he was a 79/71
 

Ultimate Bet - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $1/$2 Blinds - 5 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $90.15
BB: $124.25
UTG: $234.00
CO: $364.45
Hero (BTN): $232.35

Preflop: Hero is dealt Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (5 Players)
2 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $7.00</font>, SB calls $6.00, <font color="red">BB raises to $12.00</font>, Hero calls $5.00, SB calls $5.00

Flop: ($36) K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (3 Players)
SB checks, BB checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($36) T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (3 Players)
SB checks, BB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $22.00</font>, SB folds, BB calls $22.00

River: ($80) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">BB bets $19.00</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $137.00</font>, BB calls all-in for $71.25
Uncalled bet of $46.75 returned to Hero

Pot Size: $260.50 ($2 Rake)

BB had 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (two pair, kings and tens) and LOST (-$124.25)
Hero had Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (full house, kings full of tens) and WON (+$133.75)

Re: he was a 79/71
 

put you on 33 ldo

Re: he was a 79/71
 

bold, aggressive call

Re: he was a 79/71
 

hey, no limit holdem is a 7 card game, he happened to have 3 pairs and trapped you

Re: he was a 79/71
 

pretty sick cooler

Re: he was a 79/71
 

Some benevolent hacker PLEASE find him and neuter him

Re: he was a 79/71
 

Is this "caca22" by any chance? If it is, this is one of his better plays. (not kidding)

Re: he was a 79/71
 

Trapped you on the river. Nice fake blocking bet.

Re: he was a 79/71
 

what a call!!

Re: he was a 79/71
 

This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

Re: he was a 79/71
 

[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

is that so

Re: he was a 79/71
 

[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e7...bronlolec0.jpg

Re: he was a 79/71
 

[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol i think?

Re: he was a 79/71
 

called for deception

Re: he was a 79/71
 

Vanessa Rousso would approve.

Re: he was a 79/71
 

[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

A+ level

Re: he was a 79/71
 

I love this

Re: he was a 79/71
 

[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

Re: he was a 79/71
 

[] Put you on AK.

Re: he was a 79/71
 

clear setup play for future quads.

high level planning.

Re: he was a 79/71
 

It was a play for metagame obv.

Re: he was a 79/71
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

A+ level

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: he was a 79/71
 

[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

tl;dr why is this being read. bet flop obv also.

Re: he was a 79/71
 

[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://royalswagger.com/uploaded_ima...ous-797351.jpg

Re: he was a 79/71
 

[ QUOTE ]
Is this "caca22" by any chance? If it is, this is one of his better plays. (not kidding)

[/ QUOTE ]

its always kind of annoying when he has money and im forced to sit at the 400 tables to get his 100 bucks.

Re: he was a 79/71
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]

D- level

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: he was a 79/71
 

[ QUOTE ]
This was a bad call on his part. Because there were two Kings and two Tens on the board, everyone in the hand has at least two pair (kings and tens). Therefore, having pocket 2s doesn't help you, because in Texas Hold'em you can only play the best 5 cards (combining the 5 board cards with your 2 community cards). In this case, if you hold pocket 2s in your hand, your best 5 card hand is actually the board (KKTT4). So at best you are splitting with someone, and they would need to hold either 43, 42, 33, 32, or 22. Of course them having 22 is unlikely because there are only two 2s left in the deck. Even if the opponent has 52, they are beating someone who holds 22, because their best 5 card hand would be KKTT5, which beats KKTT4.

That's what makes this a bad call.

[/ QUOTE ]
I applaud you for the sheer effort of writing this out. A++

Re: he was a 79/71
 

I'll ship you some $$$ for his screen name at UB.

Re: he was a 79/71