Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

I need to switch my registration to Republican to vote for Paul.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
I need to switch my registration to Republican to vote for Paul.

[/ QUOTE ]

Get on it!

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

Apparantly the lack of actual text with this poll is going to keep it falling off the front page. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

Its a LANDSLIDE!

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

If only 2+2 had their own country, the budget might get balanced. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
If only 2+2 had their own country, the budget might get balanced. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Pick a spot to start 2+2landia and I will move my freind.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
If only 2+2 had their own country, the budget might get balanced. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I've been thinking maybe all the ACists should band together and try buying a chunk of Australia (from the government as well as whoever owns it). Nice and out of the way, Australians would be decent neighbors, and Australia has such a sparse population that the government might go for it.

Oh... and it's not frozen. Canada would probably be more willing to part with a few hundred square miles (especially if you made it into an Indian nation thing), but that place is COLD.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If only 2+2 had their own country, the budget might get balanced. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Pick a spot to start 2+2landia and I will move my freind.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm pretty sure 2+2landia was already started in Thailand. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

Dammit I wish I could edit and fix Kucinich. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

In the Illinois primary I will be selecting from the available Green Party candidates.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

Paging andyfox...

our presumptive next president hasn't gotten a vote yet.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

They have primaries for the Green Party in Illinois? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
If only 2+2 politics forum had their own country, the budget might get balanced. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

fyp

seriously, poker players balancing the budget... el oh el

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If only 2+2 had their own country, the budget might get balanced. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Pick a spot to start 2+2landia and I will move my freind.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://freestateproject.org/

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
They have primaries for the Green Party in Illinois? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Yup, we are getting the 3,000(5,000 in reality) needed signatures for at least 3 up to 5 of our presidential candidates. I think they might be doing the same thing in California, I am not sure though.

We received major party status in Illinois because we passed the 5% thresh hold in the 2006 gubernatorial race. So, we are attempting to do some major things here in Illinois.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They have primaries for the Green Party in Illinois? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Yup, we are getting the 3,000(5,000 in reality) needed signatures for at least 3 up to 5 of our presidential candidates. I think they might be doing the same thing in California, I am not sure though.

We received major party status in Illinois because we passed the 5% thresh hold in the 2006 gubernatorial race. So, we are attempting to do some major things here in Illinois.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you sure it's not just you and my dad? Have any dead people signed the petition?

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They have primaries for the Green Party in Illinois? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Yup, we are getting the 3,000(5,000 in reality) needed signatures for at least 3 up to 5 of our presidential candidates. I think they might be doing the same thing in California, I am not sure though.

We received major party status in Illinois because we passed the 5% thresh hold in the 2006 gubernatorial race. So, we are attempting to do some major things here in Illinois.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you sure it's not just you and my dad? Have any dead people signed the petition?

[/ QUOTE ]

There are a couple more people than your dad and myself. Also, there are no dead people on our petitions...us Greens hate being compared to the democrats. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

Jesus. Looks like the Ron Paul supporters have spammed another online poll....

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
Jesus. Looks like the Ron Paul supporters have spammed another online poll....

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I've been shipping people here from a dozen other sites to get them to vote on it.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

The results could have been predicted within a couple of percent without taking the poll.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
The results could have been predicted within a couple of percent without taking the poll.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course. You knew we were going to go seek out all the other Ron Paul supporters on the Internet to come vote here. Only way he could have scored so high.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The results could have been predicted within a couple of percent without taking the poll.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course. You knew we were going to go seek out all the other Ron Paul supporters on the Internet to come vote here. Only way he could have scored so high.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, this forum doesnt need outsiders to come in and vote for RP, there are plenty here who dont recognize what a clown he is.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The results could have been predicted within a couple of percent without taking the poll.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course. You knew we were going to go seek out all the other Ron Paul supporters on the Internet to come vote here. Only way he could have scored so high.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, this forum doesnt need outsiders to come in and vote for RP, there are plenty here who dont recognize what a clown he is.

[/ QUOTE ]

So on any other online poll, Paul supporters have to "cheat" to win, but on this one... the only one where you actually know what the people who visit here believe... they don't. Gotcha, that makes sense.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The results could have been predicted within a couple of percent without taking the poll.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course. You knew we were going to go seek out all the other Ron Paul supporters on the Internet to come vote here. Only way he could have scored so high.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, this forum doesnt need outsiders to come in and vote for RP, there are plenty here who dont recognize what a clown he is.

[/ QUOTE ]

Lucky for all that we do recognize Giuliani and Romney for the clowns that they are. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The results could have been predicted within a couple of percent without taking the poll.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course. You knew we were going to go seek out all the other Ron Paul supporters on the Internet to come vote here. Only way he could have scored so high.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, this forum doesnt need outsiders to come in and vote for RP, there are plenty here who dont recognize what a clown he is.

[/ QUOTE ]

So on any other online poll, Paul supporters have to "cheat" to win, but on this one... the only one where you actually know what the people who visit here believe... they don't. Gotcha, that makes sense.

[/ QUOTE ]

It makes perfect sense. This board is far more libertarian leaning than the overall online user population. Not very difficult, now was it.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The results could have been predicted within a couple of percent without taking the poll.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course. You knew we were going to go seek out all the other Ron Paul supporters on the Internet to come vote here. Only way he could have scored so high.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, this forum doesnt need outsiders to come in and vote for RP, there are plenty here who dont recognize what a clown he is.

[/ QUOTE ]

Lucky for all that we do recognize Giuliani and Romney for the clowns that they are. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

no my dad can beat up your dad. what are you, in middle school?

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They have primaries for the Green Party in Illinois? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Yup, we are getting the 3,000(5,000 in reality) needed signatures for at least 3 up to 5 of our presidential candidates. I think they might be doing the same thing in California, I am not sure though.

We received major party status in Illinois because we passed the 5% thresh hold in the 2006 gubernatorial race. So, we are attempting to do some major things here in Illinois.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you sure it's not just you and my dad? Have any dead people signed the petition?

[/ QUOTE ]

There are a couple more people than your dad and myself. Also, there are no dead people on our petitions...us Greens hate being compared to the democrats. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

While you hate being compared to us we will continue to wonder why you are working so hard to help get Republicans elected.

Re: Nonsucky unscientific 2+2 presidential poll
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The results could have been predicted within a couple of percent without taking the poll.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course. You knew we were going to go seek out all the other Ron Paul supporters on the Internet to come vote here. Only way he could have scored so high.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, this forum doesnt need outsiders to come in and vote for RP, there are plenty here who dont recognize what a clown he is.

[/ QUOTE ]

So on any other online poll, Paul supporters have to "cheat" to win, but on this one... the only one where you actually know what the people who visit here believe... they don't. Gotcha, that makes sense.

[/ QUOTE ]

It makes perfect sense. This board is far more libertarian leaning than the overall online user population. Not very difficult, now was it.

[/ QUOTE ]

More, yes. Far more, no. How many other places online have you talked politics that aren't conservative havens? I was "converted" to ACism on a site for a random TV show. Every single place I've been online where people talk politics that isn't specifically devoted to some political group has a very strong libertarian presence.