AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

For the week of 10/21 - 10/28...where the industry rose a total of 1.6%, Absolute increased 3.1%.
The week prior Absolute decreased 5.1%. The two weeks prior AP had increased 6.1% and 1.9%.

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

obviously this scandal affected their bottom line lol

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

Given that I believe you work for another site (and please correct me if this is not the case anymore), isn't it inappropriate for you to making this kind of post? Unless you are no longer affiliated with the other Internet poker room, I will have you peramently banned if you do this again.

Mason Malmuth

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

Huh? i don't see what's wrong with OP's post, even if he were a party shill. He is just stating some facts.

Edit: although this stuff should really be posted in the zoo or something.

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Given that I believe you work for another site (and please correct me if this is not the case anymore), isn't it inappropriate for you to making this kind of post? Unless you are no longer affiliated with the other Internet poker room, I will have you peramently banned if you do this again.

Mason Malmuth

[/ QUOTE ]

Assuming what he posted is widely available public knowledge, you seem well out of line regardless of who he is or who he works for.

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

OP no longer works for the poker room he used to work for.

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Given that I believe you work for another site (and please correct me if this is not the case anymore), isn't it inappropriate for you to making this kind of post? Unless you are no longer affiliated with the other Internet poker room, I will have you peramently banned if you do this again.

Mason Malmuth

[/ QUOTE ]

Hi Mason. Would you still refuse to shake my hand because I said something bad about you years ago on 2+2?

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

Don't try to change the subject. You have a long term history of association with one of the major Internet poker rooms different from the one you commented on. I don't think anything more needs to be said.

MM

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

Mason - in previous posts he has said that he no longer works for that major internet poker room.

Further, the statistics that he provided are clearly of interest to many people in BBV as a result of recent issues. There also appears to be no obvious bias in them.

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

Hi Josem:

[ QUOTE ]
Mason - in previous posts he has said that he no longer works for that major internet poker room.

Further, the statistics that he provided are clearly of interest to many people in BBV as a result of recent issues. There also appears to be no obvious bias in them.

[/ QUOTE ]

No. The above post coming from this particular poster is totally inappropriate given this person's long history with the other Internet poker room. Posts like this, if we don't flag them, can give AP legitimate grounds to complain about how we may be running our forums.

If a similar post would have come from someone with a neutral background, I would have no objection to it. But it's important to all sides in the AP issue that these forums are seen to be run in a professional and unbiased manner. Thus my comment.

Best wishes,
Mason

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

ad hominem much?

Besides did anyone really think AP's business would be hurt by this? They are going to get away with it, which is the worst part of all.

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Hi Josem:

[ QUOTE ]
Mason - in previous posts he has said that he no longer works for that major internet poker room.

Further, the statistics that he provided are clearly of interest to many people in BBV as a result of recent issues. There also appears to be no obvious bias in them.

[/ QUOTE ]

No. The above post coming from this particular poster is totally inappropriate given this person's long history with the other Internet poker room. Posts like this, if we don't flag them, can give AP legitimate grounds to complain about how we may be running our forums.

If a similar post would have come from someone with a neutral background, I would have no objection to it. But it's important to all sides in the AP issue that these forums are seen to be run in a professional and unbiased manner. Thus my comment.

Best wishes,
Mason

[/ QUOTE ]

Hi Mason,
Would you like me start each of my posts with a summary of what I am up to, who I am dating, etc.? Because I could probably do that if it would prevent you from dropping the hammer on me. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

Wait.

So if Katie Couric (CBS Evening News) went on Larry King Live and reported that ABC's viewership was down after a scandal, CNN would threaten to never let her appear on their station again?

Nice one Mason.

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Wait.

So if Katie Couric (CBS Evening News) went on Larry King Live and reported that ABC's viewership was down after a scandal, CNN would threaten to never let her appear on their station again?

Nice one Mason.

[/ QUOTE ]

Only if Katie didn't disclose who she was working for and pretended she didn't have a professional bias. You gave a bad analogy.

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Wait.

So if Katie Couric (CBS Evening News) went on Larry King Live and reported that ABC's viewership was down after a scandal, CNN would threaten to never let her appear on their station again?

Nice one Mason.

[/ QUOTE ]

Only if Katie didn't disclose who she was working for and pretended she didn't have a professional bias. You gave a bad analogy.

[/ QUOTE ]

HE DOESN'T WORK FOR XXXXXXXX, READ THE POSTS.

my analogy is wrong only because couric would need to not even work for CBS anymore. meaning it's even more ridiculous.

Re: AP Numbers (Week of Oct. 21st - 28th)
 

I would like for you to stay out of this topic. It's inappropriate, in my opinion,for someone with your background and history to be involved here.

I'm also locking this thread since I believe that all it will do is damage the situation.

MM