Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27 (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=524223)

Imrahil 10-16-2007 12:18 PM

200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
Villain is 57/27/1.5 over 100 hands. Fairly sure this is standard. PF ok guys?

Poker Stars, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players
LegoPoker Hand History Converter

Hero (SB): $245.65
BB: $358.60
UTG: $70.80
CO: $393
BTN: $200

Pre-Flop: Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB)
3 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $8</font>, <font color="red">BB raises to $16</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $56</font>, BB calls $40

Flop: ($112) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $90</font>, <font color="red">BB raises to $180</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $189.65 and is All-In</font>

shandyboy 10-16-2007 12:24 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
pf: fine

flop: standard, villain will show up with all sorts here.

(ul villain shows up with 1010 this time) [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Nielsio 10-16-2007 12:28 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
std

agnoke10 10-16-2007 12:29 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
ill be honest, i really don't like this. he seems like a minraising goon, but i still think there are more hands you are behind here than ahead. The only things you are beating in my opinion are JJ, AT (maybe...), and a big draw. super tough though, hahah, the more i think about it the more it looks okay. ehhh, i still like a fold on that flop

R6MC 10-16-2007 12:55 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
[ QUOTE ]
ill be honest, i really don't like this. he seems like a minraising goon, but i still think there are more hands you are behind here than ahead. The only things you are beating in my opinion are JJ, AT (maybe...), and a big draw. super tough though, hahah, the more i think about it the more it looks okay. ehhh, i still like a fold on that flop

[/ QUOTE ]

..on that flop? lol what flop were you hoping for? you plan on set mining with QQ?

HoldEmNewby 10-16-2007 01:20 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
Imrahil,
In a blind vs blind what is your 4bet range? Does villain have any read on your 4bet range? Regardless I think your preflop line is standard.

How do you feel about open shoving the flop (thats usually my standard given pot size and stacks)?

Imrahil 10-16-2007 01:28 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
[ QUOTE ]
Imrahil,
In a blind vs blind what is your 4bet range? Does villain have any read on your 4bet range? Regardless I think your preflop line is standard.

How do you feel about open shoving the flop (thats usually my standard given pot size and stacks)?

[/ QUOTE ]

Villain is 57/27, he has no reads.

Mike MacIntosh 10-16-2007 01:57 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
[ QUOTE ]
ill be honest, i really don't like this. he seems like a minraising goon, but i still think there are more hands you are behind here than ahead. The only things you are beating in my opinion are JJ, AT (maybe...), and a big draw. super tough though, hahah, the more i think about it the more it looks okay. ehhh, i still like a fold on that flop

[/ QUOTE ]

You do realize this is BVB, right?

theplux 10-16-2007 02:05 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
not only this is BvB but this guy is a pure donk and will likely call any 4bet with junks oop like A10o. His range is really wide, im playing it the same. nh

Nick Royale 10-16-2007 02:14 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
100% std

monkover 10-16-2007 02:43 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
sorry for the nubeness guys i only moved up to 100nl recently but whats BvB?
and yeah i play it the same

XHitman014 10-16-2007 02:46 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
Blind vs. blind...there is a sticky in the FAQ with all the definitions

monkover 10-16-2007 03:20 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
[ QUOTE ]
Blind vs. blind...there is a sticky in the FAQ with all the definitions

[/ QUOTE ]


tnx [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
yeah i know that they just never used bvb in unl [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

blah-blah-blah 10-16-2007 03:21 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
[ QUOTE ]
100% std

[/ QUOTE ]

yup

Big_Jim 10-16-2007 03:27 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
Your bet sizing here appears to just be completely arbitrary, fly by the seat of your pants style.

I'd go smaller or bigger PF. Your bet size leaves you with weird stacks.

On the flop, again, I'd go smaller or just shove. You leave yourself with really awkward stacks and don't give him a chance to make a play, unless he thinks he has the best hand.

Nielsio 10-16-2007 04:07 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
[ QUOTE ]
Your bet sizing here appears to just be completely arbitrary, fly by the seat of your pants style.

I'd go smaller or bigger PF. Your bet size leaves you with weird stacks.

On the flop, again, I'd go smaller or just shove. You leave yourself with really awkward stacks and don't give him a chance to make a play, unless he thinks he has the best hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

I noticed this too. His preflop reraise is exactly 3.5x btw. I'd personally go smaller on the flop.

graydot 10-16-2007 04:32 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
weird players like min-raising AA sometimes.. but this is std

Some9 10-16-2007 04:33 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Your bet sizing here appears to just be completely arbitrary, fly by the seat of your pants style.

I'd go smaller or bigger PF. Your bet size leaves you with weird stacks.

On the flop, again, I'd go smaller or just shove. You leave yourself with really awkward stacks and don't give him a chance to make a play, unless he thinks he has the best hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

I noticed this too. His preflop reraise is exactly 3.5x btw. I'd personally go smaller on the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah flop size is baaad but since villain is even worse I don't think it matters much

Nick Royale 10-16-2007 04:36 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
I think the preflop size is ok. Flop size sucks. I bet less.

Imrahil 10-16-2007 04:42 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
How much less? $60?

Nick Royale 10-16-2007 04:44 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
[ QUOTE ]
How much less? $60?

[/ QUOTE ]
66.6

Nielsio 10-16-2007 04:45 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
[ QUOTE ]
How much less? $60?

[/ QUOTE ]

$72 - $74

Some9 10-16-2007 04:46 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
Well you want to bet an amount that might make his AK think "ahh screw it ARR IN". betting 90 into 120 kinda discourages that reponse. Anywhere from 60 to 75 seems ideal.

Imrahil 10-16-2007 05:00 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
What about $69? Or $6.90?

Nick Royale 10-16-2007 05:06 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
[ QUOTE ]
What about $69? Or $6.90?

[/ QUOTE ]
Nah. 66.6 or 6.66. Could go either way really.

Imrahil 10-16-2007 05:10 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
$2?

Nick Royale 10-16-2007 05:13 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
[ QUOTE ]
$2?

[/ QUOTE ]
2 screams we want to get raised, so he probably only raise better hands. 6.66 seems like a thin v-bet, he'll try to bluffraise that alot more often ldo

futuredoc85 10-16-2007 06:22 PM

Re: 200NL- QQ in 4bet pot BvB vs 57/27
 
imrahil: huh?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.