Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=56)
-   -   FGators26 Mucks. (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=438221)

FGators 06-28-2007 03:21 PM

FGators26 Mucks.
 
all in the last 2 hours, -1800 really quick. Funny I can't suck out on people, I guess its because I'm always getting my money in good (waiting for a comment about not getting it in good on the last hand).

PokerStars Game #10663956697: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2007/06/28 - 13:49:21 (ET)
Table 'Vera IV' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 4: FGators26 ($200 in chips)
Seat 5: FrinkX ($221.70 in chips)
Seat 6: lwilliams86 ($456.95 in chips)
FrinkX: posts small blind $1
lwilliams86: posts big blind $2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to FGators26 [5c Ac]
FGators26: raises $6 to $8
FrinkX: raises $18 to $26
lwilliams86: folds
FGators26: calls $18
*** FLOP *** [5h 3c Jd]
FrinkX: bets $38
mlb426 has returned
FGators26: raises $136 to $174 and is all-in
lwilliams86 said, "what about me gators??"
FrinkX: calls $136
*** TURN *** [5h 3c Jd] [4c]
*** RIVER *** [5h 3c Jd 4c] [Th]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
FrinkX: shows [4s 4h] (three of a kind, Fours)
FGators26: mucks hand
FrinkX collected $401 from pot

PokerStars Game #10665266361: Hold'em No Limit ($2/$4) - 2007/06/28 - 15:13:20 (ET)
Table 'Dodona V' 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: MyNameIsHov ($342 in chips)
Seat 2: chang_rich ($430.95 in chips)
Seat 3: FGators26 ($410.30 in chips)
Seat 4: Bouge_Todd ($686 in chips)
Seat 5: plghh ($356 in chips)
Seat 6: Klaskin ($597.20 in chips)
chang_rich: posts small blind $2
FGators26: posts big blind $4
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to FGators26 [Ac As]
Bouge_Todd: folds
plghh: folds
Klaskin: folds
MyNameIsHov: folds
chang_rich: raises $12 to $16
FGators26: raises $36 to $52
chang_rich: calls $36
*** FLOP *** [3d 5c 8s]
chang_rich: checks
FGators26: bets $76
chang_rich: raises $100 to $176
FGators26: raises $182.30 to $358.30 and is all-in
chang_rich: calls $182.30
*** TURN *** [3d 5c 8s] [Qd]
*** RIVER *** [3d 5c 8s Qd] [6s]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
chang_rich: shows [6c 8c] (two pair, Eights and Sixes)
FGators26: mucks hand
chang_rich collected $817.60 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***

PokerStars Game #10664753434: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2007/06/28 - 14:41:01 (ET)
Table 'Euneus IV' 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: arco1955 ($164.80 in chips)
Seat 2: FGators26 ($174.90 in chips)
Seat 3: Weak Tite ($460.70 in chips)
Seat 4: Geert99 ($203 in chips)
Seat 5: hanney81 ($128.10 in chips)
Weak Tite: posts small blind $1
Geert99: posts big blind $2
Drewfus81: sits out
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to FGators26 [9s Ts]
hanney81: calls $2
arco1955: raises $6 to $8
FGators26: calls $8
Weak Tite: folds
Geert99: folds
hanney81: calls $6
*** FLOP *** [8h Js 3c]
hanney81: checks
arco1955: bets $22
FGators26: calls $22
hanney81: folds
*** TURN *** [8h Js 3c] [7h]
arco1955: bets $74
FGators26: raises $70.90 to $144.90 and is all-in
arco1955: calls $60.80 and is all-in
*** RIVER *** [8h Js 3c 7h] [3d]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
arco1955: shows [3h Jh] (a full house, Threes full of Jacks)
FGators26: shows [9s Ts] (a straight, Seven to Jack)
arco1955 collected $338.60 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***

last one is against the biggest fish ever, I played it unorthodox to say the least but when u see his hand I dont think you can fault me too much, this was a person calling pushes with A high

PokerStars Game #10664439187: Hold'em No Limit ($1/$2) - 2007/06/28 - 14:21:27 (ET)
Table 'Beryl' 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: FrinkX ($513.60 in chips)
Seat 2: mrcrgl ($291.05 in chips)
Seat 3: -Skimask75- ($194 in chips)
Seat 4: FGators26 ($210.35 in chips)
Seat 5: tapatapa ($200 in chips)
Seat 6: Jolanthe ($220 in chips)
FGators26: posts small blind $1
tapatapa: posts big blind $2
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to FGators26 [Qh Qs]
FrinkX said, "did u see the hand?"
Jolanthe: raises $12 to $14
FrinkX: folds
mrcrgl: folds
-Skimask75-: folds
FGators26: raises $24 to $38
tapatapa: folds
Jolanthe: calls $24
*** FLOP *** [Jc 7c Tc]
FGators26: bets $172.35 and is all-in
Jolanthe: calls $172.35
*** TURN *** [Jc 7c Tc] [6s]
FGators26 said, "zzz"
*** RIVER *** [Jc 7c Tc 6s] [Jh]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
FGators26: shows [Qh Qs] (two pair, Queens and Jacks)
Jolanthe: shows [9s 8c] (a straight, Seven to Jack)
tapatapa said, "lol"
Jolanthe collected $419.70 from pot

brazilio 06-28-2007 03:23 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
Who cares if your hands suck or not, you [censored] blow ass at BBV now gtfo

Warteen 06-28-2007 03:24 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
You didn't get your money in good on the last hand.

Edit: Video or ban.

FGators 06-28-2007 03:24 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
I think I have now posted over $250,000 worth of bad beats.

I thought that in poker if you get sucked out on it should go the other way and you can start hitting cards on your opponents.

That thing called variance.

Hmm, hasn't happened yet.

Imrahil 06-28-2007 03:25 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
You run good.

PartysOver 06-28-2007 03:28 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
hand 1 is lol

dp13368 06-28-2007 03:29 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think I have now posted over $250,000 worth of bad beats.

I thought that in poker if you get sucked out on it should go the other way and you can start hitting cards on your opponents.

That thing called variance.

Hmm, hasn't happened yet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Didn't you doctor a word document making it look like you got the money in good?

raze 06-28-2007 03:29 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I thought that in poker if you get sucked out on it should go the other way and you can start hitting cards on your opponents.

Hmm, hasn't happened yet.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL, what does that tell you...

Imrahil 06-28-2007 03:30 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
hand 1 is lol

[/ QUOTE ]

It's fine vs. FrinkX I think.

grouchie 06-28-2007 03:32 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think I have now posted over $250,000 worth of bad beats.

I thought that in poker if you get sucked out on it should go the other way and you can start hitting cards on your opponents.

That thing called variance.

Hmm, hasn't happened yet.

[/ QUOTE ]


I disagree.
Unless you are very rich and have an unlimied bankroll, variance has happened the other way.


You have posted over 250k in bad beats... This i'll take your word for.

So, you've lost over 250k and are still playig 1/2NL.
Normally most people are not going to have a bankroll that is 250k big for 1/2NL. So, you have obviously won some pots as well.

Figuring that you are doing nothing but breaking even, that would mean you have lost 250k and won 250k as well.

no?

joeblack 06-28-2007 03:36 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Who cares if your hands suck or not, you [censored] blow ass at BBV now gtfo

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT and you talk/post in 3rd person super beat

Mrage 06-28-2007 03:37 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
To suckout as much as bad opponents, you have to get your money in bad just as often. That might be a solid strategy, but I'm not going to test it.

btmagnetw 06-28-2007 03:38 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think I have now posted over $250,000 worth of bad beats.

I thought that in poker if you get sucked out on it should go the other way and you can start hitting cards on your opponents.

That thing called variance.

Hmm, hasn't happened yet.

[/ QUOTE ]IF IT WEREN'T FOR LUCK I'D HAVE AN EXTRA $250,000

grouchie 06-28-2007 03:40 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think I have now posted over $250,000 worth of bad beats.

I thought that in poker if you get sucked out on it should go the other way and you can start hitting cards on your opponents.

That thing called variance.

Hmm, hasn't happened yet.

[/ QUOTE ]IF IT WEREN'T FOR LUCK I'D HAVE lost AN EXTRA $250,000

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

viper930 06-28-2007 03:41 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
lol ur so bad

Kala1928 06-28-2007 03:42 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think I have now posted over $250,000 worth of bad beats.

I thought that in poker if you get sucked out on it should go the other way and you can start hitting cards on your opponents.

That thing called variance.

Hmm, hasn't happened yet.

[/ QUOTE ]

You need to start shoving allin with 4 outs more. You are due to hit anyway so its not losing play.

CybrPunk 06-28-2007 03:52 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
On a brighter note, it's a good thing you can win donkaments so that you can continue to play through those tough downswings.

Ship Ship McGipp 06-28-2007 03:53 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
lol ur so bad

[/ QUOTE ]

NoahL 06-28-2007 03:56 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 

"On a brighter note, it's a good thing you can win donkaments so that you can continue to play through those tough downswings."

You're going to lose donkaments too. We can start a support group. Donkament winners who bust at 1/2

NoahSD 06-28-2007 04:13 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
Can Gators please agree to play someone good HU?

I used to feel bad for you, but now I'm just annoyed that you suck and refuse to learn and whine about it a lot. It also sucks that lots of your money keeps going to the fish instead of just directly to good players. So, please agree to play a good player HU to prove how awesome you are. I suggest me.

joeblack 06-28-2007 04:14 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
I am postive FGators submits post's like this to give himself more attention weather it be positive or negative.

FGators 06-28-2007 04:19 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Can Gators please agree to play someone good HU?

I used to feel bad for you, but now I'm just annoyed that you suck and refuse to learn and whine about it a lot. It also sucks that lots of your money keeps going to the fish instead of just directly to good players. So, please agree to play a good player HU to prove how awesome you are. I suggest me.

[/ QUOTE ]

I am FGators26, if you didn't know. The guy getting his money in good a lot.

And if you have an edge on me its not large.

FGators 06-28-2007 04:21 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
Noah,

I am quite confused on how I "suck" because I post bad beats in a Bad Beats forum.

If I "sucked" I wouldn't be getting my money in good in these spots, I'd be finding a way to get them in while I'm behind.

shortline99 06-28-2007 04:22 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Noah,

I am quite confused on how I "suck" because I post bad beats in a Bad Beats forum.

If I "sucked" I wouldn't be getting my money in good in these spots, I'd be finding a way to get them in while I'm behind.

[/ QUOTE ]
but... you're losing.

(please play noah)

FGators 06-28-2007 04:24 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
Im not really losing, I win when I don't get 2 and 3 outered constantly. This is a daily occurence.

I win when my hands that I get in with an 80% or more fav. hold, and when they don't this happens.

I am the unluckiest player in the history of online poker and its really not close.

Nobody has lost this number of hands to 1,2, and 3 outers consistently from June 1, 2005 to June 28,2007.

Nobody.

If they did they would be out committing homicides or hanging themselves.

I'm a good sport, believe it not. I keep coming back for more knowing that my account is rigged.

Longtrail099 06-28-2007 04:26 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
video or ban

shortline99 06-28-2007 04:26 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
If they did they would be out committing homicides or hanging themselves.

[/ QUOTE ]
at least they kill themselves before posting here.

FGators 06-28-2007 04:29 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
Now that I have thought about it I've definitely lost wayyy over 250k in bad beats overall.

I generally lose around $2000 per day on beats like this, 1/2/3 outers.

$2000*600 (how many days I've been playing $1/2)=1.2 million

Add in about $200k worth of tournament suckouts in big tourneys where I was an 80% favorite and I've been [censored] out of roughly $1.4 million dollars by PokerStars.

Give me $1.4 million and I could have been staked potentially for High Stakes Poker 4 or the WSOP and my life would be different.

Fun game; lots and lots and lots of skill involved.

shortline99 06-28-2007 04:30 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
okay video now video every video other video word video i video type video in video this video thread video will video be video video video video video video

Ship Ship McGipp 06-28-2007 04:30 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
FGators I'll play you HU and give you 2 to 1 odds???

SkeetyMcdoogle 06-28-2007 04:32 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
jesus christ shutup man

who tallies their bad beats over 600 days, honestly

LionelHutz00 06-28-2007 04:33 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
I'd love to see a Sklansky Bux graph, sir.

Imrahil 06-28-2007 04:33 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
I'd love to see a Sklansky Bux graph, sir.

[/ QUOTE ]

FGators 06-28-2007 04:35 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
Aejones and nobody on this site has that gigantic of an edge on me.

I'd be playing high stakes if luck wasnt involved.

Ship Ship McGipp 06-28-2007 04:36 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
jwesus christ you're so bad it's like you don't even know it

HoldenFoldem 06-28-2007 04:37 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
I warms my heart to know that "I am not the only one...."

suck it up buddy, and start keeping track of your own suckouts...this will cheer you up immensely, i promise.

Sphere99991 06-28-2007 04:38 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
[ QUOTE ]
Now that I have thought about it I've definitely lost wayyy over 250k in bad beats overall.

I generally lose around $2000 per day on beats like this, 1/2/3 outers.

$2000*600 (how many days I've been playing $1/2)=1.2 million

Add in about $200k worth of tournament suckouts in big tourneys where I was an 80% favorite and I've been [censored] out of roughly $1.4 million dollars by PokerStars.

Give me $1.4 million and I could have been staked potentially for High Stakes Poker 4 or the WSOP and my life would be different.

Fun game; lots and lots and lots of skill involved.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is it too far-fetched to say that you probably lose when you're an 80% favorite something like, I dunno, say..... 20% of the time? When you lose as a 100.0% favorite, then you can bitch. Otherwise, seriously dude, if you get it in as an 80% favorite 10,000 times... that's awesome. But you're going to lose like 2,000 of them. Don't give me this unluckiest player ever crap. I'm sure you have more bad beats than me, but I'm also sure that you play like 1000x more hands than me too, so it probably follows.

FrinkX 06-28-2007 04:40 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
u [censored] suck fgators

FGators 06-28-2007 04:49 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
When I'm an 80% favorite I lose 65% of the time, based on my calculations.

NoahL 06-28-2007 04:50 PM

Re: FGators26 Mucks.
 
I'm on life tilt.

i think fgators is too.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.