Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium Stakes Limit (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=55)
-   -   30-60 Bellagio hand (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=477786)

rsk111 08-14-2007 10:29 PM

30-60 Bellagio hand
 
I don't really have any read on this guy, as this happened quite early in the session. Comments on play on all streets appreciated since I think I made multiple errors on this hand.

UTG raises, I'm UTG+1 with AsQc and I reraise. It's folded around to UTG who makes it four bets. I call

Flop Jc10c2c

He bets I, call

Turn 9s

He bets, I raise, he hesitates briefly and then calls

River 4c

He checks, I check.

sup_bro 08-14-2007 10:50 PM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
why on god's green earth would u CK this RIVER? this is an insta bet.....because he actually has Ac or Kc in his hand, he is making a larger mistake by not betting it than you are by simply CK'ing behind....

rsk111 08-14-2007 10:58 PM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
[ QUOTE ]
why on god's green earth would u CK this RIVER? this is an insta bet.....because he actually has Ac or Kc in his hand, he is making a larger mistake by not betting it than you are by simply CK'ing behind....

[/ QUOTE ]

Given his four bet pre-flop and turn call I put him on a hand that had Ac or Kc. Then when he doesn bet the river, I'm worried that he's never going to call with a worse hand (i.e., I'll only get check-raised or he'll fold).

That's what was going through my idiot brain at the time. In retrospect I would have bet the river. Part of the reason why I posted this is that I wanted to know how bad that river check was, slightly bad or very bad. Thanks for confirming my suspicion that it was the latter.

Edited to add: If I bet the river and he raises, then do you fold or call?

Milo 08-14-2007 11:47 PM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
Bet the river.

rsk111 08-14-2007 11:50 PM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
[ QUOTE ]
You have to make him fold less than 20% of the time to make this worthwhile, and you never win this pot without betting it.

Absent some read that says he is not folding (which you do not have), not betting the river is a sin.

Edited to add: If he raises you can muck with confidence.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not sure you read the hand correctly. You do realize I made a queen high flush on the river.

AragornX151 08-14-2007 11:54 PM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
Bet/call. I'd usually fold AQo to an UTG raise preflop.

MitchL 08-14-2007 11:55 PM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
Turn raise is bad.

rsk111 08-15-2007 12:03 AM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
[ QUOTE ]
Turn raise is bad.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why? I've got an OESD + Flush draw. Seems like a good spot for a semibluff. I certainly could be wrong though. Can you explain your reasoning?

afish 08-15-2007 12:18 AM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
If check-raised on the river you've got to call unless you're against the nittiest of nits. Otherwise, players will start making moves on you.

Also, if you don't have a read on a player, making it three bets preflop is probably wrong. I'd have folded AQ there.

drbk2 08-15-2007 12:23 AM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
Preflop: Eh, I don't know. The way the game used to play I agree with the 3 bet preflop, but the way it plays now I would muck it until I get further information.

Turn: I think you need to think of hands that a player you don't have a read on and who doesn't have a read on you would fold to a turn raise after 4 betting preflop and leading every street. I would say close to 0.

River: Bet.

Scary_Tiger 08-15-2007 12:33 AM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
[ QUOTE ]
why on god's green earth would u CK this RIVER? this is an insta bet.....because he actually has Ac or Kc in his hand, he is making a larger mistake by not betting it than you are by simply CK'ing behind....

[/ QUOTE ]

ackid 08-15-2007 12:33 AM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
I fold preflop.

As played bet river.

rsk111 08-15-2007 12:56 AM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
[ QUOTE ]
Preflop: Eh, I don't know. The way the game used to play I agree with the 3 bet preflop, but the way it plays now I would muck it until I get further information.

Turn: I think you need to think of hands that a player you don't have a read on and who doesn't have a read on you would fold to a turn raise after 4 betting preflop and leading every street. I would say close to 0.

River: Bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks. Your turn analysis was helpful.

MitchL 08-15-2007 01:46 AM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Turn raise is bad.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why? I've got an OESD + Flush draw. Seems like a good spot for a semibluff. I certainly could be wrong though. Can you explain your reasoning?

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry for not being more specific. Drbk said it well. This guy 4 bet pf and has bet at every opportunity on a scary board. He is never folding.

surfdoc 08-15-2007 02:13 AM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
Preflop is pretty close so I don't really care if you 3 bet or fold.

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 51.019% 44.72% 06.30% 753501864 106128984.00 { 99+, ATs+, KJs+, AJo+, KQo }
Hand 1: 48.981% 42.68% 06.30% 719147304 106128984.00 { AQo }

If you tighten the UTG raise a bit you are in very bad shape:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 61.410% 52.10% 09.31% 545942724 97592574.00 { TT+, AJs+, KQs, AQo+ }
Hand 1: 38.590% 29.28% 09.31% 306802176 97592574.00 { AQo }



Flop play is standard

Turn: Bad idea. You are never getting a fold here. Even the one hand you hope he has (AKo with no club) is still likely to see the river and you will have to barrel off. Similarly, you have basically no showdown value against his range so you will feel obligated to fire one more shell on the river if you miss. Lastly, if you get 3 bet on this tutn you will have to call. This could be actually a good learning tool since you will feel so gross and hate yourself so much you should never make that mistake again.

River: bet and make him cry call with whatever. If you get checkraised then you have the easist fold ever. For those who are saying call, you really need to lay off the dope. Do you really think he is checkraising the 9c? All the guys capable of river CR bluffs here with two red aces are sitting in the 100/200 game already.

smurfitup 08-15-2007 05:05 AM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
the flop play was expert.

emerson 08-15-2007 09:46 AM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
[ QUOTE ]
Bet/call. I'd usually fold AQo to an UTG raise preflop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Me too. After a UTG raise it would have to be folded to me all the way to the cut off before I 3 bet.

I might raise this flop. It may give you more fold equity on the turn or possibly a free card.

I think I bet the river. He would bet if he had the Ace. He probably put us on a made flush on the turn. We can probably bet the river and not fear being raised if we think there is a good chance that he would call with a pair that did not include A or K of clubs. I think AA, KK, and AJ all might call with or without the big club, as well as QQ, JJ,TT, and 99. He may have even open raised with KQ suited, which has made a straight and might call and can't be clubs.

I see one AA hand, three KK hands, and two AJ hands that we beat.

There is one AA hand, three KK hands, and one AJ hand that beat us.

Some people also raise UTG with AT suited. If he has this he may call also.

There are many more possible calling hands that we beat than beat us, if we assume he would have bet with the ace of clubs.

rsk111 08-15-2007 01:27 PM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
[ QUOTE ]
the flop play was expert.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can't tell if you are being sarcastic or not, but it does raise a question that I've been thinking about (that only few have addressed). What are the merits of flop raise vs. flop call on this hand?

AragornX151 08-15-2007 01:33 PM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
[ QUOTE ]
Me too. After a UTG raise it would have to be folded to me all the way to the cut off before I 3 bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dunno. Honestly, just folding AQo in that spot against most players isn't really losing much value. Obviously, if he's a very loose opener (of which I played several), it's an easy 3-bet in HJ or CO. 3-betting a loose raiser UTG+1 isn't terrible, but I'd need a real read to do it. In this instance, I think it's a definite fold.

The turn is a prototypical free card spot. Betting isn't HORRENDOUS, given how many outs you might have, but I think it's clearly inferior to checking because you're forced to call a c/r having no idea which, if any, outs are clean.

rsk111 08-15-2007 02:49 PM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Me too. After a UTG raise it would have to be folded to me all the way to the cut off before I 3 bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dunno. Honestly, just folding AQo in that spot against most players isn't really losing much value. Obviously, if he's a very loose opener (of which I played several), it's an easy 3-bet in HJ or CO. 3-betting a loose raiser UTG+1 isn't terrible, but I'd need a real read to do it. In this instance, I think it's a definite fold.

The turn is a prototypical free card spot. Betting isn't HORRENDOUS, given how many outs you might have, but I think it's clearly inferior to checking because you're forced to call a c/r having no idea which, if any, outs are clean.

[/ QUOTE ]

My thinking regarding the preflop play was based on the fact that the session I had played the night before was quite loose. It was common to see early position raises with hands like KQ, KJ, AT, KT, and even QJ. During the other sessions I had there the play was somewhat tighter, but not much.

drbk2 08-15-2007 03:05 PM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Me too. After a UTG raise it would have to be folded to me all the way to the cut off before I 3 bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dunno. Honestly, just folding AQo in that spot against most players isn't really losing much value. Obviously, if he's a very loose opener (of which I played several), it's an easy 3-bet in HJ or CO. 3-betting a loose raiser UTG+1 isn't terrible, but I'd need a real read to do it. In this instance, I think it's a definite fold.

The turn is a prototypical free card spot. Betting isn't HORRENDOUS, given how many outs you might have, but I think it's clearly inferior to checking because you're forced to call a c/r having no idea which, if any, outs are clean.

[/ QUOTE ]

My thinking regarding the preflop play was based on the fact that the session I had played the night before was quite loose. It was common to see early position raises with hands like KQ, KJ, AT, KT, and even QJ. During the other sessions I had there the play was somewhat tighter, but not much.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's fine and good reasons for a 3 bet with AQ. In the future you might want to include all this in your original post and then you won't be met with a host of "fold this [censored] preflop" responses.

rsk111 08-15-2007 03:52 PM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
[ QUOTE ]

That's fine and good reasons for a 3 bet with AQ. In the future you might want to include all this in your original post and then you won't be met with a host of "fold this [censored] preflop" responses.

[/ QUOTE ]

I left out this info intentionally, because I wanted to know whether 3 betting in this situation in this particular game would be OK absent this read (since it is what I would have done anyway without any read at all).

Apparently the consensus is folding is better. I have no problem with all the advice to fold -- I needed it. I only added the extra infomration now because some based their advice on how the game usually plays and because I figure that I've got almost all of the responses I'm going to get. If anyone else responds to the OP, I would want them to ignore the experience from my earlier session that I posted later.

Captain R 08-15-2007 06:46 PM

Re: 30-60 Bellagio hand
 
I think the AQo preflop is pretty much based on who is doing the raising and where. UTG tighty is a fold to me, LP loosey is an easy 3-bet.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.