Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   High Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   25/50 vs crablar (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=452976)

Stinger88 07-17-2007 12:22 AM

25/50 vs crablar
 
no real history between us, I have some idea how he plays from his posts but that's all

PokerStars Game #10980373316: Hold'em No Limit ($25/$50) - 2007/07/17 - 00:01:47 (ET)
Table 'Achilles IV' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: $tinger 88 ($7341 in chips)
Seat 2: n_tzzvicodin ($725 in chips)
Seat 3: Hold_emNL ($5007 in chips)
Seat 4: sweetluvin7 ($7791 in chips)
Seat 5: Any2Cards ($1000 in chips)
Seat 7: BONCELA ($1791 in chips)
Seat 8: poopers ($15802 in chips)
Seat 9: CrAbLaR ($14292 in chips)
sweetluvin7: posts small blind $25
Any2Cards: posts big blind $50
sarkaar: sits out
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to $tinger 88 [Ac Qs]
BONCELA: folds
poopers: folds
CrAbLaR: raises $100 to $150
$tinger 88: calls $150
n_tzzvicodin: folds
n_tzzvicodin leaves the table
Hold_emNL: folds
sweetluvin7: folds
Any2Cards: folds
*** FLOP *** [Qd 3s Ad]
CrAbLaR: bets $300
$tinger 88: raises $600 to $900
CrAbLaR: calls $600
*** TURN *** [Qd 3s Ad] [4d]
CrAbLaR: checks
$tinger 88: bets $1650
CrAbLaR: calls $1650
*** RIVER *** [Qd 3s Ad 4d] [Jh]
CrAbLaR: bets $2250

about 4700 effective left on river

MDMA 07-17-2007 12:37 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
I dislike the turnbet...as for river, that [censored] is strange, I'd just fold this. I think he's too good to do an ACTUAL blocking bet here against someone he knows is very good/thinking but which he has little history with (which would be a perfect opponent to make this induce against), it's way more likely to be an induce imo.

In the heat of the moment, though, given the betsize, I think even I would often end up calling out of confusion, but I really think that ends up badly more often than not (as in often enough to make it -ev.)

KRANTZ 07-17-2007 12:53 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
really? man w stinger's image i would be so tempted to jam for value.

if he slowplays a flush i would think he always checks it on the river. looks like AJ

MDMA 07-17-2007 12:58 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
Honestly, if it is a fake non-flush blockingbet (i.e that is one that is going to call) I'd assume it's likely something like AA/QQ/33 and AxJd (I doubt he raises AxTd and/or gets passed turn with that even), and against that range, raising for value is still not good. I guess AxKd would be possible to, but I find that one to be less likely to fire river given the chance of stinger having A3, which the other hands do well against.

NMcNasty 07-17-2007 01:04 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
I think Crablar is making a questionable blocking type bet just often enough with something like AQ, AJ, or AxKd for you to call. I don't really like a raise at all for whatever reason, I think he could easily have a small flush and will call with it (he's very aggro but does sometimes get tricky with big hands) and he's not bad enough to call that often with the weaker 2 pair hands.

I like your turn bet, he'll definitely be calling with pair/flush draw a pretty high percentage of the time.

cts 07-17-2007 01:48 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
I shove

Ship Ship McGipp 07-17-2007 01:56 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
i'd just calll out of utter confusion

imabigdeal 07-17-2007 02:26 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
i really don't see much value in raising, your line looks pretty strong and i think you'll only get looked up by a better hand here. i'm leaning towards just a call here, although you could make an argument for folding

Ansky 07-17-2007 02:29 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
[ QUOTE ]
I shove

[/ QUOTE ]

u is nasty

07-17-2007 02:59 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
I call, don't see much value in shoving without history.
it might be a blockingbet, but he also might be inducing a shove. I dont think there are many worse hands he bet-calls here with.

i wouldnt fold here because we are getting good odds and I can really see him having a hand like AJ here. seems strange for him to check-call a flush on the turn and then donk the river.

mperich 07-17-2007 04:57 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
Looks like a pretty standard call here. I think we are ahead pretty often but I dont think he calls a shove if he is behind, pretty much ever. Then again I havent played vs u that much or him so if you guys have crazy history then go for it

-Mike

Jman28 07-17-2007 05:41 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
I'd just press one of my call buttons.

AAismyfriend 07-17-2007 06:48 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
[ QUOTE ]
really? man w stinger's image i would be so tempted to jam for value.

if he slowplays a flush i would think he always checks it on the river. looks like AJ

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, this is AJ/AQ a lot.

whitelime 07-17-2007 06:50 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'd just press one of my call buttons.

[/ QUOTE ]

jfish 07-17-2007 06:52 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
instashove. its crablar [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

EmpireMaker2 07-17-2007 07:19 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
[ QUOTE ]
I dislike the turnbet...as for river, that [censored] is strange, I'd just fold this. I think he's too good to do an ACTUAL blocking bet here against someone he knows is very good/thinking but which he has little history with (which would be a perfect opponent to make this induce against), it's way more likely to be an induce imo.

In the heat of the moment, though, given the betsize, I think even I would often end up calling out of confusion, but I really think that ends up badly more often than not (as in often enough to make it -ev.)

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL this is maybe the worst advice ive ever seen.......

Raise more on flop, bet turn, just call the river.

True 07-17-2007 08:23 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I dislike the turnbet...as for river, that [censored] is strange, I'd just fold this. I think he's too good to do an ACTUAL blocking bet here against someone he knows is very good/thinking but which he has little history with (which would be a perfect opponent to make this induce against), it's way more likely to be an induce imo.

In the heat of the moment, though, given the betsize, I think even I would often end up calling out of confusion, but I really think that ends up badly more often than not (as in often enough to make it -ev.)

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL this is maybe the worst advice ive ever seen.......

Raise more on flop, bet turn, just call the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

paulnic 07-17-2007 09:24 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
[ QUOTE ]
I shove

[/ QUOTE ]

what are u trying to achieve by shoving? do u think AK is going to call you? i think the only thing that will call is a better hand.. is this not basic stuff??? possibly the only hand that will call a shove is AJ... thats 1 hand out of many possibles that u beat v.s many u lose to... i dont like folding but u have to call this bet imo.

Not sure if u were kidding around here cts or u know something about this player but would be interested if u would explain why u would shove here

MDMA 07-17-2007 10:19 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
Funny to see what kind of giant retards EM2 and True are.

Parlay Slow 07-17-2007 10:30 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
would be very torn between call and shove.. i'd hate to shove and get instacalled by a set

JooWish622 07-17-2007 11:33 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
aren't you missing out on value from other aces and two pair hands?

given that they play a little more laggy, isnt a turn bet here standard?


[ QUOTE ]
Funny to see what kind of giant retards EM2 and True are.

[/ QUOTE ]

JooWish622 07-17-2007 11:34 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
this ia pretty sick given the right game conditions...
absolutely sick.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I shove

[/ QUOTE ]

u is nasty

[/ QUOTE ]

niceh4nd 07-17-2007 01:56 PM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
he slow played flush IMO

BalugaWhale 07-17-2007 03:44 PM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
this is AJ a lot.

nycballer 07-17-2007 03:47 PM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
I don't think this is a flush, isn't the point of the c/c with a flush on turn move is so that u shove river to rep a missed nut draw? the small bet doesn't make sense.

that said if u can rule out a flush i think this is a shove

MYNAMEIZGREG 07-17-2007 03:51 PM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
I feel like we should go all in and this looks like AJ/AQ exactly.

TheWorstPlayer 07-17-2007 04:07 PM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
i would be amazed if he showed up with AJ here. I think it's very unlikely he'd play it like this.

JooWish622 07-17-2007 04:25 PM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
but AJ seems like the most likely hand... but then again I'm transparant.

[ QUOTE ]
i would be amazed if he showed up with AJ here. I think it's very unlikely he'd play it like this.

[/ QUOTE ]

TheWorstPlayer 07-17-2007 04:47 PM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
but no it doesnt seem like his most likely hand. it seems, at least to me, like a very UNlikely hand.

KRANTZ 07-17-2007 04:57 PM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
AxJd is by FAR his most likely hand here

Ship Ship McGipp 07-17-2007 05:01 PM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
[ QUOTE ]
AxJd is by FAR his most likely hand here

[/ QUOTE ]

i think so too, but i don't think it's enough to warrant a shove; but that has to much to do with balancing , etc, tbh, if you shove as a bluff here often, and he also knows this, then i think it warrants a shove; without having a rep exactly like that, i don't think shoving is worth it...

oscillator 07-17-2007 11:39 PM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
first thoughts were Aj with qq coming in a distant second. i think em2000 gave the best line, but cts' answer has me curious as to what better ( or of equal value ) hands might we get to fold here by shoving. any takers!?

edit: bleh, not many given stingers stack so id assume it would be purely for value, but what if effective stacks were 14k?

cts 07-17-2007 11:45 PM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
its for value obv

10K-in-Clay 07-18-2007 12:53 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
what do you guys think crablar thinks stingers raising range is on this flop? AQ A3 33 FD's and air?? That said wouldn't AxJd be at the bottom of his range after he calls this turn bet??? I agree that it is a very likely holding but theres a lot of stuff he could have slow played and then made this small valueish bluff inducer type bet with like sets or flushes.

leatherass 07-19-2007 02:25 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
Since there is no real history between the two of you here I really like just calling this river. I just think that it isn't going to be too often you will get looked up by a worse hand here. I do thinnk your hand is good though and I think axjd is easily his most likely holding.

bottomset 07-19-2007 02:51 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'd just press one of my call buttons.

[/ QUOTE ]

haha

someone should mod your table so you have 2call buttons

xorbie 07-19-2007 03:04 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
[ QUOTE ]
AxJd is by FAR his most likely hand here

[/ QUOTE ]

there's also two combos of JxJ[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

Stinger88 07-19-2007 03:05 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
should I post results yet?

imabigdeal 07-19-2007 04:21 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
yes!

Episteme 07-19-2007 05:22 AM

Re: 25/50 vs crablar
 
lemme guess, you shoved and he called w/ 76dd? just a guess...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.