600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
villain is 56/12/3 over 400 hands.. He's obviously pretty ridiculous, and I expect him to put in more action earlier if he has a better hand. I assume he's bad enough to pay off with worse 9's, and it seems unlikely he has a better hand, right?
No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $3/$6 5 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $613.00 CO: $661.00 Hero: $582.00 SB: $2.329.75 BB: $1.382.90 Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is Button with K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 2 folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $24</font>, SB folds, BB calls. Flop: 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($51, 2 players) BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $40</font>, BB calls. Turn: 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($131, 2 players) BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $102</font>, BB calls. River: 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($335, 2 players) BB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $148</font> |
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
make it a cool two hundo.
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
Yeah $200 looks good. Maybe pot the river if he is the kind of fish who always interprets big bets as bluffs and will call with a draw that hit a pair or some crap.
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
i like around 250 or so. He'll find a call somehow.
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
I'd be a little concerned at someone whose AF is 3 suddenly being so passive. I'd think you'd be beaten here (set or a crazy pair) more often then you'll be called.
The way he's been playing, you should get better shots at his stack then this. |
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
i can see $100, $200 or $265 all as possibilities. not really sure what to make of $150
edit: actually i dont like 100 too much after looking back. $200-265 feels right |
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
definitely not too thin
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
[ QUOTE ]
definitely not too thin [/ QUOTE ] bet more though, he'll justify a call somehow |
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
This is not thin, this is standard......not betting here vs this guy is criminal. I also like betting a bit more, like $199.
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
[ QUOTE ]
This is not thin, this is standard......not betting here vs this guy is criminal. I also like betting a bit more, like $199. [/ QUOTE ] |
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
value shoving here would be such sick fun [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
[ QUOTE ]
value shoving here would be such sick fun [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I think 200 would do the trick |
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] value shoving here would be such sick fun [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I think 200 would do the trick [/ QUOTE ] what trick is that? the trick im trying is to get all his money by overbet shoving a marginal hand for value. a 200 bet simply will not accomplish this [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img] of course i like 200-250 more as he is much more likely to call with worse. but meh, i was thinking itd be a cool hand to post in the MSNL thread if he got called by T9 or something. and i did say it was more for fun than anything. |
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
[ QUOTE ]
This is not thin, this is standard......not betting here vs this guy is criminal. [/ QUOTE ] I thought so too. I showed this hand to a couple 2+2er friends over MSN, and both of them were doubting the value of a bet. I agree with everyone that I should have made it a little bigger! |
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
AK didn't get there. so shove!
|
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
[ QUOTE ]
value shoving here would be such sick fun [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] sick fun indeed! I still think 200ish is more profitable since he folds a lot more to a shove, but the few times that he calls and mucks to a shove here makes shoving awesome in a feeding your ego kind of way. |
Re: 600NL - river valuebet vs big fish -- too thin?
shove
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.