Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Politics (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=43)
-   -   Who would the world elect? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=489962)

Ron Burgundy 08-30-2007 02:46 PM

Who would the world elect?
 
linky

Big surprise: Paul with a huge lead. I wish real elections were held on the internets.

W brad 08-30-2007 02:52 PM

Re: Who would the world elect?
 
If real elections were held exclusively on the internet, all the normal people who vote in the real world would stop by and vote too (not just the net geeks) and Paul would still lose big time.

Borodog 08-30-2007 03:03 PM

Re: Who would the world elect?
 
Now, come on. 12,000 of the 14,000 votes for Dr. Paul are from the US. I love the guy, but this is not "the world" voting. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

L'ennemi. 08-30-2007 03:06 PM

Re: Who would the world elect?
 
Paul is ahead just because of the American vote which is massively in his favor.
Excluding the US, its a blowout for Obama.

slickpoppa 08-30-2007 03:13 PM

Re: Who would the world elect?
 
Some of you Ron Paul fanbois are just as bad as the media that you disdain about using dumb statistics. I'm sure a lot of the 2 billion people in India and China voted on that site. And even if they did, what would that prove? The vast majority of the world is even dumber and less educated than Americans.

L'ennemi. 08-30-2007 03:30 PM

Re: Who would the world elect?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Some of you Ron Paul fanbois are just as bad as the media that you disdain about using dumb statistics. I'm sure a lot of the 2 billion people in India and China voted on that site. And even if they did, what would that prove? The vast majority of the world is even dumber and less educated than Americans.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think you might be taking the OP too seriously.

Ron Burgundy 08-30-2007 03:44 PM

Re: Who would the world elect?
 
Internet polls: SERIOUS BUSINESS

Ron Burgundy 08-30-2007 03:50 PM

Re: Who would the world elect?
 
[ QUOTE ]
If real elections were held exclusively on the internet, all the normal people who vote in the real world would stop by and vote too (not just the net geeks) and Paul would still lose big time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Where is this "real world" you speak of? Is that the place I can see through my window?

mmbt0ne 08-30-2007 03:59 PM

Re: Who would the world elect?
 
The real world is where SARS and bird flu are killing millions of people a year who manage to survive through the 120 degree temperatures. It's probably best just to stay out of there.

Kurn, son of Mogh 08-30-2007 04:01 PM

Re: Who would the world elect?
 
[ QUOTE ]
linky

Big surprise: Paul with a huge lead. I wish real elections were held on the internets.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hey in '96 and '00 the 'net had Harry Browne winning by a landslide.

renodoc 08-30-2007 05:19 PM

Re: Who would the world elect?
 
note that in australia, it would be mandatory to vote.

andyfox 08-30-2007 07:30 PM

Re: Who would the world elect?
 
It's unanimous in Andorra.

Archon_Wing 08-30-2007 08:29 PM

Re: Who would the world elect?
 
Well, if you hated all the mainstream ones, then you might want to support Paul (assuming you had to pick). I can't vote for [blank]
Which is how my decision process worked. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

screw him, hate him, forget about her, who else is left?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.