close friend of fellow AP part-owner Mark Seif.

On October 17, another amazing statement is released via (part-owner) Mark Seif’s blog. With the stunning ‘new evidence’ of massive fraud (which, er… they had before anyone else did) AP is now concerned enough to call… Gaming Associates, who will investigate further.

Cast-iron evidence is clearly not enough for AP. There is still no admission of any wrongdoing whatsoever, not even of a security breach – and AP declares that Scott Tom has not been involved with the company for over a year. It also threatens legal action to all who dare question its integrity. The statement is signed ‘AP management’.

To date, Mark Seif has never revealed who actually sent him those two statements - which AP now acknowledges were the attempted covering-up by the fraudster/s themselves.

It’s around this time Mark Seif starts thinking about Feb 15, 2006. The next day, he releases his own statement on his blog. After basically repeating the same garbage as AP (“We should wait for more smoking guns”), he also says this:

[ QUOTE ]
With respect to a session I played two years ago heads-up on AP in the 75/150 game, against "stuckinpgh" (I believe that is the name) that has been the subject of some discussion, I won fair and square. I am 99.99% certain that I did NOT fold, when first to act (not facing a bet) on the flop when my opponent claims he flopped a full house. That is complete nonsense and I welcome anyone to try to disprove that. I believe my opponent has recanted his story and I am happy that he was man enough to do that because that is the truth.

I don't normally reply to or acknowledge such ridiculous claims, but in light of the current situation, I wanted to be unambiguously clear that I engaged in no wrong-doing whatsoever. I don't know what else to say other than what I have already said about that incident or the AP situation at this time.

[/ QUOTE ]

The rest of us know what he could say, and conspicuously doesn’t. The same thing that damned POTRIPPER and Scott Tom actually has the power to exonerate Mark Seif; hand histories.

Sadly for Mark, by the time he asks for them (using IM chat – almost as though he knows he’ll be posting the chat as ‘evidence’ on 2+2 later), it turns out his beloved, part-owned AP has illegally deleted those hand histories that would prove his innocence. Would you believe it!

In fact, it’s deleted all of them older than 2-6 months, depending on which AP employee you talk to. Any cheating before then – including by POTRIPPER, Scott Tom, AJ Green or even Mark Seif - cannot ever be proved.

At this point, Seif again threatens legal action against anyone who might think about defaming his good reputation, and goes on TV in the most ill-advised PR move since Nixon debated with JFK.

And, apparently, a ‘witch-hunt’ against him begins for Absolutely no reason.

apefish 10-30-2007 05:22 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
In on the ground floor of something.

ibluffoldladies 10-30-2007 05:28 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
Nice summary Lucky. This conversation is relevant.

[ QUOTE ]
http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...t=all&vc=1
Hey guys, somebody posted this earlier but hasn't gotten any attention. 3/4 down the page it talks about Seif's supposed ownership stake in AP, as well as him comparing limit hold'em to doing heroine. Very interesting....

MARK SEIF:i dont need to do heroin
MARK SEIF:this is better
MARK SEIF:i live for being called a donk by 2 plus 2ers and NWP pros
MARK SEIF:for me this is work $200k not 20k
MARK SEIF:worth
MARK SEIF:seriously guys - all i do is give you money
MARK SEIF:be nice to the fishies\
MARK SEIF:i enjoy playin every hand and blowin 20k
MARK SEIF:i really do
MARK SEIF:just take the money and have some class
MARK SEIF:that's all we ask
MARK SEIF:i'm not the site rep
MARK SEIF:i am a mjor stake owner
MARK SEIF:this is my business
MARK SEIF:i want what's in AP's best interst - that's all
MARK SEIF:i dont care if i lose
STUCKINPGH:I've seen you rip off some big wins here too
MARK SEIF:i win occasionally but i really dont care about it
MARK SEIF:its much funner to just play evey hand and raise every stree
MARK SEIF:t
MARK SEIF:its my heroin


[/ QUOTE ]

genius55 10-30-2007 05:28 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
we really do need those hand histories lol. I don't believe that AP deleted them, seems kinda fishy.

highhustla 10-30-2007 05:39 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
Don't forget the part where he shows up here at 2+2 to "answer your questions and engage you in a meaningful discussion to try to figure things out"--but only lasts 3 posts before he runs off with his tail between his legs.

Alobar 10-30-2007 05:44 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
*yawn*

highhustla 10-30-2007 05:48 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
so if you're yawning, then you believe Seif?

You don't have a problem if he is friends with Scott Time, or a part-owner of AP?

Synergistic Explosions 10-30-2007 05:53 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
The thing is, nobody who plays against Mark wants him to get in trouble for obvious reasons. So if the players want him to stay, those of us who don't play him should let it be.

[Deleted User] 10-30-2007 05:56 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
lolseifaments

mistere45 10-30-2007 06:02 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
To keep quiet about corruption because of monetary gain ... What makes that any better than any AP party involved in the cover-up??

RikaKazak 10-30-2007 06:06 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
The thing is, nobody who plays against Mark wants him to get in trouble for obvious reasons. So if the players want him to stay, those of us who don't play him should let it be.

[/ QUOTE ]

ummmm...no

mistere45 10-30-2007 06:15 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
So if Seif continues to "chip dump", we should all keep quiet. hmm ...

HAE 10-30-2007 06:24 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
..

Seif doesn’t bother to keep his own HH either, but that’s okay, because according to AP’s license (Kahwanakee Gaming Commission rule 245), AP must keep hand history data for a minimum of five years – or face a $1000+ fine for each one it deletes.

..

[/ QUOTE ]

At the time AP had a Six Nations license, and their servers was probably located there. (This can be part of the problem with getting the HH.)

LuckyMux 10-30-2007 07:14 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
Well spotted. According to this link, the Six Nations Gambling Commission consisted of three people, who were all fired and replaced after letting their one and only licensee (yup - AP was all they had!) operate from the reservation without approval.

http://online.casinocity.com/jurisdi...ion.cfm?Id=301

Still, it isn't the reason those HH were deleted. There is a simple proof that the 'server move' had nothing to do with it but I'm not about to help AP's defence. I think you'll work it out when you follow that link.

I will, however, respectfully draw your attention to Seif's conversation with AP Support, where a second excuse for deleting those crucial records was also given (two separate reasons - how's that for bad luck!): apparently 30Gb of HH data per month - yes, that's fully half an iPod - is just too much for an online poker company to deal with...

EDIT: Sod it - AP is beyond help. The reason the server move is irrelevant is because it AP would have all the HH since it happened. They don't.

Hard disks don't self-delete or leap out of servers. It takes a deliberate act to wipe out recorded data.

"The audit won't be limited to a certain time-frame - we are allowing them to see the entire two-months-worth of our records..."

luvetoholdem 10-30-2007 07:18 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
So is UB safe to play?
Or should I just quit them both.

suzzer99 10-30-2007 07:23 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
I don't see how anyone could be comfortable with UB until they completely dissociate with AP. And even then who knows if they really are or not.

Red_Diamond 10-30-2007 07:29 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
The thing is, nobody who plays against Mark wants him to get in trouble for obvious reasons. So if the players want him to stay, those of us who don't play him should let it be.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok,I get this logic. Because cheaters are poor players, we should keep them in business.

Now my question is, so when do you know when he is NOT cheating? Be careful when you answer that, because it's important.

pokergrader 10-30-2007 07:50 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
The thing is, nobody who plays against Mark wants him to get in trouble for obvious reasons. So if the players want him to stay, those of us who don't play him should let it be.

[/ QUOTE ]

He isn't going to get in trouble. There is pretty much no legal recourse for anybody who was cheated. *If* he is a cheater and cover up artist, he deserves to be labeled as one forever. Would that really affect him? Probably not, but it is the least we can do.

beaver 10-30-2007 07:51 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
So how many different excuses have they come up with for the missing hand histories? The more [contradicting] stories that they tell, the more obvious it is that they are not being entirely truthful. It's a shame there isn't a hand history of Seif folding out of turn to his opponent's K9 full house...

cpitt398 10-30-2007 07:58 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
Whats the bet referred to in the OP's title?

Red_Diamond 10-30-2007 08:04 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
Alright, just maybe AP was running a little short on the budget and couldn't afford the services of this little puppy:

http://www.futureshop.ca/multimedia/...e/10077146.jpg

What and where is it?

http://www.futureshop.ca/catalog/proddet...mp;catid=23795#


For 99.99$ a lot of this mess could have totally been avoided. Considering the fine for deleting one hand history is about 1 grand, they could have bought ten of these for each hand that went into the trashcan.



Note:: I am not affiliated with Futureshop, and/or AP, and/or Mark Seif in any way...

SuperSnort 10-30-2007 08:13 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
I really think everyone should boycot AP, i would love it as i am just hating them and seif more and more after each post i read and posts by them, and seeing how they denied it all in the beginning. Sort of reminds me of prison break how they got the gov. just killed random people and got away with it. hopefully this will be different!

LuckyMux 10-30-2007 08:31 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
From an interview with Mark Seif, July 2005:
http://www.pokernews.com/news/2005/0...-spotlight.htm

[ QUOTE ]
PN: Did the heads up matches you played at AbsolutePoker.com assist you in any way?

MS: (Laughs again) I don't know if it did or not! I think I lost about 70% of those matches that I played there. It was funny because it became a running joke there, that I have a great heads up record in face to face competition, but online I was getting clobbered! But I am very happy to play there at AbsolutePoker and I am proud to be associated with them as their Director of Operations.

[/ QUOTE ]

"It's a mystery wrapped in a riddle inside an enigma! The shooters don't even know! Don't you get it? F*ck, man!" - David Ferrie, JFK

Synergistic Explosions 10-30-2007 08:33 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The thing is, nobody who plays against Mark wants him to get in trouble for obvious reasons. So if the players want him to stay, those of us who don't play him should let it be.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok,I get this logic. Because cheaters are poor players, we should keep them in business.

Now my question is, so when do you know when he is NOT cheating? Be careful when you answer that, because it's important.

[/ QUOTE ]

To answer your question when do you know he is NOT cheating, I suppose when he's losing 10k to one of the regular 2+2 players who post here about how great and fishy AP is.

From all the pro Seif replies I've seen, they seem to be posters who play HL at AP vs the biggest fish there Mark Seif. I'm thinking if they are fine with him, then why shouldn't I be, someone who doesn't play there.

Protecting a fish is not unheard of. I really don't care one way or the other though. I'm all for finding the truth. Just throwing it out there why maybe so many are defending him.

PartyGirlUK 10-30-2007 08:39 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
Hang on, AP has to pay $1k for every HH under 5 yrs old that they've deleted? Doesn't this render them busto?

LuckyMux 10-30-2007 08:50 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
Hang on, AP has to pay $1k for every HH under 5 yrs old that they've deleted? Doesn't this render them busto?

[/ QUOTE ]

The rule says the KGC MAY impose the fines, it doesn't have to - and nothing will force it either way except PR. The fine can be far greater than $1k too - a million dollars per offence if I recall correctly.

Possibly, it can only apply that rule back to when it took over the license and server hosting for AP, which was just over a year ago. Perhaps the KGC insisted the rule (#245) applied to all the records AP already had - only they know.

Doesn't really matter though; the KGC could only 'bust AP' if AP wasn't hiding behind a dozen shell companies operating out of Costa Rica.

Still, don't worry about AP. Those 10%-interest-paying player accounts will surely help...

highhustla 10-30-2007 09:07 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The thing is, nobody who plays against Mark wants him to get in trouble for obvious reasons. So if the players want him to stay, those of us who don't play him should let it be.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok,I get this logic. Because cheaters are poor players, we should keep them in business.

Now my question is, so when do you know when he is NOT cheating? Be careful when you answer that, because it's important.

[/ QUOTE ]

To answer your question when do you know he is NOT cheating, I suppose when he's losing 10k to one of the regular 2+2 players who post here about how great and fishy AP is.

From all the pro Seif replies I've seen, they seem to be posters who play HL at AP vs the biggest fish there Mark Seif. I'm thinking if they are fine with him, then why shouldn't I be, someone who doesn't play there.

Protecting a fish is not unheard of. I really don't care one way or the other though. I'm all for finding the truth. Just throwing it out there why maybe so many are defending him.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because poker will not be fun for everyone after selfish fks like ike ruin it for us.

nevadaJACK 10-30-2007 09:44 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
Well, if anyone really wants to make give Seif a hard time, you could report him (and his ownership stake in Absolute) to the State bar association (of wherever he is licensed as an attorney) and let them determine whether his ownership of Absolute is unlawful or worthy of getting him disbarred.

Injection 10-30-2007 10:11 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
So how many different excuses have they come up with for the missing hand histories? The more [contradicting] stories that they tell, the more obvious it is that they are not being entirely truthful. It's a shame there isn't a hand history of Seif folding out of turn to his opponent's K9 full house...

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

JPFisher55 10-30-2007 10:12 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
Well, if anyone really wants to make give Seif a hard time, you could report him (and his ownership stake in Absolute) to the State bar association (of wherever he is licensed as an attorney) and let them determine whether his ownership of Absolute is unlawful or worthy of getting him disbarred.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm an attorney in St. Louis, MO. Mr. Seif's ownership of AP is not related to any practice of law and not a basis for disbarment or any other discipline. However, proof of stealing by seeing opponents hole cards might be grounds for discipline based on immoral activity. However, a criminal conviction would be needed and still might result in some punishment short of disbarrment. Of course, if he did this to a legal client, then he would likely be disbarred, but again, a criminal conviction is the needed proof. In other words, don't hold your breath.

Kiddmother 10-30-2007 10:30 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
Well, I still contend that Seif said in his interview that AP will err on the side of clients and overpay rather than potentially shortchange any accounts. I think he should definitely have AP do the stand up thing and pay back the funds to this guy's account since there are soooo many screwups on AP's part on this.

crashjr 10-30-2007 10:44 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well, if anyone really wants to make give Seif a hard time, you could report him (and his ownership stake in Absolute) to the State bar association (of wherever he is licensed as an attorney) and let them determine whether his ownership of Absolute is unlawful or worthy of getting him disbarred.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm an attorney in St. Louis, MO. Mr. Seif's ownership of AP is not related to any practice of law and not a basis for disbarment or any other discipline. However, proof of stealing by seeing opponents hole cards might be grounds for discipline based on immoral activity. However, a criminal conviction would be needed and still might result in some punishment short of disbarrment. Of course, if he did this to a legal client, then he would likely be disbarred, but again, a criminal conviction is the needed proof. In other words, don't hold your breath.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am a California attorney. So is Mark Seif. Reporting him to the bar at this time is pointless. I can't imagine the bar investigating this mess, and it had nothing to do with the practice of law.

If there is ever credible evidence of him cheating or otherwise stealing from players at AP, I'll lead the charge. But I haven't seen a single shred of evidence that leads me to believe that Seif was involved and/or personally gained from this scandal at all.

You don't have to like him, and you don't need to think he is a good public speaker - I agree with the masses that the latest interview was nothing short of a bloody third trimester abortion of an attempt at addressing the AP scandal. You can think that he is the biggest douchebag in the poker world since Dutch Boyd. None of that makes him a thief. None of it.

The fact that he is so unpopular here, yet no one has found anything on him yet and no one on the inside at AP forwarded anything to Nat or Adar or Josem leads me to believe that Seif - to the extent that he says he never cheated or gained from the superuser account capability - is telling the truth.

Seriously though, if you get hard evidence of him cheating beyond some very weak accusations surrounding a HU session from two years ago, I'll carry the flag in the charge to the state bar disciplinary committee.

Shooz 10-30-2007 10:49 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
You can think that he is the biggest douchebag in the poker world since Dutch Boyd. None of that makes him a thief. None of it.


[/ QUOTE ]
lol you picked a really bad person to compare him against for anyone who currently has money on AP...

ikestoys 10-30-2007 10:51 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well, if anyone really wants to make give Seif a hard time, you could report him (and his ownership stake in Absolute) to the State bar association (of wherever he is licensed as an attorney) and let them determine whether his ownership of Absolute is unlawful or worthy of getting him disbarred.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm an attorney in St. Louis, MO. Mr. Seif's ownership of AP is not related to any practice of law and not a basis for disbarment or any other discipline. However, proof of stealing by seeing opponents hole cards might be grounds for discipline based on immoral activity. However, a criminal conviction would be needed and still might result in some punishment short of disbarrment. Of course, if he did this to a legal client, then he would likely be disbarred, but again, a criminal conviction is the needed proof. In other words, don't hold your breath.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am a California attorney. So is Mark Seif. Reporting him to the bar at this time is pointless. I can't imagine the bar investigating this mess, and it had nothing to do with the practice of law.

If there is ever credible evidence of him cheating or otherwise stealing from players at AP, I'll lead the charge. But I haven't seen a single shred of evidence that leads me to believe that Seif was involved and/or personally gained from this scandal at all.

You don't have to like him, and you don't need to think he is a good public speaker - I agree with the masses that the latest interview was nothing short of a bloody third trimester abortion of an attempt at addressing the AP scandal. You can think that he is the biggest douchebag in the poker world since Dutch Boyd. None of that makes him a thief. None of it.

The fact that he is so unpopular here, yet no one has found anything on him yet and no one on the inside at AP forwarded anything to Nat or Adar or Josem leads me to believe that Seif - to the extent that he says he never cheated or gained from the superuser account capability - is telling the truth.

Seriously though, if you get hard evidence of him cheating beyond some very weak accusations surrounding a HU session from two years ago, I'll carry the flag in the charge to the state bar disciplinary committee.

[/ QUOTE ]

wow great post, not what i was expecting

Slider 10-30-2007 10:52 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
Ya I still haven't been fully paid by AP either for hands with Graycat that happened in May/June... Going to call them tomorrow.

ikestoys 10-30-2007 11:25 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
Ya I still haven't been fully paid by AP either for hands with Graycat that happened in May/June... Going to call them tomorrow.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pretty sure May/June is before the cheating window, but GL!

mntbikr15 10-30-2007 11:37 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Ya I still haven't been fully paid by AP either for hands with Graycat that happened in May/June... Going to call them tomorrow.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pretty sure May/June is before the cheating window, but GL!

[/ QUOTE ]

It IS before the cheating window. You were just beat.

Synergistic Explosions 10-30-2007 11:42 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Ya I still haven't been fully paid by AP either for hands with Graycat that happened in May/June... Going to call them tomorrow.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pretty sure May/June is before the cheating window, but GL!

[/ QUOTE ]

It IS before the cheating window. You were just beat.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cheating window = day they deleted all their HH's?

mntbikr15 10-30-2007 11:46 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
Right around the time of the 8.0 update(mid august) is when the limit cheaters started playing diffrently and winning, so depending on which consipracy theory you subscibe to, that was when it all began.

True or not, thats when they are reimbursing players for...not sure how they do that with only two months HH's though lololo

pokergrader 10-30-2007 11:56 PM

Re: A Seif Bet - for those who still believe a word he, or AP, says
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Well, if anyone really wants to make give Seif a hard time, you could report him (and his ownership stake in Absolute) to the State bar association (of wherever he is licensed as an attorney) and let them determine whether his ownership of Absolute is unlawful or worthy of getting him disbarred.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm an attorney in St. Louis, MO. Mr. Seif's ownership of AP is not related to any practice of law and not a basis for disbarment or any other discipline. However, proof of stealing by seeing opponents hole cards might be grounds for discipline based on immoral activity. However, a criminal conviction would be needed and still might result in some punishment short of disbarrment. Of course, if he did this to a legal client, then he would likely be disbarred, but again, a criminal conviction is the needed proof. In other words, don't hold your breath.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am a California attorney. So is Mark Seif. Reporting him to the bar at this time is pointless. I can't imagine the bar investigating this mess, and it had nothing to do with the practice of law.

If there is ever credible evidence of him cheating or otherwise stealing from players at AP, I'll lead the charge. But I haven't seen a single shred of evidence that leads me to believe that Seif was involved and/or personally gained from this scandal at all.

You don't have to like him, and you don't need to think he is a good public speaker - I agree with the masses that the latest interview was nothing short of a bloody third trimester abortion of an attempt at addressing the AP scandal. You can think that he is the biggest douchebag in the poker world since Dutch Boyd. None of that makes him a thief. None of it.

The fact that he is so unpopular here, yet no one has found anything on him yet and no one on the inside at AP forwarded anything to Nat or Adar or Josem leads me to believe that Seif - to the extent that he says he never cheated or gained from the superuser account capability - is telling the truth.

Seriously though, if you get hard evidence of him cheating beyond some very weak accusations surrounding a HU session from two years ago, I'll carry the flag in the charge to the state bar disciplinary committee.

[/ QUOTE ]

What a surprise, we can't convict him in a US court without the power to actually obtain evidence (or punish the destruction of evidence)? The fact that he cannot be convicted in a US court is meaningless, nor is it even the slightest defense given the situation.

He engaged in incredibly suspicious activity and has yet to even attempt to clear his name. And the evidence that could possible clear his name is conveniently missing. The only thing he can lose here is his credibility, and he seems very willing to throw it away in order to protect himself from more meaningful losses. What do you think that means?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.